Industrial Units In MIDC Areas Exempt From Municipal Property Tax Only As Long As MIDC Provides Amenities: Supreme Court MIDC Service Charges Are Fees For Services, Not Taxes; Industrial Units Must Pay Municipal Property Tax: Supreme Court Public Servants Have No Vested Right To Be Considered For Promotion Under Repealed Rules: Supreme Court IBC | Successful Resolution Applicant Cannot Renege From Approved Plan By Citing Pending Litigations Or Letter Of Intent Conditions: Supreme Court Payment Of 93% Sale Consideration Demonstrates Readiness & Willingness For Specific Performance: Supreme Court Delay In Issuing Legal Notice No Ground To Deny Specific Performance If Suit Filed Within Limitation: Supreme Court Brandishing Pistol At Children During Abduction Inherently Constitutes Threat To Cause Death Or Hurt: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 364A IPC Lack Of CDR Records For 2003-Era Kidnapping Not Fatal To Prosecution If Oral Evidence Of Ransom Is Cogent: Supreme Court Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage On Ground Of Irretrievable Breakdown Under Article 142 Despite Wife's Opposition To Decree Failure To Conduct TIP For Unknown Accused Diminishes Evidentiary Value Of Dock Identification: Supreme Court Acquits Rape-Murder Convicts On Death Row Padded Evidence Created By Investigating Agency To Bolster Prosecution Case Fatal To Conviction In Circumstantial Evidence Cases: Supreme Court CCI Has No Inherent Power To Keep Combination Approval In Abeyance Or Order Re-Notification Without Express Statutory Authority: Supreme Court CCI Cannot Reopen Concluded Merger Approvals After One Year; Characterization Dispute In Filing Is Not 'Non-Disclosure': Supreme Court Sets Aside Orders Against Amazon Stamping Defects Are Curable, Arbitrators Empowered To Decide Such Objections Under Section 16 A&C Act: Supreme Court Rejection Of Section 16 Objection By Arbitrator Cannot Be Challenged Under Article 226/227; Aggrieved Party Must Wait For Final Award: Supreme Court Police Parading Accused Or Orchestrating Social Media Condemnation Is Extra-Legal Punishment, Violates Article 21: Rajasthan High Court Inclusion Of Hash Value In Electronic Record Certificates Is Essential For Data Integrity; Not Arbitrary: Supreme Court Judiciary Not Above Criticism; Portraying Imaginary Corrupt Court In Films Doesn't Scandalize Real Courts: Madras High Court

Section 260A IT Act -Only the high court in the assessor's jurisdiction - Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court reaffirmed that only the High Court whose territorial jurisdiction the assessing officer is located may hear an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against decisions of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

According to Section 260A of the IT Act, if the High Court determines that the matter includes a significant legal issue, it may be appropriate to appeal a decision made by the Appellate Tribunal in an appeal made prior to the date the National Tax Tribunal was established.

In this instance, the Punjab and Haryana High Court received the appeal made according to Section 260A. The Assessing Officer who issued the decision was located in Surat, within the State of Gujarat, so the High Court instructed the appellant to bring the appeal before the High Court of Gujarat.

The petitioner cited the following recent ruling in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. ABC Papers Ltd. (2022) 9 SCC 1 before the Apex Court:

Regarding the argument that the High Court of Gujarat has adopted a divergent position, the bench made the following observation: "We need only mention that any divergent position that has been adopted cannot survive after the authoritative declaration by this Court in the decision we have referenced.

Commissioner of Income Tax - I vs Balak Capital Pvt Ltd

Latest Legal News