Supreme Court Holds Allottees Who Elected RERA Remedy Cannot Subsequently Seek Interim Relief Under Section 9 Arbitration Act Lodging FIR Does Not Amount To Instigation: Supreme Court Quashes Section 306 IPC Case Against In-Laws Over Husband's Suicide Vigilant Citizen Deserves Acknowledgment: Supreme Court Sets Strict Timelines For 20-Year-Old Subway Project, Lauds Litigant's Relentless Legal Battle Lawyer Cannot Disclose Privileged Information On TV Even If Client Becomes Adversary: Supreme Court Upholds Suspension Of Advocate Rizwan Siddique, Slaps ₹5 Lakh Cost On Both Parties Supreme Court Modifies 3-Year Bar Practice Rule; Orders 1-Year Practice Coupled With 2-Year Academy Training & Clerkship Model Made A Scapegoat Under Pressure Of Public Outcry: Delhi High Court Acquits Man Sentenced To Life In POCSO Case Doctrine Of Lis Pendens Applies To Court Auctions; Purchaser Bound By Outcome Of Pending Specific Performance Suit: Allahabad High Court Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Section 65B Evidence Act Objection Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal Two-Month Time Limit To File Evidence Under Rule 45 Of Trade Marks Rules 2017 Is Mandatory; Non-Compliance Results In Deemed Abandonment: Madras High Court SEBI Act | Special Law Overrides General Law': Bombay High Court Quashes Police FIR Against Ex-Axis Mutual Fund Chief Dealer In Front-Running Case 'Truth Cannot Be Sacrificed At The Altar Of Rigid Timelines': Calcutta High Court Upholds Section 311 CrPC Powers At Any Stage For Just Decision 'A Dispute Does Not Cease To Be Criminal Merely Because It Involves Commercial Transaction': Chhattisgarh High Court Refuses To Quash Cheating FIR In ₹4.39 Cr Land Deal Holding In Designated Centres Only Way If Foreigner Cannot Be Expelled: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail To Declared Foreigner Who Illegally Re-Entered India Madras High Court Issues Guidelines Against Police Harassment Under Guise Of Enquiry, Mandates Written Summons Under Section 179 BNSS Grave Ramifications On Rights': Punjab & Haryana High Court Mandates Strict Compliance Of Section 82 CrPC Before Declaring Accused As Proclaimed Person 'Interacting With Father Benefits Child's Well-Being': Kerala High Court Grants Virtual Access To Father After Mother Takes Child Abroad Violating Restraint Order Agreement In Family Member’s Name Cannot Shield Occupants Under Section 53-A TP Act': Uttarakhand High Court Upholds Eviction Of Licensees Not Filling A Lacuna: Subsequent Forensic Report From Criminal Case Can Be Produced As Additional Evidence In Civil Suit: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Nomination In FIR Not Enough For Vicarious Liability: Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused Under Section 149 IPC Demanding Separations From Depending In-Laws Constitute Mental Cruelty: Calcutta High Court Upholds Divorce Human Memory Not Photographic: Allahabad High Court Upholds Murder Conviction, Reiterates 'Falsus In Uno' Maxim Has No Application In India Litigant Claiming To Be Sub-Tenant Before Revenue Authorities Cannot Set Up Plea Of Adverse Possession In Civil Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Civil Death": Orissa High Court Rules Blacklisting Of Contractor Without Specific Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice Delay Irrespective Of Number Of Years Ought To Be Condoned In Land Acquisition Matters': Punjab & Haryana High Court Condones 3953 Days Delay 'Notary Cannot Act As Marriage Officer': Madhya Pradesh High Court Accepts Notary's Apology With ₹2 Lakh Welfare Cost, Directs Display Board Against Notarizing Marriages

Procedure for Availing Free Medical Treatment Must Be Streamlined – Delhi High Court Directs Implementation of Systematic Reforms

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling aimed at improving access to medical treatments for the economically weaker sections, the Delhi High Court has ordered the Chief Secretary of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) to ensure the implementation of a committee’s recommendations designed to streamline the process of availing financial assistance for medical treatments.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The judgment revolves around the crucial issue of providing adequate medical facilities to the underprivileged by easing the process through which financial assistance is availed, ensuring a robust mechanism for quick and efficient medical treatment.

Facts and Issues of the Case: The case originated from a writ petition filed by the petitioner, Sarvesh, seeking directions for the respondents, including All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) and others, to perform hip and knee replacement surgery free of cost. Throughout the litigation, broader systemic issues concerning the facilitation of medical assistance were brought to the forefront.

Streamlining Processes: The Court highlighted the need for a “single-window mechanism” with designated nodal officers at each hospital to manage applications for financial assistance, emphasizing the reduction of bureaucratic hurdles that patients face.

Dynamic Information Systems: Hospitals are required to maintain a dynamic list of available drugs, implants, and devices on their websites, updated in real time to aid in transparency and ease of access.

Financial Structures: The establishment of revolving funds at multiple administrative levels to manage the recurring expenses of patients with chronic and serious diseases was underscored as a priority.

Minimization of Patient Burdens: The judgment calls for minimizing the involvement of patients or their families in the bureaucratic aspects of the application process for financial aid, such as obtaining quotations or multiple appearances, which can be detrimental both financially and emotionally.

Implementation of Electronic Systems: The Court recommended the development of specific software solutions to further reduce the need for physical appearances and streamline the processing of applications.

Decision: Concluding the proceedings, the Court accepted the committee’s recommendations and ordered their implementation under the oversight of the GNCTD’s Chief Secretary, who is also directed to convene monthly meetings to ensure swift execution of these reforms. An action taken report has been mandated by 15th October 2024, with the matter set for compliance review on 22nd October 2024.

Date of Decision: May 10, 2024

Sarvesh vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences & Ors.

Latest Legal News