MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Material Improvements in Testimony Lead to Conviction Modification in POCSO Case: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling by the Delhi High Court on November 6, 2023, a previous conviction under the stringent Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act was modified due to what the court termed as "material improvements" in the victim's testimony. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal, after a thorough examination of the case, delivered a judgment that casts a critical eye on the prosecution's reliance on inconsistent testimonies.

Justice Bansal observed, "There have been material improvements in the statements made by the victim," pointing to discrepancies in the description of the assault over time. Initially, the victim, a six-year-old at the time of the incident, stated that the accused had touched her through her clothes, but later statements included more severe allegations of insertion and threats, which were not corroborated by medical evidence.

The court highlighted a "serious lapse in the investigation" due to the prosecution's failure to examine other children present during the incident. This gap in the investigative process raised questions about the credibility of the prosecution's case.

In his ruling, Justice Bansal remarked, "It cannot be disregarded that the victim at the time of the incident was a child of six years and therefore, some leeway has to be provided for minor inconsistencies in her statement." However, he asserted that the contradictions noted were neither minor nor immaterial, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the charge under Section 6 of the POCSO Act was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

While the delay in filing the FIR was deemed sufficiently explained, the court found that the conviction should be modified. The appellant was thus convicted under Section 10 of the POCSO Act for "aggravated sexual assault" and sentenced to five years of rigorous imprisonment.

The case brings to light the complexities of legal proceedings involving young children and the utmost care that must be taken to ensure that their testimonies are handled with sensitivity and diligence. The ruling also underscores the importance of thorough investigations and the critical role they play in upholding justice.

 Date of Decision: 06 November, 2023

SHANTANU VS THE STATE             

                                                    

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Del-06-Nov-2023-Shantnu-Vs-State.pdf"]

Latest Legal News