Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

No Need to Call Attesting Witness for Registered Sale Deed Unless Execution Denied: Punjab And Haryana High Court

17 March 2025 10:44 AM

By: Deepak Kumar


On September 18, 2024, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the second appeal in Gurmail Singh v. Raswinder Kaur and another. The appellant sought to nullify two registered sale deeds, alleging fraud and misrepresentation. The court held that the appellant failed to prove the allegations, and no substantial question of law arose in the appeal.

The dispute involved land owned by Pritam Singh, who allegedly executed two sale deeds (Nos. 518 and 519) in favor of defendant No. 1 (Raswinder Kaur). Gurmail Singh, the appellant, claimed that the deeds were fraudulently obtained and that Pritam Singh had intended to sign a lease agreement, not a sale deed. The appellant further asserted that Pritam Singh had bequeathed the land to him via a Will in 2007. The trial court and first appellate court dismissed the suit, upholding the validity of the sale deeds.

The key legal issue revolved around proving allegations of fraud and misrepresentation. The court emphasized that fraud must be proven "beyond doubt," a standard the appellant failed to meet. The court also considered whether the absence of attesting witnesses to the sale deeds invalidated their execution.

The appellant relied on the testimony of PW3 (Santokh Singh), who admitted under cross-examination that he had no personal knowledge of the execution of the sale deeds. This testimony was deemed insufficient to support the fraud claim.

Under Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, registered documents, other than Wills, do not require attesting witnesses unless the execution is specifically denied. Since Pritam Singh, the executant, never contested the sale deeds during his lifetime, the court held that there was no need for attesting witnesses to prove the execution of the sale deeds.

The court upheld the concurrent findings of the lower courts, ruling that the appellant failed to substantiate the claims of fraud. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity of the sale deeds.

Date of Decision: September 18, 2024
 

Latest Legal News