Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Change in Category During Recruitment Process

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Date: May 4, 2023

In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a petition filed by Usha Rani, seeking a change in category during the recruitment process. The petitioner had approached the court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Haryana Staff Selection Commission to consider her DESM (Dependent of Ex-Servicemen) Certificate and declare her successful in the ESM/DESM category.

The petitioner had participated in the Common Eligibility Test (CET) for Group-C posts but failed to qualify. She claimed that she possessed an Eligibility Certificate as a DESM candidate but could not upload it due to network issues during the opportunity provided for modifying the uploaded particulars. Despite submitting representations to the respondent-Commission, her requests remained unanswered.

However, Justice Suvir Sehgal, presiding over the case, noted that the petitioner had applied and appeared as a General category candidate in the CET. The court emphasized that once a candidate applies under a specific category, they cannot be permitted to change their category during the selection or recruitment process. Citing previous judgments and an advertisement condition, the court held that the petitioner's request for a change in category could not be entertained.

Additionally, the court highlighted the petitioner's failure to upload the required DESM Eligibility Certificate and her inability to take advantage of multiple opportunities provided by the respondent-Commission to address grievances or correct uploaded data. The court concluded that the petitioner was responsible for the delay in seeking a change in category and that it was too late for her to request such a change.

As a result, the court found no merit in the petitioner's claims and dismissed the writ petition. This decision reaffirms the principle that candidates must adhere to the category they choose during the recruitment process and highlights the importance of timely compliance with application requirements.

Decided on: 04.05.2023

Usha Rani vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission and another 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Usha-Vs-Haryana-Staff-Selection-Commission.pdf"]

Latest Legal News