Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Pre-Planned Manner with a Pre-Determined Mind": Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Witchcraft-Related Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement, the Supreme Court has upheld the life sentence for the two remaining accused, Bhaktu Gorain (A-1) and Bandhu Gorain (A-3), in the infamous witchcraft-related murder case that originated from West Bengal. The court dismissed the appeal arguing against "common intention" to commit the crime, affirming the judgement of the High Court.

Justice Pankaj Mithal observed, "The very fact that they had assembled in the morning and surrounded (gheraoed) the deceased with deadly weapons is sufficient indication to infer that they had surrounded (gheraoed) in a pre-planned manner with a pre-determined mind."

Background

The case dates back to 1993, when a group of five accused had been convicted of murdering Smt. Keshari Mahato after accusing her of witchcraft. The High Court had earlier confirmed the life sentences for all the accused. However, appeals for three were dismissed in 2011, leaving Bhaktu Gorain and Bandhu Gorain as the remaining appellants in the case.

Witnesses and Evidence

The judgement emphasized that eye witnesses, including the family members of the deceased, were credible and consistent in their testimony. The court noted, "It may be pertinent to mention here that all the aforesaid witnesses successfully stood the test of cross-examination and nothing could be extracted from them in cross-examination that could discredit their testimony."

Medical Report

Further substantiating the case, the post-mortem report indicated that the injuries sustained by the deceased were consistent with the weapons described by the witnesses. Dr. A.K. Hazari, who conducted the post-mortem, was quoted in the judgement, describing the injuries as severe enough to cause immediate death.

Rejected Argument

The defense’s submission arguing that there was no common intention to commit the murder was flatly rejected by the court. "The submission is devoid of any merit as admittedly an altercation had taken place between the parties on the previous night in which all the five accused persons were present, and it is in furtherance of the said quarrel that all of them had appeared in the morning with reinforced vengeance," stated Justice Mithal.

Date of Decision: SEPTEMBER 12, 2023

BHAKTU GORAIN & ANR.  vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL    

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/12-Sep-2023_Bhaktu_Vs_State_WB.pdf"]

Latest Legal News