Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Delays in processing applications for premature release cannot deprive convicts of interim relief: Karnataka High Court Grants 90-Day Parole Listing All Appeals Arising From A Common Judgment Before The Same Bench Avoids Contradictory Rulings: Full Bench of the Patna High Court. Age Claims in Borderline Cases Demand Scrutiny: Madhya Pradesh HC on Juvenile Justice Act Bishop Garden Not Available for Partition Due to Legal Quietus on Declaration Suit: Madras High Court Exclusion of Certain Heirs Alone Does Not Make a Will Suspicious: Kerala High Court Upholds Validity of Will Proof of Delivery Was Never Requested, Nor Was it a Payment Precondition: Delhi High Court Held Courier Firm Entitled to Payment Despite Non-Delivery Allegations Widowed Daughter Eligible for Compassionate Appointment under BSNL Scheme: Allahabad High Court Brutality of an Offence Does Not Dispense With Legal Proof: Supreme Court Overturns Life Imprisonment of Two Accused Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son

Priority to Secured Creditors Must Prevail: Karnataka High Court Orders Registration of Sale Certificate Under SARFAESI Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Karnataka has mandated the Sub-Registrar of J.P. Nagar to register a sale certificate issued under the SARFAESI Act, overriding objections based on pending Income Tax dues against the original property owners. The judgment, delivered by Justice M. Nagaprasanna, emphasizes that the rights of secured creditors under the SARFAESI Act take precedence over other statutory claims, including tax dues.

The petitioner, Sri T. Bharathgowda, emerged as the successful bidder in a public auction conducted by Canara Bank, acquiring a property previously owned by borrowers who had defaulted on their loan. The sale certificate was issued on 30th September 2022. Despite fulfilling all necessary registration requirements, the petitioner faced refusal from the Sub-Registrar of J.P. Nagar, citing pending Income Tax dues against the original owners.

Priority of Secured Creditors: Justice Nagaprasanna underscored the statutory priority of secured creditors, referring to Sections 26E and 35 of the SARFAESI Act. “The provisions of the SARFAESI Act will have effect, notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law,” the court noted, emphasizing the Act’s overriding nature. The judgment reiterated that the debts due to secured creditors shall be paid in priority over all other debts, including taxes.

Refusal of Registration by Sub-Registrar: The court scrutinized the reasons behind the Sub-Registrar’s refusal to register the sale certificate, citing non-compliance with the reasons enumerated under Section 71 of the Registration Act and Rule 171 of the Karnataka Registration Rules. “The refusal to register a document based on reasons not listed in Rule 171 is invalid,” the court stated, highlighting that statutory dues pending against borrowers are not valid grounds for such refusal.

Justice Nagaprasanna referenced several Supreme Court judgments to support the decision, notably Punjab National Bank v. Union of India and Central Bank of India v. Siriguppa Sugars & Chemicals Ltd. These cases affirm the precedence of secured creditors’ rights over statutory dues, such as those under the Central Excise Act and Income Tax Act. The judgment quoted from Punjab National Bank v. Union of India: “The dues of the secured creditor, the Bank or any other financial institution, will have priority over the dues of the Central Excise Department under the Central Excise Act.”

Justice Nagaprasanna remarked, “The provisions of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, even after insertion of Section 11-E in the Central Excise Act, 1944 w.e.f. 8-4-2011, will have an overriding effect on the provisions of the Central Excise Act.” This observation highlights the consistent judicial stance on the precedence of secured creditors’ rights.

Conclusion: The High Court’s decision mandates immediate registration of the sale certificate by the Sub-Registrar and directs the State Government to issue a circular clarifying the registration obligations under the SARFAESI Act. This judgment reinforces the legal framework prioritizing secured creditors, setting a precedent for future cases involving similar disputes. The court’s directive for a clarificatory circular aims to prevent unnecessary litigation and ensure compliance with statutory provisions, thereby streamlining the registration process for secured transactions.

Date of Decision: 28th May 2024

Sri T. Bharathgowda v. State of Karnataka

Similar News