Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Negligent Bus Driver Admits Guilt: Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Loses Claim Case: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, presided over by HON’BLE JUSTICE Dr. V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR, dealt a blow to the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (A.P.S.R.T.C.) in a compensation case arising from a bus accident. The court dismissed the appeal filed by A.P.S.R.T.C. against an award by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, underscoring the negligence of the bus driver.

The court observed, “Evidence on record discloses that the accident was out of negligent driving of the offending RTC bus by its driver. There are no merits in what the appellant contends here to say anything contrary to that.”

The case revolved around an incident on September 2, 2017, when a passenger, Sri B. Mohana Rao, aged about 70 years, was injured while alighting from A.P.S.R.T.C. bus No.AP-28-Z-5415. The victim suffered serious injuries to his left leg when the bus moved ahead without noticing him, causing him to fall.

The court further noted, “A man aged at 70 years who was still on his own able to attend his work commuting the public transport now all of a sudden suffered disability because of injuries sustained in this accident. He is now dependent on others at that age. The healthy left leg now became not useful for a proper walk because of the injuries he sustained in the accident. Thus, there is loss of natural endowment.”

Despite the appellant’s argument that there was no certificate from a Medical Board regarding the permanent disability, the court upheld the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal. The tribunal had granted Rs.1,00,000 for permanent disability based on strong medical evidence.

In addition to the permanent disability compensation, the Claims Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.6,47,000 under various heads, including medical expenditure, pain and suffering, and other related expenses. The court found no error in the tribunal’s assessment.

The court also addressed the issue of interest rate, stating, “Section 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act permits the Tribunal to grant reasonable interest on the awarded compensation. The rate of interest as granted by the Nationalized Banks on fixed deposit receipts is considered to be the appropriate rate of interest.”

Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal and directed the appellant, A.P.S.R.T.C., to deposit the awarded amounts with the Claims Tribunal within 30 days from the date of the judgment.

This judgment emphasizes the importance of holding negligent parties accountable in motor accident cases and ensuring fair compensation for the victims.

Date of Decision: 31 October, 2023

Andhra Pradesh State Road  Transport Corporation VS Battulak Mohana Rao   

 

Latest Legal News