Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

Rights of Declared Candidates Upheld: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Election Participation Despite Disqualification Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court has made a significant decision regarding the election process of the Supreme Court Bar Association Multi-State Cooperative Group-Housing Society Ltd. The court upheld the rights of the declared candidates to participate in the elections, despite a disqualification order by the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies.

The petition, challenging the authority and jurisdiction of the disqualification order, was heard by the Acting Chief Justice and Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora. The order in question had disqualified 15 elected members of the outgoing Board from being elected as members for a period of five years.

In a statement that underscores the essence of the judgment, the Court observed, “The impugned order shall operate prospectively,” indicating that the rights of the candidates declared in the final list published on January 11, 2024, remain unaffected by the disqualification order.

The petitioners argued that the order was without jurisdiction, contrary to the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Rules, 2002, and that it was inappropriate to exclude candidates on the eve of the elections. The Court noted the completion of the nomination process and the publication of the final list of candidates, emphasizing the importance of these procedural milestones in the election process.

Respondent Nos. 7 and 8, who appeared in person, argued for the legitimacy of the disqualification order under Section 43(2) of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. However, the Court’s decision focused on the timing and procedure followed in the election process, particularly the role and declarations made by the Returning Officer.

Ultimately, the High Court directed that the elections be conducted as per the final list of candidates, including those who were subject to the disqualification order. However, the Court reserved the right for the petitioners, as well as the respondents, to pursue their statutory remedies against the impugned order.

Date of Decision: 16th January, 2024

ARUN KUMAR MISHRA & ORS. VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

 

Latest Legal News