Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail to First-Time Offender in NDPS Case: Right to Speedy Trial

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, in a judgment delivered on November 30, 2023, granted bail to Kabal Singh, a first-time offender facing charges under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The case (CRM-M-48563-2023) involved the recovery of intoxicating tablets.

The court, while addressing allegations of non-compliance with mandatory provisions of Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act, emphasized the importance of the accused’s right to a speedy trial, as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The judgment stated, “In this situation, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted to an extent in view of the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which provides for the right to a speedy trial, and the case of the petitioner can be considered for the grant of bail.”

Kabal Singh had been in custody since June 8, 2022, with none of the nine prosecution witnesses having been examined as of the judgment date. This fact, coupled with his first-time offender status and the absence of any other cases registered against him, led the court to grant him bail.

The court’s decision drew from legal precedents, including the judgments in Nitish Adhikary @ Bapan v. The State of West Bengal and Hasanujjaman & others v. The State of West Bengal. These cases highlighted the importance of considering the period of custody and the absence of criminal antecedents when granting bail in NDPS cases.

Kabal Singh was ordered to be released on bail, subject to certain conditions, including regular appearances before the police station and the deposit of a substantial sum as a financial guarantee to ensure his participation in the trial.

Date of Decision: November 30, 2023

Kabal Singh. VS State of Punjab.       

Latest Legal News