SARFAESI Act | Sale Certificate Cannot Be Issued In Favour Of A Third-Party Nominee Who Was Not The Auction Bidder: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Auction Sale Conducted In Violation Of Mandatory Rules And Subsisting Restraint Order Is Vitiated In Law: Supreme Court Recovery Of Alleged Overpayment From A Separate, Unrelated Contract Without Notice Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Supreme Court IBC | Adjudicating Authority Has Power To Recall CIRP Admission Order If It Was Obtained Through Fraud Or Collusion: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act | Presumption Of Service Is Attracted Once Notice Is Dispatched To Correct Address Of Drawer: Supreme Court Operation Of Hookah Bars In Restaurants Constitutes Violation Of Rule 4(3) Of COTPA Rules: Allahabad High Court High Court Cannot Recall Order Passed On Merits Even If Passed Ex-Parte: Bombay High Court Administrative Authorities Cannot Pass Orders Having Civil Consequences Without Meaningful Consideration Of The Affected Employee’s Response: Allahabad High Court Discharge Application Cannot Be Converted Into A 'Mini-Trial' To Assess Evidentiary Sufficiency: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Allegations Are Falsified By Documents Annexed To Plaint Or Based On Non-Existent Law: Bombay High Court Police Cannot Interfere In Pending Civil Disputes Or Act As Arbitrators In Private Property Conflicts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Contract For Personal Services Between Doctor And Hospital Is Determinable And Not Specifically Enforceable: Calcutta High Court Allegations Of Sexual Offences Cannot Be Quashed Based On Contradictory Evidence Requiring Mini-Trial: Delhi High Court PMLA Adjudication | Failure To Expressly Discuss Every Submission In Written Synopsis Does Not Vitiate Order Under Principles Of Natural Justice: Karnataka High Court Prolonged Separation Of Sixteen Years Constitutes Cruelty Under Special Marriage Act: Kerala High Court Grants Divorce Order XII Rule 6 CPC | Decree Of Possession Can Be Granted On Admissions Even If Relationship Of Landlord-Tenant Is Disputed: Delhi High Court Non-Framing Of Issues Under Order XIV CPC Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Is Proved: Madras High Court Order 47 Rule 1 CPC | Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cure Failure To Produce Evidence That Was Within Knowledge Of Applicant: Madhya Pradesh High Court Codicil To A Will Must Be Proved Like A Will; Propounder Must Remove All Suspicious Circumstances: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Lodging Of Section 498-A IPC Case Not Cruelty: Telangana High Court Sets Aside Divorce Decree Order XVII Rule 3 CPC | Power To Dismiss Suit For Default Of Evidence Is Drastic And Must Be Exercised Sparingly: Punjab & Haryana High Court

In Sexual Harassment Cases Magistrate Should Direct to Register FIR 156(3) Cr.P.C: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


D.D-August 05, 2022

The Supreme Court recently declared that police should not put impediments in the way of victims reporting sexual harassment by refusing to file a FIR.

Apex Court Stated "It is crucial that all courts continue to recognise that the legal procedure tends to be considerably more burdensome for complainants who are potentially suffering with trauma and societal shame as a result of the unjustified stigma linked to victims of sexual harassment and assault."

Apex Court observed that wherever a cognizable offence is established in a complaint, the police must file a FIR.

The Supreme Court stated that it was regrettable that the police did nothing in this situation. Every police officer has a moral obligation to perform their duties with integrity for the community. The police must be aware that they are frequently the first people a victim of a crime or a complainant contacts. They ought to follow the law and make it easy to file a FIR. Of course, they have to be neutral and fair to all members of the public. This is even more crucial in cases of sexual harassment or violence because the victims, who are typically women, experience severe social shame when they try to report it.

The Apex Court also observed that  the courts must work to prevent burdening the victims with the process of trying to bring the offenders to justice. People who are upset shouldn't have to jump through hoops just to file a complaint and start an investigation, especially if their complaint prima facie establishes a cognizable offence.

XYZ

Vs

State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors

Download Judgment

[gview file="http://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/4084_2022_3_19_37087_Judgement_05-Aug-2022.pdf"]

Latest Legal News