MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

No Age Relaxation for Delhi Police Constable Aspirants: High Court Upholds Tribunal’s Decision

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court today upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal’s decision, denying interim relief for age relaxation to candidates who became over-aged due to the non-conduct of the Constable (Executive) recruitment examination by Delhi Police in the years 2021 and 2022. The bench comprising Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta dismissed the petitions challenging the Tribunal’s order.

“We are of the view that in the peculiar facts of this case, no interim order can be granted,” Justice V. Kameswar Rao stated, emphasizing the court’s stance against modifying the recruitment process in light of the petitioners’ requests.

The petitioners had sought relief based on the premise that the recruitment process’s delay, attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic, had inadvertently caused them to surpass the age eligibility criteria. Despite empathetic arguments highlighting the unprecedented impact of the pandemic on recruitment schedules, the High Court observed that any concession would disrupt the established selection procedure.

“It will create a separate category/class of applicants with vested right for age relaxation which is not the intention of the framers of the Recruitment Rules,” the court noted, acknowledging the potential for widespread implications had the relaxation been granted.

The High Court’s decision comes as a reminder of the strict adherence to recruitment rules, even amidst the petitioners’ citing of several precedents where age relaxation had been granted under extraordinary circumstances. The bench clarified that such measures were case-specific and could not be generalized.

The judgment has significant implications for thousands of aspirants who had pinned their hopes on the judiciary to intervene in a matter that has been a point of contention since the pandemic disrupted recruitment calendars across the nation. With this ruling, the examination for the post of Constable (Executive) in Delhi Police is set to proceed as scheduled, without concessions for those who have aged out of the eligibility criteria.

 Date of Decision: November 07, 2023

AMANT KUMAR AND ORS VS  THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS.   

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Del-07-Nov-2023-Amanat-Vs-Commr-Police.pdf"]

Latest Legal News