Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Non-Cooperation with ED and Strong Evidence of Money Laundering: High Court of Delhi Dismisses AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan's Bail Application

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a significant decision, has dismissed the pre-arrest bail application of Aam Aadmi Party MLA Amanatullah Khan in connection with a money laundering case related to alleged financial irregularities in the Delhi Waqf Board. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, while denying the relief, underscored the MLA's non-cooperation with the Directorate of Enforcement's (ED) investigation.

The Court observed that the material presented was sufficient to invoke the bar under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), indicating prima facie commission of money laundering.

The prosecution alleged that Khan, through corrupt practices, acquired proceeds of crime and laundered money by purchasing properties via associates. Detailed evidence, including diaries of cash transactions, falsified agreements, and bank analyses, pointed towards money laundering activities.

Critical Evidences: The court considered evidence like diaries detailing cash transactions and bank account analyses, affirming the money laundering charges.

Non-Cooperation: Khan's repeated non-compliance with ED's summons was highlighted as a deliberate obstruction of the investigation.

Public Figures' Accountability: The judgment emphasized the role of public figures in upholding law and justice, noting Khan's failure to set a positive precedent.

Balance of Rights and Duties: The court balanced the accused's rights against the duty of the investigating agency, deeming non-cooperation in economic offense cases as influential in bail decisions.

The application for pre-arrest bail was dismissed, with the court underscoring the strong evidence of money laundering and the applicant’s non-cooperation in the investigation. However, the observations were clarified to be solely for bail decision purposes, not commenting on the trial's merits.

Date of Decision: March 11, 2024

Amanatullah Khan Versus Directorate of Enforcement

Latest Legal News