Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Rights of Declared Candidates Upheld: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Election Participation Despite Disqualification Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court has made a significant decision regarding the election process of the Supreme Court Bar Association Multi-State Cooperative Group-Housing Society Ltd. The court upheld the rights of the declared candidates to participate in the elections, despite a disqualification order by the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies.

The petition, challenging the authority and jurisdiction of the disqualification order, was heard by the Acting Chief Justice and Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora. The order in question had disqualified 15 elected members of the outgoing Board from being elected as members for a period of five years.

In a statement that underscores the essence of the judgment, the Court observed, “The impugned order shall operate prospectively,” indicating that the rights of the candidates declared in the final list published on January 11, 2024, remain unaffected by the disqualification order.

The petitioners argued that the order was without jurisdiction, contrary to the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Rules, 2002, and that it was inappropriate to exclude candidates on the eve of the elections. The Court noted the completion of the nomination process and the publication of the final list of candidates, emphasizing the importance of these procedural milestones in the election process.

Respondent Nos. 7 and 8, who appeared in person, argued for the legitimacy of the disqualification order under Section 43(2) of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. However, the Court’s decision focused on the timing and procedure followed in the election process, particularly the role and declarations made by the Returning Officer.

Ultimately, the High Court directed that the elections be conducted as per the final list of candidates, including those who were subject to the disqualification order. However, the Court reserved the right for the petitioners, as well as the respondents, to pursue their statutory remedies against the impugned order.

Date of Decision: 16th January, 2024

ARUN KUMAR MISHRA & ORS. VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

 

Latest Legal News