Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

“Release on Probation Serves the Dual Purpose of Deterrence and Reformation,” Says Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed an application for leave to appeal against the release of five convicts on probation. The convicts were found guilty under Section 323 IPC and were released under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.

Justice Arun Monga, presiding over the case, stated, “Keeping the aforesaid in mind, I am thus of the view that the release of the convicts on probation, as in the present case, can indeed serve the dual purpose of deterrence and reformation.” [Para 12]

The applicant, Nasri, had sought to appeal against the release of the convicts, arguing that they should have been convicted under additional sections and should not have been released on probation. The convicts were ordered to pay a compensation of Rs. 5,000/- each to the injured applicant. [Para 1, 4]

The High Court elaborated on the principles and objectives of criminal law, emphasizing the focus on the reformation of offenders. Justice Monga discussed various factors that should be considered while granting probation, such as the nature of the offense, individual circumstances, and the potential for rehabilitation. [Para 11, 11.1-11.4]

In dismissing the application for leave to appeal, the Court found that the release on probation served the dual purpose of deterrence and reformation. “By allowing release on probation, the aim herein is to deter their future criminal conduct, while also providing an opportunity for reform and rehabilitation,” Justice Monga observed. [Para 12, 13]

In a directive aimed at lower courts, the High Court ordered that the principles and provisions related to probation be circulated to all courts in the States of Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh. “The principles enunciated in para 11 and its sub-paras above and the relevant provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 be brought to the knowledge of all the learned Judges in the district judiciary,” the order stated. [Para 14]

This landmark judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications in how probation is considered and granted in criminal cases across Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh.

Date of Decision: 17.07.2023

Nasri  vs State of Haryana and others            

Latest Legal News