MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Mortgagor’s Right to Redeem Will Survive Until Completion of Sale by Mortgagee: Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment that reinforces the rights of mortgagors, the Karnataka High Court at Dharwad Bench, led by the Hon’ble Mr. Justice C. M. Poonacha, has ruled that a mortgagor’s right to redeem a property remains valid until the completion of its sale by the mortgagee.

The case in question challenged the validity of an auction sale of a mortgaged property conducted on January 12, 1990. The petitioners contested the sale on grounds of alleged procedural irregularities and fraud, arguing that the sale undervalued the property and lacked adequate publicity.

Delivering the judgment, Justice Poonacha emphasized the enduring nature of a mortgagor’s right to redemption, stating, “Mortgagor’s right to redeem will survive until there has been completion of sale by the mortgagee by a registered deed.” This pivotal observation upholds the protective legal framework for mortgagors against potential exploitation in property sales.

The court meticulously scrutinized the procedural aspects of the auction, noting significant lapses, including errors in the property’s description and the failure to account for payments made by the judgment debtor. The judgment also highlighted the duty of courts to ensure fairness and transparency in property auctions.

The decision to set aside the auction sale and remand the matter for further proceedings in the Executing Court marks a crucial step in reinforcing judicial vigilance in mortgage-related disputes. Legal experts view this as a landmark judgment that underscores the judiciary’s commitment to safeguarding individual rights in property transactions.

Date of Decision: 16 November, 2023

Shoukatali Bankapure and Others VS United Western Bank Ltd and Others 

Latest Legal News