Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Jai Hind - Let us Live United with Nature" Remark Deemed Relevant by Madurai High Court in TNPSC Examination Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court today ruled in favor of a petitioner whose essay answer was previously invalidated by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC). The case revolved around the petitioner's use of the phrase "Jai Hind, Let us live united with nature" in a TNPSC examination essay, which the Commission had deemed irrelevant and impertinent, leading to the invalidation of her answer paper.

Justice Battu Devanand, presiding over the case, observed that the petitioner's concluding remark in the essay was "very relevant and appropriate to the question" and that such writing "cannot be treated as impertinent remarks or to give some indication to the examiner about her identity." This pivotal observation underscored the judgment which has now set a precedent for how examination bodies evaluate answer scripts.

The petitioner had approached the court challenging the TNPSC's decision to invalidate her essay answer in the Combined Civil Services Examination-II Group-II Services. She argued that her conclusion was highly pertinent to the essay's topic on the importance and conservation of natural resources.

The Court's decision was rooted in a broad interpretation of relevance and patriotism in academic responses. "For development and prosperity of the country, the conservation of natural resources is very essential and important," Justice Devanand noted in his judgment. He further added, "While writing an essay, on the issue of importance and conservation of natural resources, at conclusion writing as 'Jai Hind – Let us live united with nature' by the petitioner is very relevant."

The ruling has directed the TNPSC to re-evaluate the petitioner's answer paper and consider her for the respective position, should she meet the necessary criteria. This decision has been hailed as a landmark judgment, emphasizing the importance of contextual interpretation and the role of patriotism in academic discourse.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

M.Kalpana  VS The Secretary 

Latest Legal News