Conversion for Reservation Benefits Is a Fraud on the Constitution: Supreme Court Rejects SC Certificate for Reconverted Christian Patent Office Guidelines Must Be Followed for Consistency in Decisions: Madras High Court Limitation Cannot Obstruct Justice When Parties Consent to Extensions: Madhya Pradesh High Court Additional Fees Are Incentives, Not Penalties: Orissa High Court Upholds Central Motor Vehicles Rules Amendment Interpretation of Tender Eligibility Criteria Lies with Tendering Authority: Gujrat High Court Upholds Discharge of Tender Complaints Were Contradictory and Did Not Establish Prima Facie Case for SC/ST Act Charges: J&K HC Insurance Cover Notes Hold Policy Validity Unless Proven Otherwise: Kerala High Court Upholds Compensation in Fatal Accident Case Article 21 Of Constitution Applies Irrespective Of Nature Of Crime. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Amounts To Punishment Without Adjudication: Calcutta HC Concept Of 'Liberal Approach' Cannot Be Used To Jettison The Substantive Law Of Limitation: Delhi High Court Limitation is Not Always a Mixed Question of Fact and Law: Bombay High Court Dismisses 31-Year-Old Specific Performance Suit as Time-Barred Intent Coupled with Trespass Constitutes Full Offence: Supreme Court Mere Possession of Bribe Money Insufficient Without Proof of Demand and Acceptance: Supreme Court Right to Promotion is Not a Fundamental Right; Retrospective Benefits Without Service Cannot Be Granted: Supreme Court of India Oral Gift Validity in Mohammedan Law: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Constructive Possession and Injunction Unauthorized Construction on Government Irrigation Land Must Be Demolished: Calcutta High Court Directs Sub-Divisional Officer High Court Upholds Dismissal of Petition Over Road Obstruction Due to Non-Prosecution Victim of Rape Has Right to Bodily Integrity and Reproductive Choice: Gujarat High Court Permits Termination of 24-Week Pregnancy Contradictions In Eyewitness Accounts And Suppression Of Crucial Evidence Weaken The Prosecution's Case: Telangana High Court High Court of Sikkim Sets Aside Trial Court’s Decision on Maintainability of Suit: Preliminary Issues Must Be Purely of Law Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Procedure, Says High Court Writ Petitions Against Civil Court Orders Must Be Under Article 227: Patna High Court Reiterates Jurisdictional Boundaries Kerala High Court Upholds Eviction, Rejects Sub-Tenant's Kudikidappu Claim Contractual Employment Does Not Confer Right to Regularization: Jharkhand High Court Divorced Wife Entitled to Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act for Past Domestic Violence: Bombay High Court Tenants Cannot Prescribe How Landlords Utilize Their Property: Delhi High Court Validates Eviction Labour Commissioner to Decide Petitioner’s Date of Birth Claim within Three Months, Ensuring Proper Verification and Consideration of Evidence: Uttarakhand High Court Concealment of Health Condition and False Allegations Amount to Cruelty: Gujarat High Court Upholds Divorce Decree Possession Implies Constructive Notice: Duty to Inquire Rests on Subsequent Purchasers: Supreme Court Clarifies Bona Fide Purchase Standards

Proceedings Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Are of a Summary Nature and Intended to Enable Destitute Wives and Children to Get Maintenance in a Speedy Manner – Allahabad High Court Enhances Maintenance in Light of Husband’s Income

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

In a significant judgment today, the Allahabad High Court addressed issues surrounding maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), focusing on preventing vagrancy and ensuring financial support for wives and children who are unable to maintain themselves.

The revision petition arose from a dispute over maintenance initially awarded by the Family Court, Kanpur, which granted Rs. 5,000 per month to the wife and Rs. 3,000 per month to the daughter. The revisionists challenged the adequacy of the maintenance, citing the husband’s substantial income from his pharmaceutical business and other assets, including agricultural land.

The High Court meticulously reviewed the husband’s financial status, scrutinizing company revenues, profit shares, and his significant role as a director and major shareholder. Contrary to the claims of financial incapacity by the husband, the court noted a considerable income inconsistency with his declared earnings. The judgment referenced several Supreme Court rulings emphasizing the underlying purpose of Section 125 Cr.P.C.—to provide swift and necessary relief to prevent destitution among wives and children.

Income Review: The Court estimated the husband’s annual income at approximately Rs. 7,50,000 based on the profits and overall financial health of his company.

Maintenance Justification: Drawing on legal precedents, the Court highlighted that the capacity to earn is distinct from actual earnings and that maintenance should reflect realistic and current financial capabilities.

Educational Expenses: Special consideration was given to the daughter’s educational expenses, reinforcing the need for adequate support to ensure her continued education without disruption.

Concluding its findings, the High Court significantly increased the maintenance payments. The wife’s maintenance was set at Rs. 18,500 per month, and the daughter’s at Rs. 10,000 per month, effective from the date of the original maintenance application. The revised total monthly maintenance amount was ordered at Rs. 28,500. The judgment also specified a schedule for arrears and regular monthly payments, ensuring timely financial support.

 Date of Decision: April 10, 2024

Smt. Aparna Kushwaha And Another vs. State of U.P. and Another

 

Similar News