Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Proceedings Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Are of a Summary Nature and Intended to Enable Destitute Wives and Children to Get Maintenance in a Speedy Manner – Allahabad High Court Enhances Maintenance in Light of Husband’s Income

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

In a significant judgment today, the Allahabad High Court addressed issues surrounding maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), focusing on preventing vagrancy and ensuring financial support for wives and children who are unable to maintain themselves.

The revision petition arose from a dispute over maintenance initially awarded by the Family Court, Kanpur, which granted Rs. 5,000 per month to the wife and Rs. 3,000 per month to the daughter. The revisionists challenged the adequacy of the maintenance, citing the husband’s substantial income from his pharmaceutical business and other assets, including agricultural land.

The High Court meticulously reviewed the husband’s financial status, scrutinizing company revenues, profit shares, and his significant role as a director and major shareholder. Contrary to the claims of financial incapacity by the husband, the court noted a considerable income inconsistency with his declared earnings. The judgment referenced several Supreme Court rulings emphasizing the underlying purpose of Section 125 Cr.P.C.—to provide swift and necessary relief to prevent destitution among wives and children.

Income Review: The Court estimated the husband’s annual income at approximately Rs. 7,50,000 based on the profits and overall financial health of his company.

Maintenance Justification: Drawing on legal precedents, the Court highlighted that the capacity to earn is distinct from actual earnings and that maintenance should reflect realistic and current financial capabilities.

Educational Expenses: Special consideration was given to the daughter’s educational expenses, reinforcing the need for adequate support to ensure her continued education without disruption.

Concluding its findings, the High Court significantly increased the maintenance payments. The wife’s maintenance was set at Rs. 18,500 per month, and the daughter’s at Rs. 10,000 per month, effective from the date of the original maintenance application. The revised total monthly maintenance amount was ordered at Rs. 28,500. The judgment also specified a schedule for arrears and regular monthly payments, ensuring timely financial support.

 Date of Decision: April 10, 2024

Smt. Aparna Kushwaha And Another vs. State of U.P. and Another

 

Latest Legal News