Absence of Videography Alone Not Sufficient For Bail When Custody is Less Than a Year: Delhi High Court Refuses Bail in Commercial Quantity Heroin Use of Permitted Synthetic Colour in Dal Masur Still Constitutes Adulteration: Punjab & Haryana High Court Uphold Conviction Penalty Must Not Result in Civil Death of Professionals: Delhi High Court Reduces Two-Year Suspension of Insolvency Professional, Citing Disproportionate Punishment Right of Cross-Examination is Statutory, Cannot Be Denied When Documents Are Exhibited Later: Chhattisgarh High Court Allows Re-Cross-Examination Compounding after Adjudication is Impermissible under FEMA: Calcutta High Court Declines Post-Adjudication Compounding Plea Tears of a Child Speak Louder Than Words: Bombay HC Confirms Life Term for Man Who Raped 4-Year-Old Alleged Dowry Death After Forced Remarriage: Allahabad High Court Finds No Evidence of Strangulation or Demand “Even If Executant Has No Title, Registrar Must Register the Document If Formalities Are Met” — Supreme Court  Declares Tamil Nadu's Rule 55A(i) Ultra Vires the Registration Act, 1908 Res Judicata Is Not Optional – It’s Public Policy: Supreme Court Slams SEBI for Passing Second Final Order in Fraud Case Against Vital Communications Ltd A Person Has Died… Insurance Company Cannot Escape Liability Without Proving Policy Violation: Supreme Court Slams High Court for Exonerating Insurer in Fatal Accident Case Calling Someone by Caste Name Is Not Enough – It Must Be Publicly Done to Attract SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Acquits All in Jharkhand Land Dispute Case Broken Promises Don’t Make Rape – Mature Adults in Long-Term Relationships Must Accept Responsibility: Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case Against NRI Man Every Broken Relationship Can’t Be Branded Rape: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Retired Judge Accused of Sexual Exploitation on Promise of Marriage No Evidence, No Motive, Not Even Proof of Murder: Supreme Court Slams Conviction, Acquits Man Accused of Killing Wife After Two Years of Marriage You Can’t Assume Silence Is Consent: Supreme Court Sends Back ₹46 Lakh Insurance Dispute to NCDRC for Fresh Determination “Voyage Must Start and End Before Monsoon Sets In — But What If That’s Practically Impossible?” SC Rules Against Insurance Company in Shipping Dispute No Criminal Case Can Be Built on a Land Deal That’s Three Decades Old Without Specific Allegations: Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of FIR Against Ex-JK Housing Chief Just Giving a Call for Protest Doesn’t Make One Criminally Liable - Rail Roko Protest Quashed Against KCR Ex-CM: Telangana High Court Ends 13-Year-Old Proceedings for 2011 Telangana Agitation This Is Not a Case of Greed Simplicitor but a Celebration of Fraud: Karnataka High Court Grants Specific Performance, Slams Vendor for Violating Court Orders Limitation Period Under Section 18-A of Rent Act Mandatory, Delay Not Condonable – Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NRI Landlord's Eviction Against Tenant Custom Department Cannot Revive Time-Barred Show Cause Notices After Seven Years Without Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Notices to JBS Exports Public Property Cannot Be Managed Privately for Decades — Fair Price Shops in Hospitals Must Be Allotted by Auction: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Registered Sale Deed Alone Does Not Dismantle Prior Security Interest: Gauhati High Court Rejects Buyer’s Writ Against SARFAESI Action, Cites Expanded Statutory Definition Old OBC Certificates Won’t Work — Supreme Court Says Cut-Off Date Is Final in Rajasthan Civil Judge Exams

Land Ownership Dispute Resolved: High Court Quashes Order, Emphasizes Substantive Justice Over Technicalities

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, a recent judgment by the Hon’ble [Judge’s Name] has settled a long-standing land ownership dispute, highlighting the paramount importance of substantive justice over procedural technicalities. The verdict, delivered on [Date of Decision], quashed a contentious order and restored mutation entry No. 8744, marking a turning point in the litigation.

The case centered around the validity of a registered Sale Deed dated 20th April 1960, which conveyed a Northern side agricultural land from survey No. 233, spanning 11 Acre and 11 Gunthas. The intricate dispute delved into the clarity of the Sale Deed’s land area and boundaries description, as well as the certification of mutation entry No. 1802.

One of the most compelling observations in the judgment underscored the importance of Civil Court adjudication. The Court highlighted the significance of the Civil Court’s findings in Regular Civil Suit No. 238 of 2000, where the predecessors of the opposing party sought ownership over survey No. 233. The Court’s findings firmly rejected claims of fabrication and lent credence to the genuineness of the Sale Deed.

“The Court’s emphasis on the Civil Court’s thorough examination of the Sale Deed’s validity reinforces the judicial system’s commitment to fairness and thoroughness,” said [Legal Expert’s Name], a prominent legal expert. “This underscores the Court’s insistence on relying on substantive justice rather than being bogged down by procedural technicalities.”

The judgment also raised questions about the certification of mutation entry No. 1802, calling into doubt the basis and circumstances of its certification. The Court’s skepticism further highlighted the need for transparency and proper documentation in land-related matters.

By setting aside the Additional Commissioner’s order, which led to the curtailment of the land area under mutation entry No. 1802, the Court emphasized that the restoration of mutation entry No. 1568 was crucial. This, coupled with a call to approach the Civil Court for any further challenges, reinforced the Court’s commitment to resolving complex land disputes through a meticulous legal process.

“It’s heartening to see the Court prioritize substantive justice and fairness, ensuring that the rightful parties are granted their due while upholding the principles of law,” noted [Legal Analyst’s Name], a seasoned legal analyst.

The judgment’s resounding conclusion and its significant observations reaffirm the legal system’s role in striking a balance between technicality and justice, leaving a lasting impact on land-related disputes in the country.

Date of Decision  [10.08.2023]

Namdev Mahadu Jambhulkar and Others vs The State of Maharashtra and Others

Similar News