MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |    

Right Under Article 21 a Beacon for Bail: High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Lakhan Pal in a case involving charges of assault and attempted murder. The decision, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar, underscored the constitutional right under Article 21 and the condition of undertrial prisoners in India.

The crux of the judgment revolved around the petitioner’s right to bail under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The Court emphasized that prolonged incarceration without the commencement of trial infringes upon the fundamental right to life and personal liberty.

The FIR lodged against Lakhan Pal accused him of participating in an attack with a knife and glass bottles, allegedly driven by a previous grudge. The petitioner’s counsel contended his absence from CCTV footage at the crime scene and argued for bail, citing a similar concession granted to co-accused Sandeep.

Justice Brar took into account the petitioner’s time in custody since August 16, 2023, and the completion of the investigation with no commencement of trial. Citing the Supreme Court’s observations in ‘Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI’ on the plight of undertrial prisoners, the Court highlighted the necessity to minimize arrest and incarceration in a democratic society. The Court noted that further detention of the petitioner would be violative of Article 21, especially given the delay in the trial process.

The Court allowed the petition, granting regular bail to Lakhan Pal @ Lakhan Dhabi during the trial, subject to the furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistrate/Trial Court. The judgment made it clear that these observations should not influence the merits of the case in the trial court.

Date of Decision: February 16, 2024

Lakhan Pal @ Lakhan Dhabi Versus State of Haryana

 

Similar News