Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes FIR and Final Report for Violation of COVID-19 Regulations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed the First Information Report (FIR) and final report filed against Singer Gurnam Bhullar and others for alleged violations of COVID-19 regulations. The court held that the registration of the FIR and subsequent proceedings were not permissible under the law.

Justice Gurbir Singh, presiding over the case, emphasized the mandatory nature of Section 195(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) and stated, “No court shall take cognizance of the offense punishable under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) unless a written complaint is made by the concerned public servant.” The court highlighted that the prosecution failed to comply with this requirement, rendering the trial and conviction void ab initio.

The case involved allegations that Singer Gurnam Bhullar and his companions had gathered at Prime Mall without permission during the COVID-19 pandemic and were shooting a film without observing necessary precautions. The FIR was registered based on reliable information provided by a police officer.

The court further emphasized that the COVID-19 pandemic constituted an extraordinary situation, necessitating strict compliance with government instructions and guidelines. The activities during the pandemic required permission from the concerned District Magistrate and adherence to the prescribed guidelines.

Justice Gurbir Singh stated, “The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic and the ensuing regulations imposed an extraordinary situation. No activity could take place without permission, subject to observing directions for preventing Covid-19 pandemic as issued by the Government.” The court referred to several precedent cases, including C. Muniappan vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Jiwan Kumar vs. State of Punjab, which supported the mandatory requirement of a written complaint by the concerned public servant for registering an FIR.

High court quashed the FIR and final report filed under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C., declaring them impermissible under the law. This ruling brings clarity on the necessity of following proper legal procedures in registering offenses related to COVID-19 violations.

Date of Decision: 05.07.2023

Gurnam Singh Bhullar vs State of Punjab 

Latest Legal News