Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     Smell of Alcohol in Post-Mortem Insufficient to Establish Intoxication: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Liability of Insurance Company in Motor Accident Case    |     No Grounds for Transfer: Free Bus Fare for Women in Telangana Reduces Travel Burden: Telangana High Court Rejects Wife's Petition to Transfer Divorce Case    |    

"Marriage of Judicial Officer Dissolved by Madhya Pradesh High Court on Grounds of Cruelty"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has dissolved the marriage of a judicial officer, Avinash Kumar Tripathi, citing 'continuous harassment and false allegations' by his wife, Smt. Priyanka Tripathi. The Division Bench comprising Justices Sheel Nagu and Devnarayan Mishra delivered the landmark verdict on December 13, 2023, overturning the Family Court's previous decision.

The court's ruling came after careful analysis of multiple allegations of cruelty, false criminal charges, and dowry demands, levied by both parties against each other. The case, First Appeal No. 1664 and 165 of 2018, highlighted complex matrimonial disputes under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

In the detailed judgment, the High Court noted, "The acts/conducts of the respondent constitute cruelty and they cannot be treated as normal wear and tear of matrimonial life." This observation was pivotal in the court's decision to dissolve the marriage solemnized on February 20, 2011.

The appellant-husband, a Judicial Officer in Chhattisgarh, had filed for divorce, alleging that his wife subjected him to mental cruelty, including doubting his character and making false criminal allegations. The respondent-wife, on the other hand, denied these allegations and accused her husband and his family of dowry harassment.

The High Court meticulously examined the evidence and incidents presented, emphasizing the impact of false allegations on the appellant's mental state and professional life. "The respondent continuously filed cases, sought judicial enquiries, made various complaints to higher authorities about the conduct of the appellant, and thus, she has left no stone unturned to embarrass, harass, intimidate, abuse and belittle," stated the Court in its judgment.

In a significant turn of events, the Court allowed the appeals filed by the appellant, leading to the dissolution of the marriage. The judgment underscores the legal recognition of mental cruelty in matrimonial disputes and sets a precedent for future cases involving similar complexities.

Legal experts view this judgment as a critical development in family law, highlighting the importance of addressing mental cruelty and false allegations in matrimonial disputes.

Date of Decision: 13-12-2023

AVINASH KUMAR TRIPATHI  Vs. SMT. PRIYANKA TRIPATHI

Similar News