Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

No Ground for Bail in Commercial Quantity Drug Cases: Delhi High Court Dismisses Bail Application in NDPS Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court, in a significant ruling, has dismissed the bail application of one Guddu Khan, who was apprehended with a commercial quantity of heroin. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar, while delivering the judgment on December 22, 2023, emphasized the seriousness of the offence involving narcotics, especially when the quantity is commercial as per the NDPS Act.

Guddu Khan, accused under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act), was denied regular bail in connection with FIR No. 121/2020. The Court noted that the petitioner was caught red-handed with 300 grams of heroin, a quantity classified as 'commercial' under the law. Justice Bhatnagar, in his decision, stated, "considering the period of incarceration as the petitioner has undergone nearly three years two months which is not even near to half of the minimum sentence of ten years, no ground for bail is made out."

The Court's decision hinges significantly on Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which imposes strict conditions for the grant of bail in cases involving commercial quantities of drugs. The judgment read, "The scheme of Section 37 NDPS Act reveals that the exercise of power to grant bail is not only subject to the limitations contained under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., but is also subject to the limitation placed by Section 37 which commences with non-obstante clause."

In his observations, Justice Bhatnagar remarked, "The expression 'reasonable grounds' means something more than prima facie grounds." He further added that the circumstances of the case and the nature of the offence did not provide reasonable grounds to believe that the accused was not guilty of the alleged offence.

The Court also dismissed the argument regarding the non-consideration of CCTV footage and CDR (Call Detail Records) of the petitioner, citing that the immediate apprehension of the accused with the contraband was a significant factor in the decision.

Date of Decision: 22.12.2023

GUDDU KHAN VS STATE NCT OF DELHI

 

Latest Legal News