-
by Admin
07 May 2024 2:49 AM
In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court upheld a lower court's decision granting possession of a property to the respondent in a heated lease dispute. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasmeet Singh, centered on the complexities of lease agreements and the responsibilities of tenants and landlords.
The case, involving an appellant challenging the trial court's order, brought into focus the nuances of the landlord-tenant relationship under the Indian legal framework. Justice Singh, in his detailed judgment, emphasized, "Appellant and defendant no. 1 have not disputed them being tenants under the respondent." This acknowledgment played a crucial role in the court's decision-making process.
The dispute revolved around a property in Shahdara, Delhi, where the appellant and another party were tenants. The crux of the matter lay in the appellant's claim of a second lease agreement with different terms, which the court found to be unregistered and thus inadmissible as the primary evidence.
Justice Singh noted, "In the absence of registration, the said document can only be seen for collateral purpose." This observation was pivotal in dismissing the appellant's claims and reinforced the importance of proper legal documentation in property matters.
The court also scrutinized the provisions of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, underlining that the appellant's tenancy was not protected under the Act due to the rent amount being above the stipulated limit. "The rate of rent is Rs. 5000 per month, therefore tenancy is not a protected tenancy under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958," Justice Singh stated, clarifying the legal stance on such tenancies.
Date of Decision: December 22nd, 2023
NAWABUDDIN VS SHAFFIULLA @ RAJA
