Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

P&H High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Alleged Cyber-Criminal in Police Sub Inspectors’ Exam Scam

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has dismissed the anticipatory bail plea of Mr. Gurmeet Singh, who was allegedly involved in a massive examination scam related to the recruitment of Police Sub Inspectors in the State of Punjab. The judgment was pronounced on July 21, 2023, by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara.

The accused, Mr. Gurmeet Singh, was apprehended on charges of facilitating the online examination scam by hacking the examination center and remotely solving question papers. The scam involved providing undue advantage to certain candidates in exchange for large sums of money.

The court emphasized the seriousness of the offense and the potential consequences of allowing cyber-criminals involved in such crimes to evade custodial interrogation. It stressed the importance of stringent action against cyber-thugs to safeguard sensitive matters like police recruitments and prevent future breaches.

“The evidence collected so far points out the petitioner’s involvement... Given the nature of allegations, custodial interrogation is required. An analysis of the allegations and evidence collected does not warrant the grant of bail to the petitioner.”

The court’s decision came after examining the evidence presented by the police, which included communication records and transactions linking the petitioner to the offense. The court also considered the ongoing investigation, which aims to uncover the involvement of other individuals in the recruitment scam.

The judgment also highlighted the vulnerability of examination systems and the usage of breach-able and unsafe software, calling for fool-proof and secure software to prevent misuse of artificial intelligence by hackers.

“This scam has not only impaired but also derailed a highly sensitive and essential recruitment in the police... There can be no leniency while dealing with bail petitions of cyber-thugs in the matters of cyber-crime.”

The court’s decision reflects its commitment to maintaining the integrity of the recruitment process and the importance of apprehending cyber-criminals involved in such sensitive matters. The judgment serves as a reminder that cyber-crime needs to be dealt with stringently to prevent further breaches in the future.

The court clarified that its observations in the judgment should not be considered as expressions of opinion on the case’s merits and that the trial court should not refer to these comments.

“Any observation made hereinabove is neither an expression of opinion on the case’s merits, neither the court taking up regular bail nor the trial Court shall advert to these comments.”

The dismissal of the anticipatory bail plea indicates that the accused, Mr. Gurmeet Singh, will now have to face custodial interrogation and further legal proceedings in the case.                                        

Date of Decision: 21.07.2023                                                    

Gurmeet Singh  vs State of Punjab   

Latest Legal News