Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Reasoned Decision-Making is the Backbone of Administrative Law: Punjab and Haryana HC Sets Aside Non-Speaking Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment emphasizing the significance of reasoned decision-making in administrative law, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, led by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl, quashed a non-speaking order issued by respondent No. 2, the Punjab Education Development Board. This decision reaffirms the court's dedication to the principles of natural justice and the necessity for transparency in decision-making processes.

The Sukh Sagar Avenue Welfare Association, through a writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, challenged the validity of an office order and show-cause notice issued by the respondent. The petitioner argued that the impugned order lacked proper reasoning, failing to reflect an application of mind and violating the principles of natural justice.

The crux of the matter lay in the non-speaking nature of the order issued by respondent No. 2, which cancelled an agreement involving the running of three schools. The petitioner's contention was that this order did not demonstrate any reasoned application, an essential element in fair decision-making. Respondent No. 2, during the proceedings, acknowledged the need for a speaking order and agreed to reconsider the matter.

Justice Vikas Bahl's judgment highlighted several precedents underscoring the obligation of quasi-judicial and administrative authorities to provide reasons in their decisions. Citing judgments from the Supreme Court and previous High Court rulings, the Court observed:

"A reasoned decision is the lifeblood of fairness in the administrative process and facilitates judicial scrutiny, upholding the litigants' faith in the justice delivery system."

The Court pinpointed the inadequacies in the impugned order, noting its verbatim repetition from a previous order and lack of specific findings against the petitioner's responses. The absence of reasons in the order was deemed contrary to the established principles of law.

The Court set aside the impugned order, directing respondent No. 2 to pass a new speaking order considering the petitioner's replies. Additionally, the Court ordered the release of bona fide pending payments within a specified period and maintained the status quo until the fresh order's issuance.

Date of Decision: 13.02.2024

Sukh Sagar Avenue Welfare Association VS Punjab Education Development Board and others

Latest Legal News