Order Taking Cognizance Must Reflect Application Of Mind; Section 197 CrPC Sanction Mandatory For Prosecuting Public Servants: Karnataka High Court Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Partially Against Specific Defendants Or Properties; Limitation Is A Triable Issue: Telangana High Court Employee Having National Trade Certificate & Prior Experience To Be Treated As 'Highly Skilled' For Compensation: Orissa High Court Insurance Company Entitled To Subpoena Investigating Officer For Vehicle Records When Insured Is Untraceable: Madras High Court Seller's Fraudulent Conduct & Non-Disclosure Of Mortgage Justify Refund Of Advance Sale Consideration: Kerala High Court Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Filed By Partner On Behalf Of Firm Maintainable Even Without Specific Authorization Letter: Gujarat High Court Extension Of Remand Beyond 180 Days Under NDPS Act Requires Public Prosecutor's Independent Report, Not Just IO's Request: Andhra Pradesh High Court Orissa Grama Panchayats Act | No Bar On Rescheduling No-Confidence Motion Meeting Before Its Commencement: High Court Non-Preparation Of ‘Nil’ Seizure List After Searching Raiding Officer Not Fatal To NDPS Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Registration Of Trademark Confers Exclusive Right To Sue For Infringement Irrespective Of Whether Mark Is In Use: Delhi High Court Presence Of Magistrate Not Mandatory For Recording Dying Declaration; Conviction Can Be Based On DD Recorded By Police: Bombay High Court Routine Bank Transfers Between Spouses For Daily Needs Are Gratuitous Payments, Not Recoverable As Entrusted Funds: Kerala High Court Clerical Lapses Under Work Pressure Amount To Dereliction Of Duty, Not Crime: Madras High Court Quashes Corruption Case Against Deputy BDO Burden Of Proving Sale Deed Is Bona Fide Lies On Beneficiary If Executant Is Illiterate Or Vulnerable: Andhra Pradesh High Court Employee Cannot Take Advantage Of Own Delay; Employer Not Required To Preserve Disciplinary Records For Eternity: Bombay High Court Deadline To File Evidence Under Rule 45 Trade Marks Rules Is Directory, Registrar Can Extend Time Under Section 131: Bombay High Court Exclusion Of Interest In Insurance Policy Is Conditional; Insurer Must Plead & Prove Employer's Failure To Comply With Act To Avoid Liability: Kerala High Court Practicing Lawyer Entitled To Interim Maintenance From Husband If Income Is Insufficient To Maintain Standard Of Living: Orissa High Court Section 138 NI Act Offences Can Be Compounded At Any Stage Even After Dismissal Of Revision Or Appeal: Madras High Court Unsuccessful Party Seeking Post-Award Interim Relief Under Section 9 Faces 'Higher Threshold', Must Show Rare & Compelling Circumstances: Bombay High Court

“Release on Probation Serves the Dual Purpose of Deterrence and Reformation,” Says Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed an application for leave to appeal against the release of five convicts on probation. The convicts were found guilty under Section 323 IPC and were released under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.

Justice Arun Monga, presiding over the case, stated, “Keeping the aforesaid in mind, I am thus of the view that the release of the convicts on probation, as in the present case, can indeed serve the dual purpose of deterrence and reformation.” [Para 12]

The applicant, Nasri, had sought to appeal against the release of the convicts, arguing that they should have been convicted under additional sections and should not have been released on probation. The convicts were ordered to pay a compensation of Rs. 5,000/- each to the injured applicant. [Para 1, 4]

The High Court elaborated on the principles and objectives of criminal law, emphasizing the focus on the reformation of offenders. Justice Monga discussed various factors that should be considered while granting probation, such as the nature of the offense, individual circumstances, and the potential for rehabilitation. [Para 11, 11.1-11.4]

In dismissing the application for leave to appeal, the Court found that the release on probation served the dual purpose of deterrence and reformation. “By allowing release on probation, the aim herein is to deter their future criminal conduct, while also providing an opportunity for reform and rehabilitation,” Justice Monga observed. [Para 12, 13]

In a directive aimed at lower courts, the High Court ordered that the principles and provisions related to probation be circulated to all courts in the States of Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh. “The principles enunciated in para 11 and its sub-paras above and the relevant provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 be brought to the knowledge of all the learned Judges in the district judiciary,” the order stated. [Para 14]

This landmark judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications in how probation is considered and granted in criminal cases across Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh.

Date of Decision: 17.07.2023

Nasri  vs State of Haryana and others            

Latest Legal News