Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Jai Hind - Let us Live United with Nature" Remark Deemed Relevant by Madurai High Court in TNPSC Examination Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court today ruled in favor of a petitioner whose essay answer was previously invalidated by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC). The case revolved around the petitioner's use of the phrase "Jai Hind, Let us live united with nature" in a TNPSC examination essay, which the Commission had deemed irrelevant and impertinent, leading to the invalidation of her answer paper.

Justice Battu Devanand, presiding over the case, observed that the petitioner's concluding remark in the essay was "very relevant and appropriate to the question" and that such writing "cannot be treated as impertinent remarks or to give some indication to the examiner about her identity." This pivotal observation underscored the judgment which has now set a precedent for how examination bodies evaluate answer scripts.

The petitioner had approached the court challenging the TNPSC's decision to invalidate her essay answer in the Combined Civil Services Examination-II Group-II Services. She argued that her conclusion was highly pertinent to the essay's topic on the importance and conservation of natural resources.

The Court's decision was rooted in a broad interpretation of relevance and patriotism in academic responses. "For development and prosperity of the country, the conservation of natural resources is very essential and important," Justice Devanand noted in his judgment. He further added, "While writing an essay, on the issue of importance and conservation of natural resources, at conclusion writing as 'Jai Hind – Let us live united with nature' by the petitioner is very relevant."

The ruling has directed the TNPSC to re-evaluate the petitioner's answer paper and consider her for the respective position, should she meet the necessary criteria. This decision has been hailed as a landmark judgment, emphasizing the importance of contextual interpretation and the role of patriotism in academic discourse.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

M.Kalpana  VS The Secretary 

Latest Legal News