Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Kolkata Municipal Corporation’s Demolition Proceedings Upheld by Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Kolkata Municipal Corporation’s (KMC) demolition proceedings have been upheld by the court, dismissing the appellant’s challenge. The judgment, dated December 8, 2022, has significant implications for premises co-owned by the appellant, who contested the initiation of demolition proceedings by KMC under Section 400(1) of the KMC Act, 1980.

Service of Notice via Speed Post Deemed Acceptable: The court ruled that notices sent via speed post, including the one for the hearing scheduled on June 15, 2017, were valid, contrary to the appellant’s claim that they should have been sent via registered post as per Section 557(1) of the KMC Act.

Opportunity to Be Heard Acknowledged: While the appellant argued that his constitutional right to be heard was infringed due to non-receipt of notice, the court noted that Section 400(1) of the KMC Act doesn’t expressly require a personal hearing. It pointed out that the appellant had been offered hearings and had participated in earlier proceedings, satisfying the principles of natural justice.

Failure to Avail Statutory Remedy Leads to Dismissal: The judgment also emphasized the appellant’s failure to avail the statutory remedy of appeal before the Municipal Building Tribunal within the prescribed time frame under the KMC Act. The court opined that the writ court should not entertain the application as the appellant allowed the statutory remedy to become time-barred.

The court ultimately upheld the ju”gmen’ and order dated December 8, 2022, and the demolition order dated June 19, 2017. It highlighted that the appellant had received adequate notice and opportunity to show cause against the demolition proceedings. The failure to avail the statutory remedy within the prescribed time frame led to the dismissal of the appeal.

This judgment reaffirms the importance of following due process in municipal matters and the significance of timely statutory remedies.

Date of Decision: 19.10.2023

Md. Ali Mirza VS Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Latest Legal News