Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Article 21 Rights Not Absolute In Cases Threatening National Security: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted In Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case A Computer Programme That Solves a Technical Problem Is Not Barred Under Section 3(k): Madras High Court Allows Patent for Software-Based Data Lineage System Premature Auction Without 30-Day Redemption Violates Section 176 and Bank’s Own Terms: Orissa High Court Quashes Canara Bank’s Gold Loan Sale Courts Can’t Stall Climate-Resilient Public Projects: Madras High Court Lifts Status Quo on Eco Park, Pond Works at Race Club Land No Cross-Examination, No Conviction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Penalty for Violating Principles of Natural Justice ITAT Was Wrong in Disregarding Statements Under Oath, But Additions Unsustainable Without Corroborative Evidence: Madras High Court Deduction Theory Under Old Land Acquisition Law Has No Place Under 2013 Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Compensation for Metro Land Acquisition UIT Cannot Turn Around After Issuing Pattas, It's Estopped Now: Rajasthan High Court Private Doctor’s Widow Eligible for COVID Insurance if Duty Proven: Supreme Court Rebukes Narrow Interpretation of COVID-Era Orders Smaller Benches Cannot Override Constitution Bench Authority Under The Guise Of Clarification: Supreme Court Criticises Judicial Indiscipline Public Premises Act, 1971 | PP Act Overrides State Rent Control Laws for All Tenancies; Suhas Pophale Overruled: Supreme Court Court Has No Power To Reduce Sentence Below Statutory Minimum Under NDPS Act: Supreme Court Denies Relief To Young Mother Convicted With 23.5 kg Ganja Non-Compliance With Section 52-A Is Not Per Se Fatal: Supreme Court Clarifies Law On Sampling Procedure Under NDPS Act MBA Degree Doesn’t Feed the Stomach: Delhi High Court Says Wife’s Qualification No Ground to Deny Maintenance

Prolonged Incarceration Should Not Become 'Punishment Without Trial’: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Manish Sisodia

30 August 2024 12:07 PM

By: sayum


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India granted bail to Manish Sisodia, former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi, who had been incarcerated for over 17 months in connection with the Delhi Excise Policy case. The judgment, delivered by a bench led by Justice B.R. Gavai, underscores the constitutional mandate of a speedy trial and the protection of personal liberty, criticizing the prolonged delay in the commencement of Sisodia’s trial.

Manish Sisodia was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 26th February 2023 and subsequently by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on 9th March 2023, in connection with alleged irregularities in the framing and implementation of Delhi’s Excise Policy for 2021-22. The CBI registered an FIR against Sisodia on 17th August 2022, followed by the ED’s case on 22nd August 2022, stemming from the CBI’s predicate offense. Sisodia’s previous bail applications had been rejected by both the trial court and the Delhi High Court, leading to his appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court placed significant emphasis on the right to a speedy trial as an essential facet of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The Court observed, "Detention or jail before being pronounced guilty of an offense should not become punishment without trial. When the trial is not proceeding for reasons not attributable to the accused, the court, unless there are good reasons, may well be guided to exercise the power to grant bail."

The Court criticized the lower courts for not adequately addressing the delay in the trial proceedings, noting that despite assurances from the prosecution, the trial had not even commenced after 17 months of Sisodia’s incarceration. The bench noted, "The right to bail in cases of delay, coupled with incarceration for a long period, should be read into Section 439 of the Code and Section 45 of the PMLA."

The Supreme Court dismissed the prosecution’s argument that Sisodia was responsible for the delays due to the numerous applications filed by him. The Court found that many of these applications were legitimate requests for access to documents and evidence necessary for his defense, and observed that the trial court had allowed all such applications.

The bench reaffirmed that the principles of bail must prioritize the accused's right to liberty unless compelling reasons justify extended detention. The Court held that, given the circumstances, the statutory conditions under Section 45 of the PMLA should be relaxed to allow Sisodia's release on bail.

Justice B.R. Gavai emphasized, "The right to speedy trial and the right to liberty are sacrosanct rights. On denial of these rights, the trial court as well as the High Court ought to have given due weightage to this factor."

The Supreme Court’s decision to grant bail to Manish Sisodia marks a pivotal moment in reinforcing the judiciary's commitment to upholding constitutional rights, particularly the right to a speedy trial. By setting aside the Delhi High Court’s order, the judgment sends a strong message about the importance of balancing the interests of justice with the protection of individual liberties, especially in cases where trial delays are beyond the control of the accused.

Date of Decision: 9th August 2024

Manish Sisodia vs. Directorate of Enforcement

Latest Legal News