MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes FIR and Final Report for Violation of COVID-19 Regulations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed the First Information Report (FIR) and final report filed against Singer Gurnam Bhullar and others for alleged violations of COVID-19 regulations. The court held that the registration of the FIR and subsequent proceedings were not permissible under the law.

Justice Gurbir Singh, presiding over the case, emphasized the mandatory nature of Section 195(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) and stated, “No court shall take cognizance of the offense punishable under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) unless a written complaint is made by the concerned public servant.” The court highlighted that the prosecution failed to comply with this requirement, rendering the trial and conviction void ab initio.

The case involved allegations that Singer Gurnam Bhullar and his companions had gathered at Prime Mall without permission during the COVID-19 pandemic and were shooting a film without observing necessary precautions. The FIR was registered based on reliable information provided by a police officer.

The court further emphasized that the COVID-19 pandemic constituted an extraordinary situation, necessitating strict compliance with government instructions and guidelines. The activities during the pandemic required permission from the concerned District Magistrate and adherence to the prescribed guidelines.

Justice Gurbir Singh stated, “The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic and the ensuing regulations imposed an extraordinary situation. No activity could take place without permission, subject to observing directions for preventing Covid-19 pandemic as issued by the Government.” The court referred to several precedent cases, including C. Muniappan vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Jiwan Kumar vs. State of Punjab, which supported the mandatory requirement of a written complaint by the concerned public servant for registering an FIR.

High court quashed the FIR and final report filed under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C., declaring them impermissible under the law. This ruling brings clarity on the necessity of following proper legal procedures in registering offenses related to COVID-19 violations.

Date of Decision: 05.07.2023

Gurnam Singh Bhullar vs State of Punjab 

Latest Legal News