NDPS | Mentioning FIR Number On Memos Before Registration Makes the Entire Recovery Suspect: Himachal Pradesh High Court MACT | Once Deceased Is Proven To Be Skilled Worker, Deputy Commissioner's Wage Notification Is Applicable: P&H HC Bank’s Technical Excuses Can’t Override Employee’s Right to Ex Gratia Under Old Circulars: Bombay High Court Slams Canara Bank’s Rejection of Claim Once Worker Files Affidavit of Unemployment, Burden Shifts to Employer to Prove Gainful Employment: Delhi High Court Grants 17B Relief Despite 12-Year Delay Specific Relief Act | Readiness and Willingness Must Be Real and Continuous — Plaintiffs Cannot Withhold Funds and Blame the Seller: Bombay High Court Even If Claim Is Styled Under Section 163A, It Can Be Treated Under Section 166 If Negligence Is Pleaded And Higher Compensation Is Claimed: Supreme Court When Cheating Flows from One Criminal Conspiracy, the Law Does Not Demand 1852 FIRs: Supreme Court Upholds Single FIR in Multi-Crore Cheating Case Initiating Multiple FIRs on Same Facts is Impermissible: Supreme Court Quashes Parallel FIRs and Grants Bail Protection in Refund Case Limitation Act | Quasi-Judicial Bodies Cannot Invoke Section 5 Principles Without Express Statutory Grant: Supreme Court Arbitration Act | Commencement of Proceedings Triggered by Notice Receipt, Not Section 11 Filing: Supreme Court Strong and Cogent Evidence Must Exist at the Threshold to Deny Bail Under Section 319 CrPC: Supreme Court Appellate Court Under Section 37 Cannot Sit in Appeal Over Arbitral Award on Merits: Supreme Court Affidavit Ratifying Power of Attorney Cannot Be Disowned Later: Supreme Court Orders Specific Performance Despite Earlier Revocation Claims No Law Empowers a Corporation to Haunt a Retiree: Supreme Court Quashes Post-Retirement Disciplinary Action for Want of Jurisdiction Mere Expectation of Higher Bids Can't Justify Cancelling a Valid Auction: Supreme Court Quashes GDA’s Arbitrary Rejection of Highest Bidder Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21, Even in Grave Economic Offences: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Arvind Dham in ₹673 Crore PMLA Case Article 14 | ‘Rules of the Game Cannot Be Changed Midstream’: Supreme Court Quashes Punjab’s Modified Sports Quota Policy for MBBS Admissions Rules of the Game Cannot Be Changed Midway: Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s Retrospective Recruitment Amendment "Imaginary Ghost" - Court Permits Karthigai Deepam at Thiruparankundram ‘Deepathoon’: Madras High Court 353 IPC | Continuing Prosecution Against Citizens Despite Statutory Findings of Police Atrocities Is Abuse of Process: Kerala High Court Court Cannot Compel Plaintiff to Continue Suit Where No Liberty to File Fresh Suit is Sought: Bombay High Court Claim for Demurrage is Not a Crystallized Debt—Only an Unadjudicated Right to Sue: Andhra Pradesh High Court Declared Foreign Nationals Have No Right to Reside in India: Gauhati High Court Upholds Expulsion of Bangladeshi Woman Without Requiring Deportation Protocols

Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail to First-Time Offender in NDPS Case: Right to Speedy Trial

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, in a judgment delivered on November 30, 2023, granted bail to Kabal Singh, a first-time offender facing charges under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The case (CRM-M-48563-2023) involved the recovery of intoxicating tablets.

The court, while addressing allegations of non-compliance with mandatory provisions of Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act, emphasized the importance of the accused’s right to a speedy trial, as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The judgment stated, “In this situation, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted to an extent in view of the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which provides for the right to a speedy trial, and the case of the petitioner can be considered for the grant of bail.”

Kabal Singh had been in custody since June 8, 2022, with none of the nine prosecution witnesses having been examined as of the judgment date. This fact, coupled with his first-time offender status and the absence of any other cases registered against him, led the court to grant him bail.

The court’s decision drew from legal precedents, including the judgments in Nitish Adhikary @ Bapan v. The State of West Bengal and Hasanujjaman & others v. The State of West Bengal. These cases highlighted the importance of considering the period of custody and the absence of criminal antecedents when granting bail in NDPS cases.

Kabal Singh was ordered to be released on bail, subject to certain conditions, including regular appearances before the police station and the deposit of a substantial sum as a financial guarantee to ensure his participation in the trial.

Date of Decision: November 30, 2023

Kabal Singh. VS State of Punjab.       

Latest Legal News