Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

Non-Cooperation with ED and Strong Evidence of Money Laundering: High Court of Delhi Dismisses AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan's Bail Application

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a significant decision, has dismissed the pre-arrest bail application of Aam Aadmi Party MLA Amanatullah Khan in connection with a money laundering case related to alleged financial irregularities in the Delhi Waqf Board. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, while denying the relief, underscored the MLA's non-cooperation with the Directorate of Enforcement's (ED) investigation.

The Court observed that the material presented was sufficient to invoke the bar under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), indicating prima facie commission of money laundering.

The prosecution alleged that Khan, through corrupt practices, acquired proceeds of crime and laundered money by purchasing properties via associates. Detailed evidence, including diaries of cash transactions, falsified agreements, and bank analyses, pointed towards money laundering activities.

Critical Evidences: The court considered evidence like diaries detailing cash transactions and bank account analyses, affirming the money laundering charges.

Non-Cooperation: Khan's repeated non-compliance with ED's summons was highlighted as a deliberate obstruction of the investigation.

Public Figures' Accountability: The judgment emphasized the role of public figures in upholding law and justice, noting Khan's failure to set a positive precedent.

Balance of Rights and Duties: The court balanced the accused's rights against the duty of the investigating agency, deeming non-cooperation in economic offense cases as influential in bail decisions.

The application for pre-arrest bail was dismissed, with the court underscoring the strong evidence of money laundering and the applicant’s non-cooperation in the investigation. However, the observations were clarified to be solely for bail decision purposes, not commenting on the trial's merits.

Date of Decision: March 11, 2024

Amanatullah Khan Versus Directorate of Enforcement

Latest Legal News