MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |    

Non-Cooperation with ED and Strong Evidence of Money Laundering: High Court of Delhi Dismisses AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan's Bail Application

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a significant decision, has dismissed the pre-arrest bail application of Aam Aadmi Party MLA Amanatullah Khan in connection with a money laundering case related to alleged financial irregularities in the Delhi Waqf Board. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, while denying the relief, underscored the MLA's non-cooperation with the Directorate of Enforcement's (ED) investigation.

The Court observed that the material presented was sufficient to invoke the bar under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), indicating prima facie commission of money laundering.

The prosecution alleged that Khan, through corrupt practices, acquired proceeds of crime and laundered money by purchasing properties via associates. Detailed evidence, including diaries of cash transactions, falsified agreements, and bank analyses, pointed towards money laundering activities.

Critical Evidences: The court considered evidence like diaries detailing cash transactions and bank account analyses, affirming the money laundering charges.

Non-Cooperation: Khan's repeated non-compliance with ED's summons was highlighted as a deliberate obstruction of the investigation.

Public Figures' Accountability: The judgment emphasized the role of public figures in upholding law and justice, noting Khan's failure to set a positive precedent.

Balance of Rights and Duties: The court balanced the accused's rights against the duty of the investigating agency, deeming non-cooperation in economic offense cases as influential in bail decisions.

The application for pre-arrest bail was dismissed, with the court underscoring the strong evidence of money laundering and the applicant’s non-cooperation in the investigation. However, the observations were clarified to be solely for bail decision purposes, not commenting on the trial's merits.

Date of Decision: March 11, 2024

Amanatullah Khan Versus Directorate of Enforcement

Similar News