Subsequent Declaration Of Juvenility Does Not Vitiate Conviction On Merits: Supreme Court Borrowers Cannot Ignore Bank Accounting Systems And Suspense Accounts To Claim Arbitrary Reductions In Loan Dues: Supreme Court Re-employed Judicial Officers Cannot Claim 6th Pay Commission Scales: Supreme Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Erroneously Exercising Review Jurisdiction On 'Mistaken Notion', Restores Employee's ACP Benefits Trademark Infringement: Defendant Can Cross-Examine Plaintiff On Use Of Brand Name Even If Written Statement Is Not On Record: Supreme Court 'Interest And Welfare Of Child Would Be Best Served': Supreme Court Invokes Parens Patriae In Contempt Plea; Revokes Own Custody Order Mere Absence From MCA Records Cannot Absolve Accused Under Section 138 NI Act If Prima Facie Role Is Shown: Punjab & Haryana High Court Incomplete Or Defective Real Estate Application Cannot Claim Deemed Registration Under Section 5(2) Of RERA Act: Orissa High Court Mere Criminal Antecedents Cannot Justify Invoking 'Organized Crime' Offence Under Section 111 BNS Without Fulfilling Statutory Ingredients: Madhya Pradesh High Court 'Testator's Character & Prior Gifts Justify Unequal Distribution': Madras High Court Upholds Holographic Will Minority Status Cannot Arrest Limitation Period For Appeal If Minor Was Represented By Natural Guardian In Original Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Admission Of Property Boundaries In Family Partition Deeds Destroys Coparceners' Claim That Land Remains Joint Ancestral Property: Karnataka High Court Mesne Profits Must Reflect Open Market Letting Value Rather Than Static Contractual Rates: Delhi High Court Law Graduates Who Fail To Clear AIBE Within Two Years Cannot Practice In Any Court, Tribunal Or Revenue Authority: Allahabad High Court Bombay High Court Slams 'Growing Tendency' To Bypass GST Appeals, Says 'Natural Justice' Not A Blanket Excuse For Writ Petitions Proportionate Cost Only Can Be Awarded On Decreed Amount, Not On Total Plaint Valuation: Kerala High Court

Mortgagor’s Right to Redeem Will Survive Until Completion of Sale by Mortgagee: Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment that reinforces the rights of mortgagors, the Karnataka High Court at Dharwad Bench, led by the Hon’ble Mr. Justice C. M. Poonacha, has ruled that a mortgagor’s right to redeem a property remains valid until the completion of its sale by the mortgagee.

The case in question challenged the validity of an auction sale of a mortgaged property conducted on January 12, 1990. The petitioners contested the sale on grounds of alleged procedural irregularities and fraud, arguing that the sale undervalued the property and lacked adequate publicity.

Delivering the judgment, Justice Poonacha emphasized the enduring nature of a mortgagor’s right to redemption, stating, “Mortgagor’s right to redeem will survive until there has been completion of sale by the mortgagee by a registered deed.” This pivotal observation upholds the protective legal framework for mortgagors against potential exploitation in property sales.

The court meticulously scrutinized the procedural aspects of the auction, noting significant lapses, including errors in the property’s description and the failure to account for payments made by the judgment debtor. The judgment also highlighted the duty of courts to ensure fairness and transparency in property auctions.

The decision to set aside the auction sale and remand the matter for further proceedings in the Executing Court marks a crucial step in reinforcing judicial vigilance in mortgage-related disputes. Legal experts view this as a landmark judgment that underscores the judiciary’s commitment to safeguarding individual rights in property transactions.

Date of Decision: 16 November, 2023

Shoukatali Bankapure and Others VS United Western Bank Ltd and Others 

Latest Legal News