Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

Negligent Bus Driver Admits Guilt: Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Loses Claim Case: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, presided over by HON’BLE JUSTICE Dr. V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR, dealt a blow to the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (A.P.S.R.T.C.) in a compensation case arising from a bus accident. The court dismissed the appeal filed by A.P.S.R.T.C. against an award by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, underscoring the negligence of the bus driver.

The court observed, “Evidence on record discloses that the accident was out of negligent driving of the offending RTC bus by its driver. There are no merits in what the appellant contends here to say anything contrary to that.”

The case revolved around an incident on September 2, 2017, when a passenger, Sri B. Mohana Rao, aged about 70 years, was injured while alighting from A.P.S.R.T.C. bus No.AP-28-Z-5415. The victim suffered serious injuries to his left leg when the bus moved ahead without noticing him, causing him to fall.

The court further noted, “A man aged at 70 years who was still on his own able to attend his work commuting the public transport now all of a sudden suffered disability because of injuries sustained in this accident. He is now dependent on others at that age. The healthy left leg now became not useful for a proper walk because of the injuries he sustained in the accident. Thus, there is loss of natural endowment.”

Despite the appellant’s argument that there was no certificate from a Medical Board regarding the permanent disability, the court upheld the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal. The tribunal had granted Rs.1,00,000 for permanent disability based on strong medical evidence.

In addition to the permanent disability compensation, the Claims Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.6,47,000 under various heads, including medical expenditure, pain and suffering, and other related expenses. The court found no error in the tribunal’s assessment.

The court also addressed the issue of interest rate, stating, “Section 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act permits the Tribunal to grant reasonable interest on the awarded compensation. The rate of interest as granted by the Nationalized Banks on fixed deposit receipts is considered to be the appropriate rate of interest.”

Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal and directed the appellant, A.P.S.R.T.C., to deposit the awarded amounts with the Claims Tribunal within 30 days from the date of the judgment.

This judgment emphasizes the importance of holding negligent parties accountable in motor accident cases and ensuring fair compensation for the victims.

Date of Decision: 31 October, 2023

Andhra Pradesh State Road  Transport Corporation VS Battulak Mohana Rao   

 

Similar News