Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Act Case: Prima Facie Case Not Made Out

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Kerala High Court, in a recent judgment, granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a case filed under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (SC/ST Act). The court's decision was based on the observation that there was a lack of sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case under the Act.

The case in question, registered as Crime No. 983/2023 of Neyyar Dam Police Station, stemmed from an incident during a public protest. Allegations were made against the accused, who were involved in the protest, of abusing the caste name of the Panchayat President, who belonged to a Scheduled Tribe, and manhandling individuals during the protest.

In delivering the judgment, the Honorable Mr. Justice P.G. Ajithkumar emphasized the need for a prima facie case to be established under the SC/ST Act for the bar created by Section 18 to apply. He cited a previous Supreme Court decision, stating, "If a prima facie case has not been made out attracting the provisions of the SC/ST Act, the bar created by Section 18 to the grant of anticipatory bail is not attracted."

The court further noted that the allegations primarily revolved around a public agitation regarding the relocation of a public school, and other than the altercation during the protest, there was no evidence of manhandling or assault. The accused argued that a false case had been lodged against them for political reasons.

Regarding the charges under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the court found that the injuries reported in the case did not indicate serious harm. The judge stated, "From the materials available on record, it is evident that the alleged assault and hurling of humiliating words occurred during the course of the picketing. When the aforementioned words were said to have been uttered by the assailants in the above context, the same are in the nature of a statement in protest. It cannot, prima facie, be said that the said words amounted to an offence under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act."

Kerala High Court allowed the appeals and set aside the orders of the Special Court, granting anticipatory bail to the appellants subject to certain conditions. These conditions include not influencing or intimidating witnesses, cooperating with the investigating officer, and refraining from further offenses during the bail period.

 

 Date of Decision: December 21, 2023

BIJU CHANDRAN VS STATE OF KERALA

Latest Legal News