Summary Security Force Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Civil Offences Beyond Simple Hurt And Theft: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Vague Allegations Cannot Dissolve a Sacred Marital Relationship: Karnataka High Court Upholds Dismissal of Divorce Petition Daughters Entitled to Coparcenary Rights in Ancestral Property under Hindu Succession Act, 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Divorce | False Allegations of Domestic Violence and Paternity Questions Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Hostile Witness Testimony Admissible if Corroborated by Independent Evidence: Punjab and Haryana High Court Fraud Must Be Specifically Pleaded and Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt to Invalidate Registered Documents: Andhra Pradesh High Court Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Rash Driving Conviction But Grants Probation to First-Time Offender Bus Driver Orissa High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband Convicted of Wife's Murder Merit Cannot Be Sacrificed for Procedural Technicalities in NEET UG Admissions: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Upholds Partition Decrees: Unregistered Partition Deed Inadmissible, Fails to Prove Prior Partition - Joint Hindu Family Property Presumed Undivided: Patna High Court Section 195(1)(b) CrPC | Judicial Integrity Cannot Be Undermined: Supreme Court Restores Evidence Tampering Case In a NDPS Case Readiness and Willingness, Not Time, Decide Equity in Sale Agreements: Supreme Court Denies Specific Performance Prolonged Detention Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 21: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Money Laundering Case DV ACT | Economic Abuse Includes Alienation of Assets, Necessitating Protection Orders: Allahabad High Court Illegal Structures to Face Demolition: Bombay HC Directs Strict Action Against Unauthorized Constructions Justice Must Extend to the Last Person Behind Bars: Supreme Court Pushes for Full Implementation of BNSS Section 479 to Relieve Undertrial Prisoners Efficiency Over Central Oversight: Supreme Court Asserts Need for Localized SIT in Chennai Case Partition, Not Injunction, Is Remedy for Joint Property Disputes: P&H High Court Dismisses Plea Subsequent Purchaser Can Question Plaintiff’s Intent: MP High Court Clarifies Specific Relief Act Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act

Ignoring Crucial Evidence is an Illegal Approach: P&H High Court in Remanding Ancestral Property Dispute for Fresh Appraisal

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Additional evidence to determine the ancestral nature of disputed lands in Salala and Pattar Kalan villages.

In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court remanded an ancestral property dispute back to the lower appellate court, emphasizing the necessity of considering additional evidence. The case, involving the descendants of Dalip Singh and his land in Salala and Pattar Kalan, highlights the complexities of property inheritance and the importance of thorough judicial review.

The dispute traces its origins to a suit filed by Gurdev Singh and Sarwan Singh, sons of Dalip Singh, in 1985. They contested the ancestral nature of land in the villages of Salala and Pattar Kalan, which Dalip Singh allegedly favored his grandsons, the sons of his other sons, Lachhman Singh and Baldev Singh. The plaintiffs sought to invalidate a 1982 decree in favor of these grandsons, claiming their joint ownership of the property.

The central issue was whether the land was ancestral or self-acquired. Dalip Singh’s descendants were divided, with some arguing that the land was ancestral, inherited from his father Hakam Singh, while others maintained it was self-acquired. The trial court had previously ruled that the land in Pattar Kalan was ancestral, whereas the land in Salala was self-acquired based on a 1958 sale deed from Parmeshwari Devi to Dalip Singh.

Justice Deepak Gupta noted significant omissions by the lower courts, particularly the failure to address an application for additional evidence filed by the plaintiffs in 1987. This application aimed to introduce further documentation, including a claim application and allotment parchi, to clarify the nature of the land. The appellate court's oversight in not considering this application was deemed a critical flaw in the judicial process.

The judgment underscored the appellate court's duty to evaluate all pertinent evidence before reaching a decision. "The application for additional evidence, filed under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC, was essential for a comprehensive understanding of the case. Ignoring this application constituted a lapse that necessitates a re-evaluation," the court stated.

Justice Deepak Gupta remarked, "Without deciding the application for additional evidence, the appeal's merits cannot be thoroughly assessed. The appellate court must consider this evidence to ensure a just resolution."

The remanding of this case highlights the judiciary's commitment to exhaustive evidence evaluation in property disputes. By directing the lower appellate court to reassess the case with the additional evidence, the High Court aims to ensure a fair determination of the land's ancestral status. This judgment is expected to reinforce the importance of meticulous evidence review in similar property disputes.

Case Title: Gurdev Singh (since deceased) through LRs and another vs. Lachhman Singh and others

 

 Date of Decision: May 31, 2024

Similar News