Knife Never Found, Depth of Wounds Unknown: Delhi HC Refuses To Upgrade Stabbing Conviction From Grievous Hurt To Attempt To Murder 'AL KAMDHENU GOLD' Belongs To Kamdhenu, Not Ashiana: Delhi HC Finds 2002 Agreement Was A Licence, Not An Assignment — Grants Injunction Against Steel Rival Land Acquired In 2004 At ₹19,660/sq.m — Company Can Now Claim ₹1,30,000/sq.m After Neighbour's Plot Gets That Rate: Delhi HC Allows Amendment After 16 Years State Used Eminent Domain to Hand Over 53 Acres to a Non-Existent Company: Karnataka High Court Quashes Acquisition, Orders CBI Investigation Trademark | Passing Off Action Requires Only Likelihood Of Confusion, Not Strict Proof Of Counterfeiting: Madras High Court Buyer Failing To Pay Full Amount On Time Cannot Sustain Cheating Case If Seller Transfers Property To Third Party: Madhya Pradesh High Court State Cannot Arbitrarily Deviate From Merit-Based Posting SOP For Senior Resident Doctors: Calcutta High Court Ready Reckoner Rates Cannot Form Sole Basis For Determining Land Acquisition Compensation: Bombay High Court MACT Cannot Decide Personal Accident Claims of Vehicle Owners: Madras High Court Sets Aside Rs. 15 Lakh Award Specific Performance | Sale Agreement to Cheat Stamp Duty Is Void, But Buyer Still Gets Money Back: Madras High Court Higher Degree Cannot Substitute Essential Work Experience; Preference Operates Only Among Eligible Candidates: Supreme Court Legal Representatives Aggrieved By Arbitral Award Must Challenge It Under Section 34 Arbitration Act, Not Article 227: Supreme Court

Rights of Declared Candidates Upheld: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Election Participation Despite Disqualification Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court has made a significant decision regarding the election process of the Supreme Court Bar Association Multi-State Cooperative Group-Housing Society Ltd. The court upheld the rights of the declared candidates to participate in the elections, despite a disqualification order by the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies.

The petition, challenging the authority and jurisdiction of the disqualification order, was heard by the Acting Chief Justice and Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora. The order in question had disqualified 15 elected members of the outgoing Board from being elected as members for a period of five years.

In a statement that underscores the essence of the judgment, the Court observed, “The impugned order shall operate prospectively,” indicating that the rights of the candidates declared in the final list published on January 11, 2024, remain unaffected by the disqualification order.

The petitioners argued that the order was without jurisdiction, contrary to the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Rules, 2002, and that it was inappropriate to exclude candidates on the eve of the elections. The Court noted the completion of the nomination process and the publication of the final list of candidates, emphasizing the importance of these procedural milestones in the election process.

Respondent Nos. 7 and 8, who appeared in person, argued for the legitimacy of the disqualification order under Section 43(2) of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. However, the Court’s decision focused on the timing and procedure followed in the election process, particularly the role and declarations made by the Returning Officer.

Ultimately, the High Court directed that the elections be conducted as per the final list of candidates, including those who were subject to the disqualification order. However, the Court reserved the right for the petitioners, as well as the respondents, to pursue their statutory remedies against the impugned order.

Date of Decision: 16th January, 2024

ARUN KUMAR MISHRA & ORS. VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

 

Latest Legal News