Limitation For Executing Partition Decree Not Suspended Till Engrossment; Right To Seek Engrossment Subsists During 12-Year Execution Period: Allahabad HC Unilateral Revocation Of Registered Gift Deed Through Sub-Registrar Is Void, Donor Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mediation Cannot Be Forced Upon Unwilling Party In Civil Suits; Consent Of Both Sides Essential: Bombay High Court Unmarried Daughter Not Entitled To Freedom Fighter Pension If Gainfully Employed At Time Of Father's Death: Calcutta High Court Section 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Denied For Lack Of Formal Divorce From First Marriage: Delhi High Court ONGC Cannot Demand Security From Award Holder After Giving ‘No Objection’ To Withdrawal Of Deposited Amount: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sedative Drugs Like Tramadol Impact Mental Fitness Of Declarant; Bombay High Court Acquits Man Relying On Doubtful Dying Declarations Postal Tracking Report Showing 'Refusal' Not Conclusive Proof Of Service If Denied On Oath: Delhi High Court Encroachments Near Military Installations Pose National Security Threat; Remove Illegal Constructions Within Three Months: Rajasthan High Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs State To Decide On Legality Of Charging Fees For Downloading FIRs From 'SAANJH' Portal Wife’s Educational Qualifications No Bar To Seeking Maintenance If Actual Employment Is Not Proven: Orissa High Court Mere Telephonic Contact Without Substance Of Conversation Cannot Establish Criminal Conspiracy: Madhya Pradesh High Court Serious Allegations Like HIV/AIDS Imputations Require Corroboration, Cannot Rest Solely On Unsubstantiated Testimony: Karnataka High Court Family Court Cannot Refuse Mutual Consent Divorce Merely Because Parties Are Living Separately 'Without Valid Reason': Kerala High Court Collective Attempts By Advocates To Overbear Presiding Officer Not Protected Professional Conduct: Madras High Court Dismisses Quash Petitions No Legal Evidence Required To Forward A Person To Trial? Rajasthan HC Slams Police For Implicating Accused In NDPS Case Solely On Co-Accused's Statement Accused Must Be Physically Present In Court To Furnish Bonds Under Section 91 BNSS: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Procedure for Availing Free Medical Treatment Must Be Streamlined – Delhi High Court Directs Implementation of Systematic Reforms

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling aimed at improving access to medical treatments for the economically weaker sections, the Delhi High Court has ordered the Chief Secretary of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) to ensure the implementation of a committee’s recommendations designed to streamline the process of availing financial assistance for medical treatments.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The judgment revolves around the crucial issue of providing adequate medical facilities to the underprivileged by easing the process through which financial assistance is availed, ensuring a robust mechanism for quick and efficient medical treatment.

Facts and Issues of the Case: The case originated from a writ petition filed by the petitioner, Sarvesh, seeking directions for the respondents, including All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) and others, to perform hip and knee replacement surgery free of cost. Throughout the litigation, broader systemic issues concerning the facilitation of medical assistance were brought to the forefront.

Streamlining Processes: The Court highlighted the need for a “single-window mechanism” with designated nodal officers at each hospital to manage applications for financial assistance, emphasizing the reduction of bureaucratic hurdles that patients face.

Dynamic Information Systems: Hospitals are required to maintain a dynamic list of available drugs, implants, and devices on their websites, updated in real time to aid in transparency and ease of access.

Financial Structures: The establishment of revolving funds at multiple administrative levels to manage the recurring expenses of patients with chronic and serious diseases was underscored as a priority.

Minimization of Patient Burdens: The judgment calls for minimizing the involvement of patients or their families in the bureaucratic aspects of the application process for financial aid, such as obtaining quotations or multiple appearances, which can be detrimental both financially and emotionally.

Implementation of Electronic Systems: The Court recommended the development of specific software solutions to further reduce the need for physical appearances and streamline the processing of applications.

Decision: Concluding the proceedings, the Court accepted the committee’s recommendations and ordered their implementation under the oversight of the GNCTD’s Chief Secretary, who is also directed to convene monthly meetings to ensure swift execution of these reforms. An action taken report has been mandated by 15th October 2024, with the matter set for compliance review on 22nd October 2024.

Date of Decision: May 10, 2024

Sarvesh vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences & Ors.

Latest Legal News