Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

Punjab and Haryana High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Change in Category During Recruitment Process

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Date: May 4, 2023

In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a petition filed by Usha Rani, seeking a change in category during the recruitment process. The petitioner had approached the court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Haryana Staff Selection Commission to consider her DESM (Dependent of Ex-Servicemen) Certificate and declare her successful in the ESM/DESM category.

The petitioner had participated in the Common Eligibility Test (CET) for Group-C posts but failed to qualify. She claimed that she possessed an Eligibility Certificate as a DESM candidate but could not upload it due to network issues during the opportunity provided for modifying the uploaded particulars. Despite submitting representations to the respondent-Commission, her requests remained unanswered.

However, Justice Suvir Sehgal, presiding over the case, noted that the petitioner had applied and appeared as a General category candidate in the CET. The court emphasized that once a candidate applies under a specific category, they cannot be permitted to change their category during the selection or recruitment process. Citing previous judgments and an advertisement condition, the court held that the petitioner's request for a change in category could not be entertained.

Additionally, the court highlighted the petitioner's failure to upload the required DESM Eligibility Certificate and her inability to take advantage of multiple opportunities provided by the respondent-Commission to address grievances or correct uploaded data. The court concluded that the petitioner was responsible for the delay in seeking a change in category and that it was too late for her to request such a change.

As a result, the court found no merit in the petitioner's claims and dismissed the writ petition. This decision reaffirms the principle that candidates must adhere to the category they choose during the recruitment process and highlights the importance of timely compliance with application requirements.

Decided on: 04.05.2023

Usha Rani vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission and another 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Usha-Vs-Haryana-Staff-Selection-Commission.pdf"]

Latest Legal News