Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Proceedings Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Are of a Summary Nature and Intended to Enable Destitute Wives and Children to Get Maintenance in a Speedy Manner – Allahabad High Court Enhances Maintenance in Light of Husband’s Income

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

In a significant judgment today, the Allahabad High Court addressed issues surrounding maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), focusing on preventing vagrancy and ensuring financial support for wives and children who are unable to maintain themselves.

The revision petition arose from a dispute over maintenance initially awarded by the Family Court, Kanpur, which granted Rs. 5,000 per month to the wife and Rs. 3,000 per month to the daughter. The revisionists challenged the adequacy of the maintenance, citing the husband’s substantial income from his pharmaceutical business and other assets, including agricultural land.

The High Court meticulously reviewed the husband’s financial status, scrutinizing company revenues, profit shares, and his significant role as a director and major shareholder. Contrary to the claims of financial incapacity by the husband, the court noted a considerable income inconsistency with his declared earnings. The judgment referenced several Supreme Court rulings emphasizing the underlying purpose of Section 125 Cr.P.C.—to provide swift and necessary relief to prevent destitution among wives and children.

Income Review: The Court estimated the husband’s annual income at approximately Rs. 7,50,000 based on the profits and overall financial health of his company.

Maintenance Justification: Drawing on legal precedents, the Court highlighted that the capacity to earn is distinct from actual earnings and that maintenance should reflect realistic and current financial capabilities.

Educational Expenses: Special consideration was given to the daughter’s educational expenses, reinforcing the need for adequate support to ensure her continued education without disruption.

Concluding its findings, the High Court significantly increased the maintenance payments. The wife’s maintenance was set at Rs. 18,500 per month, and the daughter’s at Rs. 10,000 per month, effective from the date of the original maintenance application. The revised total monthly maintenance amount was ordered at Rs. 28,500. The judgment also specified a schedule for arrears and regular monthly payments, ensuring timely financial support.

 Date of Decision: April 10, 2024

Smt. Aparna Kushwaha And Another vs. State of U.P. and Another

 

Latest Legal News