Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     When Two Accused Face Identical Charges, One Cannot Be Convicted While the Other is Acquitted: Supreme Court Emphasizes Principle of Parity in Acquittal    |     Supreme Court Limits Interim Protection for Financial Institutions, Modifies Order on FIRs Filed by Borrowers    |     Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report    |     No Sign of Recent Intercourse; No Injury Was Found On Her Body Or Private Parts: Gauhati High Court Acquits Two In Gang Rape Case    |     Failure to Disclose Relationship with Key Stakeholder Led to Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Gujarat High Court    |     Strict Compliance with UAPA's 7-Day Timeline for Sanctions is Essential:  Supreme Court    |     PAT Teachers Entitled to Regularization from 2014, Quashes Prospective Regularization as Arbitrary: Himachal Pradesh High Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Anonymity Protections for Victims in Sensitive Cases: Right to Privacy Prevails Over Right to Information    |     Certified Copy of Will Admissible Under Registration Act, 1908: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea for Production of Original Will    |     Injuries on Non-Vital Parts Do Not Warrant Conviction for Attempt to Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC    |     Classification Based on Wikipedia Data Inadmissible; Tribunal to Reassess Using Actual Financial Records: PH High Court Orders Reconsideration of Wage Dispute    |     Mere Delay in Initiation Does Not Justify Reduction of Damages: Jharkhand High Court on Provident Fund Defaults    |     Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     An Award that Shocks the Conscience of the Court Cannot Stand, Especially When Public Money is Involved: Calcutta HC Reduces Quantum by Half    |     Trademark Transaction Within Territoriality Principle Subject to Indian Tax Laws: Bombay High Court Dismisses Hindustan Unilever's Petition on Non-Deduction of TDS    |     Concealment of Material Facts Bars Relief under Article 226: SC Reprimands Petitioners for Lack of Bonafides    |     Without Determination of the Will's Genuineness, Partition is Impossible: Supreme Court on Liberal Approach to Pleading Amendments    |     Candidates Cannot Challenge a Selection Process After Participating Without Protest : Delhi High Court Upholds ISRO's Administrative Officer Recruitment    |     Invalid Bank Guarantee Invocation Found Fatal to Recovery Claim: Delhi High Court Dismisses GAIL’s Appeal    |     Adverse Remarks in APAR Recorded Without Objectivity and Likely Motivated by Bias: Delhi High Court Quashes Biased APAR Downgrade of CRPF Officer    |    

Jai Hind - Let us Live United with Nature" Remark Deemed Relevant by Madurai High Court in TNPSC Examination Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court today ruled in favor of a petitioner whose essay answer was previously invalidated by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC). The case revolved around the petitioner's use of the phrase "Jai Hind, Let us live united with nature" in a TNPSC examination essay, which the Commission had deemed irrelevant and impertinent, leading to the invalidation of her answer paper.

Justice Battu Devanand, presiding over the case, observed that the petitioner's concluding remark in the essay was "very relevant and appropriate to the question" and that such writing "cannot be treated as impertinent remarks or to give some indication to the examiner about her identity." This pivotal observation underscored the judgment which has now set a precedent for how examination bodies evaluate answer scripts.

The petitioner had approached the court challenging the TNPSC's decision to invalidate her essay answer in the Combined Civil Services Examination-II Group-II Services. She argued that her conclusion was highly pertinent to the essay's topic on the importance and conservation of natural resources.

The Court's decision was rooted in a broad interpretation of relevance and patriotism in academic responses. "For development and prosperity of the country, the conservation of natural resources is very essential and important," Justice Devanand noted in his judgment. He further added, "While writing an essay, on the issue of importance and conservation of natural resources, at conclusion writing as 'Jai Hind – Let us live united with nature' by the petitioner is very relevant."

The ruling has directed the TNPSC to re-evaluate the petitioner's answer paper and consider her for the respective position, should she meet the necessary criteria. This decision has been hailed as a landmark judgment, emphasizing the importance of contextual interpretation and the role of patriotism in academic discourse.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

M.Kalpana  VS The Secretary 

Similar News