Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court

Sanction for Prosecution Not Required: manufacturing of forged documents not the part of the official duty: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has overturned a decision by the Karnataka High Court regarding the necessity of sanction for prosecuting a public servant under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The case involved respondent No. 2, a village accountant, accused of fabricating official documents.

The Apex Court’s judgment, led by Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, highlights the nuanced interpretation of legal provisions concerning the prosecution of public servants. The Supreme Court observed, “Certainly, a view can be taken that manufacturing of such documents or fabrication of records cannot be a part of the official duty of a public servant” [Para 25]. This observation is pivotal in understanding the court’s stance on the matter.

The initial complaint, lodged in 2016, accused the respondent of creating false documents for illegal gain. While the High Court initially refused to interfere with the FIR, it later quashed the complaint and chargesheet due to the absence of sanction for the prosecution of the public servant, which became the crux of the appeal in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court, in its detailed analysis, remarked on the essence of Section 197 Cr.PC, stating, “Section 197 Cr.PC does not extend its protective cover to every act or omission of a public servant while in service. It is restricted to only those acts or omissions which are done by public servants in the discharge of official duties” [Para 23]. This statement clarifies the court’s interpretation of the law in contexts where public servants’ actions are allegedly criminal and unconnected with their official duties.

In setting aside the High Court’s order, the Supreme Court has remanded the matter for further proceedings, ensuring that the judicial approach aligns with the legal framework governing the sanction for the prosecution of public servants. This judgment is expected to have significant implications for cases involving alleged criminal activities by public servants in India.

Date of Decision: 17th January 2024

SHADAKSHARI VS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

 

Latest Legal News