UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Right Under Article 21 a Beacon for Bail: High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Lakhan Pal in a case involving charges of assault and attempted murder. The decision, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar, underscored the constitutional right under Article 21 and the condition of undertrial prisoners in India.

The crux of the judgment revolved around the petitioner’s right to bail under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The Court emphasized that prolonged incarceration without the commencement of trial infringes upon the fundamental right to life and personal liberty.

The FIR lodged against Lakhan Pal accused him of participating in an attack with a knife and glass bottles, allegedly driven by a previous grudge. The petitioner’s counsel contended his absence from CCTV footage at the crime scene and argued for bail, citing a similar concession granted to co-accused Sandeep.

Justice Brar took into account the petitioner’s time in custody since August 16, 2023, and the completion of the investigation with no commencement of trial. Citing the Supreme Court’s observations in ‘Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI’ on the plight of undertrial prisoners, the Court highlighted the necessity to minimize arrest and incarceration in a democratic society. The Court noted that further detention of the petitioner would be violative of Article 21, especially given the delay in the trial process.

The Court allowed the petition, granting regular bail to Lakhan Pal @ Lakhan Dhabi during the trial, subject to the furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistrate/Trial Court. The judgment made it clear that these observations should not influence the merits of the case in the trial court.

Date of Decision: February 16, 2024

Lakhan Pal @ Lakhan Dhabi Versus State of Haryana

 

Latest Legal News