Promotees Allowed to Challenge Provisional Seniority List in Dispute Between Direct Recruitment and Promotion: Kerala High Court Frivolous Defenses Cannot Justify Leave to Defend Under Order XXXVII CPC Delhi High Court Candidates Merely Enrolled in Final Year B.V.Sc. Program Ineligible for Veterinary Officer Recruitment: Rajasthan High Court Manufacturing or Sale of Garments Does Not Attract Copyright Protection; Procedural Violations Under Trade Marks Act Renders Prosecution Unsustainable: P&H High Court Ownership Alone Is Not Sufficient to Maintain Eviction Suit; Plaintiff Must Qualify as a Lessor Under Lease Agreement: Calcutta High Court Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With in a Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law: AP High Court Chain of Circumstances Broken: Inferences Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kerala High Court Bail | Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 of the Constitution: Bombay High Court Encroachment on a Common Lane Gives Rise to Recurring Cause of Action: Madras High Court Holds Limitation Act Inapplicable to Pathway Disputes Reproductive Autonomy Includes the Right to Abort Without Spousal Consent: P&H High Court Access to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 is Not an Absolute Bar Against MSEFC Awards: Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on Writ Jurisdiction to Larger Bench Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Title and Mortgage Disputes Under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Principle of Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Supreme Court Panchayat Law | Mandatory Compliance With Section 34 And Rule 3 Is Non-Negotiable In Resignation Cases: Bombay High Court Quashes Resignation Of Upa-Sarpanch Recovery of Bullet Fired from Accused’s Weapon Crucial: PH High Court Reaffirms Conviction in Murder Case Injured Witness Evidence Carries Built-in Reliability Unless Contradicted Significantly: Kerala High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka High Court Issuance of Summons Under Section 91 CrPC During Preliminary Verification is Without Jurisdiction: High Court of J&K and Ladakh Article 21 Prevails Over NDPS Act’s Section 37 Restrictions in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Once a Property is Waqf, It Remains Waqf Perpetually: Calcutta High Court Affirms No Secular Ownership Can Derive from Waqf Properties Surveillance Without Opportunity to Object Violates Articles 14, 19, and 21: Allahabad High Court Quashes Class-B History Sheets Mandatory Provisions of Order XXI CPC Were Violated, Rendering the Auction Sale Illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court

“Release on Probation Serves the Dual Purpose of Deterrence and Reformation,” Says Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed an application for leave to appeal against the release of five convicts on probation. The convicts were found guilty under Section 323 IPC and were released under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.

Justice Arun Monga, presiding over the case, stated, “Keeping the aforesaid in mind, I am thus of the view that the release of the convicts on probation, as in the present case, can indeed serve the dual purpose of deterrence and reformation.” [Para 12]

The applicant, Nasri, had sought to appeal against the release of the convicts, arguing that they should have been convicted under additional sections and should not have been released on probation. The convicts were ordered to pay a compensation of Rs. 5,000/- each to the injured applicant. [Para 1, 4]

The High Court elaborated on the principles and objectives of criminal law, emphasizing the focus on the reformation of offenders. Justice Monga discussed various factors that should be considered while granting probation, such as the nature of the offense, individual circumstances, and the potential for rehabilitation. [Para 11, 11.1-11.4]

In dismissing the application for leave to appeal, the Court found that the release on probation served the dual purpose of deterrence and reformation. “By allowing release on probation, the aim herein is to deter their future criminal conduct, while also providing an opportunity for reform and rehabilitation,” Justice Monga observed. [Para 12, 13]

In a directive aimed at lower courts, the High Court ordered that the principles and provisions related to probation be circulated to all courts in the States of Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh. “The principles enunciated in para 11 and its sub-paras above and the relevant provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 be brought to the knowledge of all the learned Judges in the district judiciary,” the order stated. [Para 14]

This landmark judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications in how probation is considered and granted in criminal cases across Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh.

Date of Decision: 17.07.2023

Nasri  vs State of Haryana and others            

Similar News