Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

No Need to Call Attesting Witness for Registered Sale Deed Unless Execution Denied: Punjab And Haryana High Court

17 March 2025 10:44 AM

By: Deepak Kumar


On September 18, 2024, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the second appeal in Gurmail Singh v. Raswinder Kaur and another. The appellant sought to nullify two registered sale deeds, alleging fraud and misrepresentation. The court held that the appellant failed to prove the allegations, and no substantial question of law arose in the appeal.

The dispute involved land owned by Pritam Singh, who allegedly executed two sale deeds (Nos. 518 and 519) in favor of defendant No. 1 (Raswinder Kaur). Gurmail Singh, the appellant, claimed that the deeds were fraudulently obtained and that Pritam Singh had intended to sign a lease agreement, not a sale deed. The appellant further asserted that Pritam Singh had bequeathed the land to him via a Will in 2007. The trial court and first appellate court dismissed the suit, upholding the validity of the sale deeds.

The key legal issue revolved around proving allegations of fraud and misrepresentation. The court emphasized that fraud must be proven "beyond doubt," a standard the appellant failed to meet. The court also considered whether the absence of attesting witnesses to the sale deeds invalidated their execution.

The appellant relied on the testimony of PW3 (Santokh Singh), who admitted under cross-examination that he had no personal knowledge of the execution of the sale deeds. This testimony was deemed insufficient to support the fraud claim.

Under Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, registered documents, other than Wills, do not require attesting witnesses unless the execution is specifically denied. Since Pritam Singh, the executant, never contested the sale deeds during his lifetime, the court held that there was no need for attesting witnesses to prove the execution of the sale deeds.

The court upheld the concurrent findings of the lower courts, ruling that the appellant failed to substantiate the claims of fraud. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity of the sale deeds.

Date of Decision: September 18, 2024
 

Latest Legal News