Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Delays in processing applications for premature release cannot deprive convicts of interim relief: Karnataka High Court Grants 90-Day Parole Listing All Appeals Arising From A Common Judgment Before The Same Bench Avoids Contradictory Rulings: Full Bench of the Patna High Court. Age Claims in Borderline Cases Demand Scrutiny: Madhya Pradesh HC on Juvenile Justice Act Bishop Garden Not Available for Partition Due to Legal Quietus on Declaration Suit: Madras High Court Exclusion of Certain Heirs Alone Does Not Make a Will Suspicious: Kerala High Court Upholds Validity of Will Proof of Delivery Was Never Requested, Nor Was it a Payment Precondition: Delhi High Court Held Courier Firm Entitled to Payment Despite Non-Delivery Allegations Widowed Daughter Eligible for Compassionate Appointment under BSNL Scheme: Allahabad High Court Brutality of an Offence Does Not Dispense With Legal Proof: Supreme Court Overturns Life Imprisonment of Two Accused Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son

Petitioner Has Failed to Rebut the Presumption: Punjab and Haryana High Court Affirms Conviction in Cheque Dishonor Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The judgment, delivered by Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, upheld the findings of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class and the Additional Sessions Judge, reaffirming the petitioner’s guilt for dishonoring a cheque issued as part of a settlement agreement.

The case originated from a complaint filed by respondent Jolly against the petitioner, Pushpa Bahmni, the sole proprietor of M/s H.P. Bahmni Filling Station. Bahmni had entered into an agreement to sell her petrol pump to Jolly and issued a cheque for Rs. 40,00,000 as part of a settlement agreement after the sale was impeded by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Terminating the retail outlet agreement. The cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds, leading to legal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Credibility of Evidence: Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi emphasized the reliability of the documentary evidence presented by the respondent, which included the agreement to sell and the settlement deed. “The petitioner’s multiple contradictory defenses and failure to rebut the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were crucial factors in upholding the conviction,” Justice Bedi noted.

Petitioner’s Defenses: The court found the petitioner’s defenses to be inconsistent and unreliable. Bahmni claimed that the cheque was lost or misused, yet failed to provide substantive evidence to support this claim. Additionally, the court noted that despite Bahmni’s assertion of having reported the missing cheque book to the police and the bank, no legal action was taken against the alleged misuse.

Witness Testimonies: The testimonies from witnesses corroborated the existence and execution of the agreement and settlement deed. Witnesses such as Satish Kumar, who attested the documents, confirmed the petitioner’s involvement and signature on the crucial documents. This further discredited the petitioner’s claims of forgery and misuse.

Justice Bedi reiterated the legal principles surrounding the presumption of liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act. “Once the signatures on the cheque are admitted, the presumption under Section 118 and 139 arises, and the onus shifts to the drawer to rebut the presumption,” the judgment stated. The petitioner’s failure to provide a credible defense or substantive evidence to counter the presumption led to the upholding of the conviction.

Justice Bedi remarked, “The petitioner has failed to rebut the presumption as exists in favor of the respondent as per Section 118 read with Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.” The court emphasized that the consistent and corroborative evidence presented by the respondent outweighed the petitioner’s contradictory defenses.

The High Court’s decision to dismiss the revision petition reinforces the judiciary’s stance on upholding the integrity of financial transactions and the legal presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The judgment sends a strong message about the consequences of issuing dishonored cheques and the importance of maintaining credibility in legal defenses. This ruling is expected to have significant implications for future cases involving dishonored cheques, reinforcing the legal framework that ensures accountability in commercial transactions.

Date of Decision:May 31, 2024

Pushpa Bahmni v. Jolly and anr.

Similar News