Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Non-Cooperation with ED and Strong Evidence of Money Laundering: High Court of Delhi Dismisses AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan's Bail Application

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a significant decision, has dismissed the pre-arrest bail application of Aam Aadmi Party MLA Amanatullah Khan in connection with a money laundering case related to alleged financial irregularities in the Delhi Waqf Board. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, while denying the relief, underscored the MLA's non-cooperation with the Directorate of Enforcement's (ED) investigation.

The Court observed that the material presented was sufficient to invoke the bar under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), indicating prima facie commission of money laundering.

The prosecution alleged that Khan, through corrupt practices, acquired proceeds of crime and laundered money by purchasing properties via associates. Detailed evidence, including diaries of cash transactions, falsified agreements, and bank analyses, pointed towards money laundering activities.

Critical Evidences: The court considered evidence like diaries detailing cash transactions and bank account analyses, affirming the money laundering charges.

Non-Cooperation: Khan's repeated non-compliance with ED's summons was highlighted as a deliberate obstruction of the investigation.

Public Figures' Accountability: The judgment emphasized the role of public figures in upholding law and justice, noting Khan's failure to set a positive precedent.

Balance of Rights and Duties: The court balanced the accused's rights against the duty of the investigating agency, deeming non-cooperation in economic offense cases as influential in bail decisions.

The application for pre-arrest bail was dismissed, with the court underscoring the strong evidence of money laundering and the applicant’s non-cooperation in the investigation. However, the observations were clarified to be solely for bail decision purposes, not commenting on the trial's merits.

Date of Decision: March 11, 2024

Amanatullah Khan Versus Directorate of Enforcement

Latest Legal News