Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Jai Hind - Let us Live United with Nature" Remark Deemed Relevant by Madurai High Court in TNPSC Examination Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court today ruled in favor of a petitioner whose essay answer was previously invalidated by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC). The case revolved around the petitioner's use of the phrase "Jai Hind, Let us live united with nature" in a TNPSC examination essay, which the Commission had deemed irrelevant and impertinent, leading to the invalidation of her answer paper.

Justice Battu Devanand, presiding over the case, observed that the petitioner's concluding remark in the essay was "very relevant and appropriate to the question" and that such writing "cannot be treated as impertinent remarks or to give some indication to the examiner about her identity." This pivotal observation underscored the judgment which has now set a precedent for how examination bodies evaluate answer scripts.

The petitioner had approached the court challenging the TNPSC's decision to invalidate her essay answer in the Combined Civil Services Examination-II Group-II Services. She argued that her conclusion was highly pertinent to the essay's topic on the importance and conservation of natural resources.

The Court's decision was rooted in a broad interpretation of relevance and patriotism in academic responses. "For development and prosperity of the country, the conservation of natural resources is very essential and important," Justice Devanand noted in his judgment. He further added, "While writing an essay, on the issue of importance and conservation of natural resources, at conclusion writing as 'Jai Hind – Let us live united with nature' by the petitioner is very relevant."

The ruling has directed the TNPSC to re-evaluate the petitioner's answer paper and consider her for the respective position, should she meet the necessary criteria. This decision has been hailed as a landmark judgment, emphasizing the importance of contextual interpretation and the role of patriotism in academic discourse.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

M.Kalpana  VS The Secretary 

Latest Legal News