Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     Smell of Alcohol in Post-Mortem Insufficient to Establish Intoxication: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Liability of Insurance Company in Motor Accident Case    |     No Grounds for Transfer: Free Bus Fare for Women in Telangana Reduces Travel Burden: Telangana High Court Rejects Wife's Petition to Transfer Divorce Case    |     Mechanical Referrals Invalid: "Deputy Registrar Must Apply Judicial Mind: Allahabad HC Quashes Deputy Registrar's Order in Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Election Dispute    |    

No Ground for Bail in Commercial Quantity Drug Cases: Delhi High Court Dismisses Bail Application in NDPS Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court, in a significant ruling, has dismissed the bail application of one Guddu Khan, who was apprehended with a commercial quantity of heroin. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar, while delivering the judgment on December 22, 2023, emphasized the seriousness of the offence involving narcotics, especially when the quantity is commercial as per the NDPS Act.

Guddu Khan, accused under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act), was denied regular bail in connection with FIR No. 121/2020. The Court noted that the petitioner was caught red-handed with 300 grams of heroin, a quantity classified as 'commercial' under the law. Justice Bhatnagar, in his decision, stated, "considering the period of incarceration as the petitioner has undergone nearly three years two months which is not even near to half of the minimum sentence of ten years, no ground for bail is made out."

The Court's decision hinges significantly on Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which imposes strict conditions for the grant of bail in cases involving commercial quantities of drugs. The judgment read, "The scheme of Section 37 NDPS Act reveals that the exercise of power to grant bail is not only subject to the limitations contained under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., but is also subject to the limitation placed by Section 37 which commences with non-obstante clause."

In his observations, Justice Bhatnagar remarked, "The expression 'reasonable grounds' means something more than prima facie grounds." He further added that the circumstances of the case and the nature of the offence did not provide reasonable grounds to believe that the accused was not guilty of the alleged offence.

The Court also dismissed the argument regarding the non-consideration of CCTV footage and CDR (Call Detail Records) of the petitioner, citing that the immediate apprehension of the accused with the contraband was a significant factor in the decision.

Date of Decision: 22.12.2023

GUDDU KHAN VS STATE NCT OF DELHI

 

Similar News