Court Must Conduct Inquiry on Mental Competency Before Appointing Legal Guardian - Punjab and Haryana High Court Right to Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to the Sentiments of Society: Kerala High Court Grants Bail in Eve Teasing Case Supreme Court Extends Probation to 70-Year-Old in Decades-Old Family Feud Case Authorized Railway Agents Cannot Be Criminally Prosecuted for Unauthorized Procurement And Supply Of Railway Tickets: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Arbitrarily: Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Accused For Valid Arbitration Agreement and Party Consent Necessary: Supreme Court Declares Ex-Parte Arbitration Awards Null and Void NDPS | Lack of Homogeneous Mixing, Inventory Preparation, and Magistrate Certification Fatal to Prosecution's Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court "May Means May, and Shall Means Shall": Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court's Discretion Under Section 148 of NI Act Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Re-Evaluation of Coal Block Tender, Cites Concerns Over Arbitrary Disqualification Dying Declarations Must Be Beyond Doubt to Sustain Convictions: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Burn Injury Murder Case No Legally Enforceable Debt Proven: Madras High Court Dismisses Petition for Special Leave to Appeal in Cheque Bounce Case Decisional Autonomy is a Core Part of the Right to Privacy : Kerala High Court Upholds LGBTQ+ Rights in Landmark Habeas Corpus Case Consent of a Minor Is No Defense Under the POCSO Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Well-Known Marks Demand Special Protection: Delhi HC Cancels Conflicting Trademark for RPG Industrial Products High Court Acquits Accused Due to ‘Golden Thread’ Principle: Gaps in Medical Evidence and Unexplained Time Frame Prove Decisive Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown; Awards ₹12 Crore Permanent Alimony Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Maintenance Must Reflect Financial Realities and Social Standards: Madhya Pradesh High Court Upholds Interim Maintenance in Domestic Violence Land Classified as Agricultural Not Automatically Exempt from SARFAESI Proceedings: High Court Permissive Use Cannot Ripen into Right of Prescriptive Easement: Kerala High Court High Court Slams Procedural Delays, Orders FSL Report in Assault Case to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice Petitioner Did Not Endorse Part-Payments on Cheque; Section 138 NI Act Not Attracted: Madras High Court Minority Christian Schools Not Bound by Rules of 2018; Disciplinary Proceedings Can Continue: High Court of Calcutta Lack of Independent Witnesses Undermines Prosecution: Madras High Court Reaffirms Acquittal in SCST Case Proceedings Before Tribunal Are Summary in Nature and It Need Not Be Conducted Like Civil Suits: Kerala High Court Affirms Award in Accident Claim Affidavit Not Sufficient to Transfer Title Punjab and Haryana High Court

Orders Sanctioning Schemes of Amalgamation are 'Instruments' of 'Conveyance', Rules Madras High Court; Strikes Down Part of G.O. on Stamp Duty Computation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Madras High Court in a landmark judgment upheld the classification of court orders sanctioning schemes of amalgamation as 'instruments' of 'conveyance' under the Indian Stamp Act, making them liable for stamp duty. The Court also partially quashed G.O.(Ms.) No.29 dated 01.03.2019, specifically its mode of computing stamp duty based on the aggregate market value of shares.

Brief on Legal Point: The judgment decisively interpreted the scope of 'instruments' and 'conveyances' under the Indian Stamp Act as inclusive of orders sanctioning schemes of amalgamation. It further clarified the State's authority in retrospectively applying stamp duty rates and delineated the permissible methods for computing such duty.

The petitions challenged the validity of the circular and Government Orders regarding stamp duty on court-sanctioned amalgamation orders. The primary issue was whether these orders could be treated as conveyances for stamp duty purposes and the legality of the retrospective applicability and method of computation of the stamp duty.

Instrument and Conveyance Classification: The Court affirmed that court orders sanctioning amalgamation schemes are 'instruments' and 'conveyances', thus subject to stamp duty.

Retrospective Application Validity: The Court upheld the retrospective application of reduced stamp duty rates as per G.O.(Ms.) No.47 dated 19.02.2020, asserting this within the State's legal powers.

Computation Method: The Court invalidated the part of G.O.(Ms.) No.29 that prescribed stamp duty computation based on 0.6% of the aggregate market value of shares, requiring legislative action for such a method.

Consideration of Stamp Duty Paid in Other States: The Court ruled that stamp duty paid in other states should be accounted for in Tamil Nadu's stamp duty calculation for the same instrument.

The Court maintained the circular on stamp duty for amalgamation orders and the retrospective application of reduced rates. However, it struck down the specific computation method based on the aggregate market value of shares in G.O.(Ms.) No.29.

Date of Decision: 19.02.2024

State of Tamil  VS M/s Serene Estate Private Limited        

Similar News