MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Jai Hind - Let us Live United with Nature" Remark Deemed Relevant by Madurai High Court in TNPSC Examination Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court today ruled in favor of a petitioner whose essay answer was previously invalidated by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC). The case revolved around the petitioner's use of the phrase "Jai Hind, Let us live united with nature" in a TNPSC examination essay, which the Commission had deemed irrelevant and impertinent, leading to the invalidation of her answer paper.

Justice Battu Devanand, presiding over the case, observed that the petitioner's concluding remark in the essay was "very relevant and appropriate to the question" and that such writing "cannot be treated as impertinent remarks or to give some indication to the examiner about her identity." This pivotal observation underscored the judgment which has now set a precedent for how examination bodies evaluate answer scripts.

The petitioner had approached the court challenging the TNPSC's decision to invalidate her essay answer in the Combined Civil Services Examination-II Group-II Services. She argued that her conclusion was highly pertinent to the essay's topic on the importance and conservation of natural resources.

The Court's decision was rooted in a broad interpretation of relevance and patriotism in academic responses. "For development and prosperity of the country, the conservation of natural resources is very essential and important," Justice Devanand noted in his judgment. He further added, "While writing an essay, on the issue of importance and conservation of natural resources, at conclusion writing as 'Jai Hind – Let us live united with nature' by the petitioner is very relevant."

The ruling has directed the TNPSC to re-evaluate the petitioner's answer paper and consider her for the respective position, should she meet the necessary criteria. This decision has been hailed as a landmark judgment, emphasizing the importance of contextual interpretation and the role of patriotism in academic discourse.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

M.Kalpana  VS The Secretary 

Latest Legal News