Writ Jurisdiction Not Appropriate For Adjudicating Complex Title Disputes; Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Madhya Pradesh High Court Joint Account Holder Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act If Not A Signatory To Dishonoured Cheque: Allahabad High Court Private Individuals Accepting Money Can Be Prosecuted Under MPID Act; Nomenclature As 'Loan' Irrelevant: Supreme Court Nomenclature Of Transaction As 'Loan' Irrelevant; If Ingredients Met, It Is A 'Deposit' Under MPID Act: Supreme Court Pleadings Must State Material Facts, Not Evidence; Deficiency In Pleading Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal: Supreme Court Denial Of Remission Cannot Rest Solely On Heinousness Of Crime; Justice Doesn't Permit Permanent Incarceration In Shadow Of Worst Act: Supreme Court Second Application For Rejection Of Plaint Barred By Res Judicata If Earlier Order Attained Finality: Supreme Court Section 6(5) Hindu Succession Act Is A Saving Clause, Not A Jurisdictional Bar To Partition Suits: Supreme Court Sale Of Natural Gas Via Common Carrier Pipelines Is An Inter-State Sale; UP Has No Jurisdiction To Levy VAT: Supreme Court Mediclaim Reimbursement Not Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation; Tortfeasor Can’t Benefit From Claimant’s Prudence: Supreme Court Rules Of Procedure Are Handmaid Of Justice, Not Mistress; Striking Off Defence Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Not Mechanical: Supreme Court Power To Strike Off Tenant's Defense Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Discretionary, Not To Be Exercised Mechanically: Supreme Court Areas Urbanised Before 1959 Don't Require Separate Notification To Fall Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Delhi High Court Police Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts To Perform Compensatory Justice; Direct Nexus With Offence Essential: Bombay High Court FSL Probe Before Electronic Evidence Meets Section 65B Admissibility Standards: Gujarat High Court Court Shouldn't Adjudicate Rights At Stage Of Granting Leave Under Section 92 CPC, Only Prima Facie Case Required: Allahabad High Court Right To Seek Bail Based On Non-Furnishing Of 'Grounds Of Arrest' Applies Only Prospectively From November 6, 2025: Madras High Court Prior Exposure To Accused Before TIP Renders Identification Meaningless: Delhi High Court Acquits Four In Uphaar Cinema Murder Case No Particular Format Prescribed For 'Proposed Resolution' In No-Confidence Motion; Intention Of Members To Be Gathered From Document As A Whole: Orissa High Court Trial Court Cannot Grant Temporary Injunction Without Adverting To Allegations Of Fraud And Collusion: Calcutta High Court "Ganja" Definition Under NDPS Act Excludes Roots & Stems: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail As Seized Weight Included Whole Plants Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Doesn't Displace Section 37 NDPS Mandate In Commercial Quantity Cases: Orissa High Court

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case - ‘Sudden Quarrel’ and Lack of Intention to Kill”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 19th July 2023, In a significant ruling, the High Court of Karnataka granted bail to the three accused involved in a criminal case of fatal assault, highlighting that the incident arose from a “sudden quarrel” and lacked any apparent intention to cause death. The case, titled Criminal Petition No. 4377 of 2023, saw the accused charged under Sections 504, 448, 323, 324, 354, and 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) after the complainant succumbed to injuries sustained during the altercation.*

The court, presided over by the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Nawaz, observed that there was no evidence suggesting the accused had intended to cause fatal injuries. The judgment noted that both parties had sustained injuries during the altercation, and a counter-complaint was also registered in connection with the same incident.

Justice Mohammad Nawaz, in his order, stated: “At this stage, it cannot be said that there was any intention on the part of the accused to do away with the life of the deceased. However, it is a matter for trial.” He emphasized that the prosecution must establish the charges against the accused in a full-fledged trial.

The incident occurred on 2nd April 2023, when a group of three youths, allegedly drunk and playing loud music, created a disturbance on the road. The complainant confronted them, leading to a verbal altercation and physical assault. Both parties sustained injuries in the confrontation, and the complainant succumbed to pulmonary embolism resulting from multiple injuries on 5th April 2023.

The court granted bail to the accused – Mr. Anirudha Samantaray, Mr. Basudev Samantaray, and Mr. Abhishek Singh – subject to certain conditions, including executing a personal bond and providing sureties. The petitioners must also attend the concerned police station regularly and refrain from tampering with witnesses or committing any further offenses.

The High Court’s decision offers temporary relief to the accused, who have maintained their innocence and will now await the full trial to ascertain their legal fate.*

DATE OF DECISION: 19th July 2023

MR.ANIRUDHA SAMANTARAY vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA 

Latest Legal News