Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Change in Category During Recruitment Process

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Date: May 4, 2023

In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a petition filed by Usha Rani, seeking a change in category during the recruitment process. The petitioner had approached the court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Haryana Staff Selection Commission to consider her DESM (Dependent of Ex-Servicemen) Certificate and declare her successful in the ESM/DESM category.

The petitioner had participated in the Common Eligibility Test (CET) for Group-C posts but failed to qualify. She claimed that she possessed an Eligibility Certificate as a DESM candidate but could not upload it due to network issues during the opportunity provided for modifying the uploaded particulars. Despite submitting representations to the respondent-Commission, her requests remained unanswered.

However, Justice Suvir Sehgal, presiding over the case, noted that the petitioner had applied and appeared as a General category candidate in the CET. The court emphasized that once a candidate applies under a specific category, they cannot be permitted to change their category during the selection or recruitment process. Citing previous judgments and an advertisement condition, the court held that the petitioner's request for a change in category could not be entertained.

Additionally, the court highlighted the petitioner's failure to upload the required DESM Eligibility Certificate and her inability to take advantage of multiple opportunities provided by the respondent-Commission to address grievances or correct uploaded data. The court concluded that the petitioner was responsible for the delay in seeking a change in category and that it was too late for her to request such a change.

As a result, the court found no merit in the petitioner's claims and dismissed the writ petition. This decision reaffirms the principle that candidates must adhere to the category they choose during the recruitment process and highlights the importance of timely compliance with application requirements.

Decided on: 04.05.2023

Usha Rani vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission and another 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Usha-Vs-Haryana-Staff-Selection-Commission.pdf"]

Latest Legal News