Plaintiff In Title Suit Must Prove Own Case On Independent Evidence, Cannot Rely On Weakness Of Defence: Supreme Court Advocate Commissioner's Failure To Localize Land Per Title Deeds Fatal To Encroachment Claim: Andhra Pradesh High Court Enmity Is A Double-Edged Weapon, Can Be Motive For False Implication As Much As For Crime: Allahabad High Court Parity In Bail: Karnataka High Court Grants Relief To Accused In Robbery Case As Mastermind & Main Offenders Were Already Enlarged Specific Performance Denied If Buyer Fails To Prove Continuous Readiness With Funds; Part-Payment Can't Be Forfeited Without Specific Clause: Delhi High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept In Police Stations For Long, Courts Must Judiciously Exercise Power To Release On Supurdagi: Madhya Pradesh High Court Prolonged Incarceration Militates Against Article 21, Constitutional Principles Must Override Section 37 NDPS Rigors: Punjab & Haryana High Court Onus On Individual To Prove Claim Of 'Fear Of Religious Persecution' For Exemption Under Foreigners Act: Calcutta High Court Direct Recruits Cannot Claim Seniority From A Date Prior To Their Entry Into The Cadre: Orissa High Court Sale Deed Executed After Land Vests In State Confers No Title; Post-Vesting Purchaser Can’t Claim Compensation: Calcutta High Court No Right To Blanket Regularization For Contractual Staff; State Must Timely Fill Sanctioned Vacancies Under Reserved Quota: Supreme Court Non-Signatory Collaborator Under 'Deed Of Joint Undertaking' Can Invoke Arbitration Clause As A 'Veritable Party': Supreme Court Insolvency Proceedings Cannot Be Used As Coercive Recovery Mechanism For Complex Contractual Disputes: Supreme Court Legal Heirs Who Were Parties To Sale Cannot Challenge Transfer Under PTCL Act After Long Delay: Supreme Court SC/ST Act | Proceedings To Annul Sale Illegal If Initiated By Legal Heirs Who Were Parties To The Transaction: Supreme Court Consumers Cannot Be Burdened With Tariff Charges Beyond Period Of Service Delivery: Supreme Court Mere Non-Production Of Old Selection Records Or Non-Publication Of All Candidates' Marks No Ground To Direct Appointment: Supreme Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Acquittal In Sohrabuddin Shaikh Encounter Case; Says Prosecution Failed To Prove Conspiracy Dishonour Of Cheque Due To Signature Mismatch Or Incomplete Signature Attracts Section 138 NI Act: Supreme Court 138 NI Act | High Court Cannot Let Off Accused In NI Act Case By Ordering Only Cheque Amount Payment Without Interest Or Penalty: Supreme Court

Nativity Cannot Be Determined Solely by Birthplace: Madras High Court Quashed Tahsildar's Order, Directs Issuance of Nativity Certificate to Minor Born Outside Tamil Nadu

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madras High Court has directed the issuance of a Nativity Certificate to Minor Gaurav Murali, whose application had been previously rejected by the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Musiri Taluk. The judgment, pronounced by Justice G.R. Swaminathan on May 13, 2024, underscores the importance of parental roots and domicile in determining nativity, setting aside the respondent's reliance on the applicant's birthplace and current residence outside Tamil Nadu.

Domicile and Nativity Determination: The court emphasized that the determination of nativity cannot be solely based on the applicant's birthplace or current residence. Justice Swaminathan observed, "The expression 'nativity' denotes the roots on which a person is anchored. It is incorrect to deny a Nativity Certificate merely because the petitioner was born in Mumbai."

The judgment referenced multiple precedents, highlighting that the concept of nativity includes the applicant's familial and ancestral connections to Tamil Nadu. The petitioner's father, Murali Chelliah, born in Musiri Taluk and educated in Tamil Nadu, along with his mother from Pollachi, Coimbatore District, established a strong case for the petitioner's nativity.

Witness Testimonies: Addressing the issue of the petitioner's family residence, the court noted that Murali Chelliah and his wife moved to Mumbai for employment with the Shipping Corporation of India Limited, but maintained their roots in Tamil Nadu. "Merely because a person has been absent from the State on account of employment, he or she will not lose his or her permanent residence in the State," Justice Swaminathan stated, quoting from a similar case.

The judgment extensively discussed the principles of evaluating nativity for certificate issuance. The court held that the authorities' rejection based on the petitioner’s birthplace and current residence contradicted established legal principles. The ruling emphasized, "The petitioner's roots are traceable to Tamil Nadu, and he should be considered a native of the State despite his birth in Mumbai."

Justice Swaminathan remarked, "It is obvious that the expression 'nativity' denotes the roots on which a person is anchored. In these circumstances, rejection of the petitioner's application is incorrect and runs counter to the aforesaid rulings."

The Madras High Court's directive to issue the Nativity Certificate within seven days from the date of the order sends a clear message about the broader criteria for determining nativity. This landmark decision reaffirms the importance of considering familial and ancestral connections over mere birthplace or residence, potentially impacting similar cases in the future and reinforcing the legal framework for nativity determination in Tamil Nadu.

Date of Decision: May 13, 2024

Minor Gaurav Murali, Rep. by his Natural Guardian Father Mr. Murali Chelliah v. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District

 

Latest Legal News