Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Kolkata Municipal Corporation’s Demolition Proceedings Upheld by Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Kolkata Municipal Corporation’s (KMC) demolition proceedings have been upheld by the court, dismissing the appellant’s challenge. The judgment, dated December 8, 2022, has significant implications for premises co-owned by the appellant, who contested the initiation of demolition proceedings by KMC under Section 400(1) of the KMC Act, 1980.

Service of Notice via Speed Post Deemed Acceptable: The court ruled that notices sent via speed post, including the one for the hearing scheduled on June 15, 2017, were valid, contrary to the appellant’s claim that they should have been sent via registered post as per Section 557(1) of the KMC Act.

Opportunity to Be Heard Acknowledged: While the appellant argued that his constitutional right to be heard was infringed due to non-receipt of notice, the court noted that Section 400(1) of the KMC Act doesn’t expressly require a personal hearing. It pointed out that the appellant had been offered hearings and had participated in earlier proceedings, satisfying the principles of natural justice.

Failure to Avail Statutory Remedy Leads to Dismissal: The judgment also emphasized the appellant’s failure to avail the statutory remedy of appeal before the Municipal Building Tribunal within the prescribed time frame under the KMC Act. The court opined that the writ court should not entertain the application as the appellant allowed the statutory remedy to become time-barred.

The court ultimately upheld the ju”gmen’ and order dated December 8, 2022, and the demolition order dated June 19, 2017. It highlighted that the appellant had received adequate notice and opportunity to show cause against the demolition proceedings. The failure to avail the statutory remedy within the prescribed time frame led to the dismissal of the appeal.

This judgment reaffirms the importance of following due process in municipal matters and the significance of timely statutory remedies.

Date of Decision: 19.10.2023

Md. Ali Mirza VS Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Similar News