Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

No Ground for Bail in Commercial Quantity Drug Cases: Delhi High Court Dismisses Bail Application in NDPS Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court, in a significant ruling, has dismissed the bail application of one Guddu Khan, who was apprehended with a commercial quantity of heroin. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar, while delivering the judgment on December 22, 2023, emphasized the seriousness of the offence involving narcotics, especially when the quantity is commercial as per the NDPS Act.

Guddu Khan, accused under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act), was denied regular bail in connection with FIR No. 121/2020. The Court noted that the petitioner was caught red-handed with 300 grams of heroin, a quantity classified as 'commercial' under the law. Justice Bhatnagar, in his decision, stated, "considering the period of incarceration as the petitioner has undergone nearly three years two months which is not even near to half of the minimum sentence of ten years, no ground for bail is made out."

The Court's decision hinges significantly on Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which imposes strict conditions for the grant of bail in cases involving commercial quantities of drugs. The judgment read, "The scheme of Section 37 NDPS Act reveals that the exercise of power to grant bail is not only subject to the limitations contained under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., but is also subject to the limitation placed by Section 37 which commences with non-obstante clause."

In his observations, Justice Bhatnagar remarked, "The expression 'reasonable grounds' means something more than prima facie grounds." He further added that the circumstances of the case and the nature of the offence did not provide reasonable grounds to believe that the accused was not guilty of the alleged offence.

The Court also dismissed the argument regarding the non-consideration of CCTV footage and CDR (Call Detail Records) of the petitioner, citing that the immediate apprehension of the accused with the contraband was a significant factor in the decision.

Date of Decision: 22.12.2023

GUDDU KHAN VS STATE NCT OF DELHI

 

Latest Legal News