Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Right Under Article 21 a Beacon for Bail: High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Lakhan Pal in a case involving charges of assault and attempted murder. The decision, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar, underscored the constitutional right under Article 21 and the condition of undertrial prisoners in India.

The crux of the judgment revolved around the petitioner’s right to bail under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The Court emphasized that prolonged incarceration without the commencement of trial infringes upon the fundamental right to life and personal liberty.

The FIR lodged against Lakhan Pal accused him of participating in an attack with a knife and glass bottles, allegedly driven by a previous grudge. The petitioner’s counsel contended his absence from CCTV footage at the crime scene and argued for bail, citing a similar concession granted to co-accused Sandeep.

Justice Brar took into account the petitioner’s time in custody since August 16, 2023, and the completion of the investigation with no commencement of trial. Citing the Supreme Court’s observations in ‘Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI’ on the plight of undertrial prisoners, the Court highlighted the necessity to minimize arrest and incarceration in a democratic society. The Court noted that further detention of the petitioner would be violative of Article 21, especially given the delay in the trial process.

The Court allowed the petition, granting regular bail to Lakhan Pal @ Lakhan Dhabi during the trial, subject to the furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistrate/Trial Court. The judgment made it clear that these observations should not influence the merits of the case in the trial court.

Date of Decision: February 16, 2024

Lakhan Pal @ Lakhan Dhabi Versus State of Haryana

 

Latest Legal News