Summary Security Force Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Civil Offences Beyond Simple Hurt And Theft: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Vague Allegations Cannot Dissolve a Sacred Marital Relationship: Karnataka High Court Upholds Dismissal of Divorce Petition Daughters Entitled to Coparcenary Rights in Ancestral Property under Hindu Succession Act, 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Divorce | False Allegations of Domestic Violence and Paternity Questions Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Hostile Witness Testimony Admissible if Corroborated by Independent Evidence: Punjab and Haryana High Court Fraud Must Be Specifically Pleaded and Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt to Invalidate Registered Documents: Andhra Pradesh High Court Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Rash Driving Conviction But Grants Probation to First-Time Offender Bus Driver Orissa High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband Convicted of Wife's Murder Merit Cannot Be Sacrificed for Procedural Technicalities in NEET UG Admissions: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Upholds Partition Decrees: Unregistered Partition Deed Inadmissible, Fails to Prove Prior Partition - Joint Hindu Family Property Presumed Undivided: Patna High Court Section 195(1)(b) CrPC | Judicial Integrity Cannot Be Undermined: Supreme Court Restores Evidence Tampering Case In a NDPS Case Readiness and Willingness, Not Time, Decide Equity in Sale Agreements: Supreme Court Denies Specific Performance Prolonged Detention Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 21: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Money Laundering Case DV ACT | Economic Abuse Includes Alienation of Assets, Necessitating Protection Orders: Allahabad High Court Illegal Structures to Face Demolition: Bombay HC Directs Strict Action Against Unauthorized Constructions Justice Must Extend to the Last Person Behind Bars: Supreme Court Pushes for Full Implementation of BNSS Section 479 to Relieve Undertrial Prisoners Efficiency Over Central Oversight: Supreme Court Asserts Need for Localized SIT in Chennai Case Partition, Not Injunction, Is Remedy for Joint Property Disputes: P&H High Court Dismisses Plea Subsequent Purchaser Can Question Plaintiff’s Intent: MP High Court Clarifies Specific Relief Act

Section 48 of Transfer of Property Act Prevails: Subsequent Transfers Subservient to Prior Deeds: Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Punjab and Haryana High Court Resolves Property Dispute, Upholds Earlier Gift Deeds and Applies Doctrine of Feeding the Title

In a recent landmark judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana resolved a protracted property dispute by ruling in favor of the appellants, citing the doctrine of feeding the title and Section 48 of the Transfer of Property Act. Justice Anil Kshetarpal delivered the verdict on May 2, 2024, which upheld the validity of prior gift deeds executed by Sh. Raj Kishan in Favor of his nephew and daughters, despite claims of fraud and ancestral property rights by the plaintiff.

The case revolved around the validity of two registered gift deeds executed by Sh. Raj Kishan in 1997. The first gift deed, dated September 1, 1997, transferred land measuring 16 Kanals and 15 Marlas to his nephew, Sh. Raj Pal. The second gift deed, dated October 14, 1997, was in favor of his five daughters. Sh. Ram Kala, claiming the property was Joint Hindu Family Coparcenary property, filed a suit asserting that Sh. Raj Kishan had no right to alienate the property. Further, he alleged that the gift deeds were fraudulent and that Sh. Raj Kishan was of unsound mind.

Validity of Prior Gift Deeds:

The court found that the gift deed in favor of Sh. Raj Pal, executed earlier, held precedence over the subsequent deed. Citing Section 48 of the Transfer of Property Act, the judgment emphasized, "Subsequently executed transfer deeds shall be subservient to the previously executed transfer deeds." This principle was crucial in determining the legitimacy of the property transfers.

Doctrine of Feeding the Title:

Justice Kshetarpal applied the doctrine of feeding the title to uphold the sales conducted by Sh. Raj Kishan’s daughters. Despite the plaintiff's arguments, the court noted that the daughters, having received the property via the second gift deed, validly sold it to defendants 10 to 12, thereby confirming their ownership.

Rejection of Fraud and Mental Incapacity Claims:

The court dismissed the claims of fraud and mental incapacity against Sh. Raj Kishan. It was noted that the plaintiff, Sh. Ram Kala, did not appear for cross-examination, which weakened his assertions. Moreover, the court remarked, "The defendants never got an opportunity to cross-examine the witness. The absence of such a critical step casts doubt on the plaintiff's allegations."

Justice Kshetarpal stated, "The application of Section 48 of the Transfer of Property Act decisively favors the appellants, given the chronological precedence of the gift deed in favor of Raj Pal."

This judgment by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana not only upholds the principles of the Transfer of Property Act but also reinforces the importance of adhering to established legal doctrines like feeding the title. By dismissing the appeals against the earlier gift deeds, the court has clarified the legal standing of property transfers and set a significant precedent for future cases involving similar disputes.

 

Date of Decision: May 2, 2024

Parvinder Singh (since deceased) through LRs and others v. Rajpal and others

Similar News