Absence of Videography Alone Not Sufficient For Bail When Custody is Less Than a Year: Delhi High Court Refuses Bail in Commercial Quantity Heroin Use of Permitted Synthetic Colour in Dal Masur Still Constitutes Adulteration: Punjab & Haryana High Court Uphold Conviction Penalty Must Not Result in Civil Death of Professionals: Delhi High Court Reduces Two-Year Suspension of Insolvency Professional, Citing Disproportionate Punishment Right of Cross-Examination is Statutory, Cannot Be Denied When Documents Are Exhibited Later: Chhattisgarh High Court Allows Re-Cross-Examination Compounding after Adjudication is Impermissible under FEMA: Calcutta High Court Declines Post-Adjudication Compounding Plea Tears of a Child Speak Louder Than Words: Bombay HC Confirms Life Term for Man Who Raped 4-Year-Old Alleged Dowry Death After Forced Remarriage: Allahabad High Court Finds No Evidence of Strangulation or Demand “Even If Executant Has No Title, Registrar Must Register the Document If Formalities Are Met” — Supreme Court  Declares Tamil Nadu's Rule 55A(i) Ultra Vires the Registration Act, 1908 Res Judicata Is Not Optional – It’s Public Policy: Supreme Court Slams SEBI for Passing Second Final Order in Fraud Case Against Vital Communications Ltd A Person Has Died… Insurance Company Cannot Escape Liability Without Proving Policy Violation: Supreme Court Slams High Court for Exonerating Insurer in Fatal Accident Case Calling Someone by Caste Name Is Not Enough – It Must Be Publicly Done to Attract SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Acquits All in Jharkhand Land Dispute Case Broken Promises Don’t Make Rape – Mature Adults in Long-Term Relationships Must Accept Responsibility: Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case Against NRI Man Every Broken Relationship Can’t Be Branded Rape: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Retired Judge Accused of Sexual Exploitation on Promise of Marriage No Evidence, No Motive, Not Even Proof of Murder: Supreme Court Slams Conviction, Acquits Man Accused of Killing Wife After Two Years of Marriage You Can’t Assume Silence Is Consent: Supreme Court Sends Back ₹46 Lakh Insurance Dispute to NCDRC for Fresh Determination “Voyage Must Start and End Before Monsoon Sets In — But What If That’s Practically Impossible?” SC Rules Against Insurance Company in Shipping Dispute No Criminal Case Can Be Built on a Land Deal That’s Three Decades Old Without Specific Allegations: Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of FIR Against Ex-JK Housing Chief Just Giving a Call for Protest Doesn’t Make One Criminally Liable - Rail Roko Protest Quashed Against KCR Ex-CM: Telangana High Court Ends 13-Year-Old Proceedings for 2011 Telangana Agitation This Is Not a Case of Greed Simplicitor but a Celebration of Fraud: Karnataka High Court Grants Specific Performance, Slams Vendor for Violating Court Orders Limitation Period Under Section 18-A of Rent Act Mandatory, Delay Not Condonable – Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NRI Landlord's Eviction Against Tenant Custom Department Cannot Revive Time-Barred Show Cause Notices After Seven Years Without Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Notices to JBS Exports Public Property Cannot Be Managed Privately for Decades — Fair Price Shops in Hospitals Must Be Allotted by Auction: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Registered Sale Deed Alone Does Not Dismantle Prior Security Interest: Gauhati High Court Rejects Buyer’s Writ Against SARFAESI Action, Cites Expanded Statutory Definition Old OBC Certificates Won’t Work — Supreme Court Says Cut-Off Date Is Final in Rajasthan Civil Judge Exams

Reasoned Decision-Making is the Backbone of Administrative Law: Punjab and Haryana HC Sets Aside Non-Speaking Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment emphasizing the significance of reasoned decision-making in administrative law, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, led by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl, quashed a non-speaking order issued by respondent No. 2, the Punjab Education Development Board. This decision reaffirms the court's dedication to the principles of natural justice and the necessity for transparency in decision-making processes.

The Sukh Sagar Avenue Welfare Association, through a writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, challenged the validity of an office order and show-cause notice issued by the respondent. The petitioner argued that the impugned order lacked proper reasoning, failing to reflect an application of mind and violating the principles of natural justice.

The crux of the matter lay in the non-speaking nature of the order issued by respondent No. 2, which cancelled an agreement involving the running of three schools. The petitioner's contention was that this order did not demonstrate any reasoned application, an essential element in fair decision-making. Respondent No. 2, during the proceedings, acknowledged the need for a speaking order and agreed to reconsider the matter.

Justice Vikas Bahl's judgment highlighted several precedents underscoring the obligation of quasi-judicial and administrative authorities to provide reasons in their decisions. Citing judgments from the Supreme Court and previous High Court rulings, the Court observed:

"A reasoned decision is the lifeblood of fairness in the administrative process and facilitates judicial scrutiny, upholding the litigants' faith in the justice delivery system."

The Court pinpointed the inadequacies in the impugned order, noting its verbatim repetition from a previous order and lack of specific findings against the petitioner's responses. The absence of reasons in the order was deemed contrary to the established principles of law.

The Court set aside the impugned order, directing respondent No. 2 to pass a new speaking order considering the petitioner's replies. Additionally, the Court ordered the release of bona fide pending payments within a specified period and maintained the status quo until the fresh order's issuance.

Date of Decision: 13.02.2024

Sukh Sagar Avenue Welfare Association VS Punjab Education Development Board and others

Similar News