High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Denies Tax Refund for Hybrid Vehicle Purchased Before Electric Vehicle Exemption Policy Entering A Room with Someone Cannot, By Any Stretch Of Imagination, Be Considered Consent For Sexual Intercourse: Bombay High Court No Specific Format Needed for Dying Declaration, Focus on Mental State and Voluntariness: Calcutta High Court Delhi High Court Allows Direct Appeal Under DVAT Act Without Tribunal Reference for Pre-2005 Tax Periods NDPS | Mere Registration of Cases Does Not Override Presumption of Innocence: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Previous Antecedents and No Communal Tension: High Court Grants Bail in Caste-Based Abuse Case Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Loss of Confidence Must Be Objectively Proven to Deny Reinstatement: Kerala High Court Reinstates Workman After Flawed Domestic Enquiry Procedural lapses should not deny justice: Andhra High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Canteen Subsidy Constitutes Part of Dearness Allowance Under EPF Act: Gujarat High Court Concurrent Findings Demonstrate Credibility – Jharkhand High Court Affirms Conviction in Cheating Case 125 Cr.P.C | Financial responsibility towards dependents cannot be shirked due to personal obligations: Punjab and Haryana High Court Mere Acceptance of Money Without Proof of Demand is Not Sufficient to Establish Corruption Charges Gujrat High Court Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case

Politically Motivated Allegations Don't Hold Up in Court: Allahabad High Court Quashed Proceedings Under SCST Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Allahabad High Court has quashed the criminal proceedings against Amit Kumar Singh in a case involving alleged caste-based abuses and threats. The court found the allegations to be politically motivated and lacking sufficient evidence. This decision underscores the necessity of thorough judicial scrutiny and the importance of credible evidence in cases involving serious charges under the SC/ST Act.

Background:

Amit Kumar Singh, a student of Hotel Management in Sydney, Australia, was accused by Gola of caste-based abuses, threats, and assault. The allegations were said to be driven by a political rivalry involving the village Pradhan, Shiv Shanker Singh. The complainant, Gola, claimed that Amit Kumar Singh and his associates had physically assaulted him and issued threats. However, a police inquiry and previous judicial orders revealed contradictions and a lack of credible evidence, suggesting that the allegations were fabricated.

Court Observations:

Lack of Credible Evidence: The court's analysis found significant inconsistencies in the complainant's statements and the evidence presented. A police report concluded that the complaint was motivated by political rivalry and not based on factual events. "The proceedings are based on fabricated facts and political motivations," the court noted, referencing the police findings that discredited the complainant's claims.

Contradictory Statements and Judicial Application of Mind: The court criticized the judicial process for failing to apply proper scrutiny before issuing the summoning order. "The learned Magistrate did not consider the material available before him and relied solely on the contents of the complaint," observed the court. The summoning order was found to lack detailed reasoning and did not adequately scrutinize the evidence.

Legal Reasoning: The judgment emphasized the principles set by the Supreme Court for evaluating evidence in cases under the SC/ST Act. The court reiterated that for an offence under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act to be valid, the incident must occur in a place within public view, and there must be an evident intention to humiliate based on caste. "In the present case, the incident took place inside the complainant's house without public view, thus not fulfilling the requirements for offences under the SC/ST Act," the court stated.

Justice Shamim Ahmed remarked, "The allegations were found to be politically motivated and driven by personal rivalry. The judicial mind was not adequately applied by the Magistrate in the summoning order, which is a serious matter."

Decision: The Allahabad High Court's decision to quash the criminal proceedings against Amit Kumar Singh reinforces the judiciary's commitment to preventing the misuse of legal provisions, particularly those under the SC/ST Act. This judgment highlights the necessity for thorough evidence evaluation and proper judicial application of mind when taking cognizance of criminal cases. The ruling is expected to set a precedent for future cases, ensuring that allegations driven by ulterior motives are adequately scrutinized to uphold justice.

Date of Decision: May 29, 2024

Amit Kumar Singh vs. Gola and Another

Similar News