Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Right Under Article 21 a Beacon for Bail: High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Lakhan Pal in a case involving charges of assault and attempted murder. The decision, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar, underscored the constitutional right under Article 21 and the condition of undertrial prisoners in India.

The crux of the judgment revolved around the petitioner’s right to bail under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The Court emphasized that prolonged incarceration without the commencement of trial infringes upon the fundamental right to life and personal liberty.

The FIR lodged against Lakhan Pal accused him of participating in an attack with a knife and glass bottles, allegedly driven by a previous grudge. The petitioner’s counsel contended his absence from CCTV footage at the crime scene and argued for bail, citing a similar concession granted to co-accused Sandeep.

Justice Brar took into account the petitioner’s time in custody since August 16, 2023, and the completion of the investigation with no commencement of trial. Citing the Supreme Court’s observations in ‘Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI’ on the plight of undertrial prisoners, the Court highlighted the necessity to minimize arrest and incarceration in a democratic society. The Court noted that further detention of the petitioner would be violative of Article 21, especially given the delay in the trial process.

The Court allowed the petition, granting regular bail to Lakhan Pal @ Lakhan Dhabi during the trial, subject to the furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistrate/Trial Court. The judgment made it clear that these observations should not influence the merits of the case in the trial court.

Date of Decision: February 16, 2024

Lakhan Pal @ Lakhan Dhabi Versus State of Haryana

 

Latest Legal News