Plaintiff In Title Suit Must Prove Own Case On Independent Evidence, Cannot Rely On Weakness Of Defence: Supreme Court Advocate Commissioner's Failure To Localize Land Per Title Deeds Fatal To Encroachment Claim: Andhra Pradesh High Court Enmity Is A Double-Edged Weapon, Can Be Motive For False Implication As Much As For Crime: Allahabad High Court Parity In Bail: Karnataka High Court Grants Relief To Accused In Robbery Case As Mastermind & Main Offenders Were Already Enlarged Specific Performance Denied If Buyer Fails To Prove Continuous Readiness With Funds; Part-Payment Can't Be Forfeited Without Specific Clause: Delhi High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept In Police Stations For Long, Courts Must Judiciously Exercise Power To Release On Supurdagi: Madhya Pradesh High Court Prolonged Incarceration Militates Against Article 21, Constitutional Principles Must Override Section 37 NDPS Rigors: Punjab & Haryana High Court Onus On Individual To Prove Claim Of 'Fear Of Religious Persecution' For Exemption Under Foreigners Act: Calcutta High Court Direct Recruits Cannot Claim Seniority From A Date Prior To Their Entry Into The Cadre: Orissa High Court Sale Deed Executed After Land Vests In State Confers No Title; Post-Vesting Purchaser Can’t Claim Compensation: Calcutta High Court No Right To Blanket Regularization For Contractual Staff; State Must Timely Fill Sanctioned Vacancies Under Reserved Quota: Supreme Court Non-Signatory Collaborator Under 'Deed Of Joint Undertaking' Can Invoke Arbitration Clause As A 'Veritable Party': Supreme Court Insolvency Proceedings Cannot Be Used As Coercive Recovery Mechanism For Complex Contractual Disputes: Supreme Court Legal Heirs Who Were Parties To Sale Cannot Challenge Transfer Under PTCL Act After Long Delay: Supreme Court SC/ST Act | Proceedings To Annul Sale Illegal If Initiated By Legal Heirs Who Were Parties To The Transaction: Supreme Court Consumers Cannot Be Burdened With Tariff Charges Beyond Period Of Service Delivery: Supreme Court Mere Non-Production Of Old Selection Records Or Non-Publication Of All Candidates' Marks No Ground To Direct Appointment: Supreme Court

Section 260A IT Act -Only the high court in the assessor's jurisdiction - Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court reaffirmed that only the High Court whose territorial jurisdiction the assessing officer is located may hear an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against decisions of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

According to Section 260A of the IT Act, if the High Court determines that the matter includes a significant legal issue, it may be appropriate to appeal a decision made by the Appellate Tribunal in an appeal made prior to the date the National Tax Tribunal was established.

In this instance, the Punjab and Haryana High Court received the appeal made according to Section 260A. The Assessing Officer who issued the decision was located in Surat, within the State of Gujarat, so the High Court instructed the appellant to bring the appeal before the High Court of Gujarat.

The petitioner cited the following recent ruling in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. ABC Papers Ltd. (2022) 9 SCC 1 before the Apex Court:

Regarding the argument that the High Court of Gujarat has adopted a divergent position, the bench made the following observation: "We need only mention that any divergent position that has been adopted cannot survive after the authoritative declaration by this Court in the decision we have referenced.

Commissioner of Income Tax - I vs Balak Capital Pvt Ltd

Latest Legal News