Law Does Not Countenance Resurrection Of Stale Claims Through Inventive Drafting: Karnataka High Court Rejects 20-Year-Old Partition Dispute CPC Provisions Cannot Be Used to Transfer Consumer Complaints Across States: NCDRC Invokes Section 62 to End Forum-Shifting Ordeal in Nirmal Spinning Mills Case FSSA Provisions Prevail Over PFA Act In Cases Of Overlapping Jurisdiction, Prosecution Under Old Act Impermissible: J&K High Court Motive Pales Into Significance When Direct Ocular Evidence Establishes Crime; Enmity Is A Double-Edged Sword: Allahabad High Court Plaintiff Cannot Succeed Merely On Weakness Of Defence; Initial Burden To Prove Claim Rests On Claimant: Madras High Court Witness Threats Noted By Higher Courts Disentitle Convict To Suspension Of Sentence: Gujarat High Court Family Court Orders Must Be Enforced Immediately, Pendency Of Applications No Excuse For Disobedience: Delhi High Court 'Fraud And Justice Never Dwell Together': Karnataka High Court Reverses Order To Grant Land Based On Fabricated Records Development Authority Competent To Sanction Land Use Conversion From Residential To Nursing Home If Permitted Under Master Plan & Zoning Regulations: Allahabad High Court Notification Changing Import Policy From 'Free' To 'Restricted' Operative Only From Exact Time Of Publication In E-Gazette: Delhi High Court On Name Of Protection of the Complainer Excluding Relevant Defence Evidence in Sexual Offences Trials May Breach Fair Trial Rights: UK Supreme Court Boundaries In Sale Deed Prevail Over Discrepancy In Property Description; Adverse Possession Begins From Date Of Hostile Notice: Punjab & Haryana HC Supreme Court of UK Upholds HMRC Decision: Professional Fees Incurred by Investment Holding Company Are Capital Expenditure Criminal Law Cannot Be Used To Silence Citizens Questioning Legality Of Police Action: Madras High Court Quashes Obstruction Case Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs Centre To Treat Ashok Khemka As Empaneled For Future Assignments, Says Denying Relaxation Granted To Peers Is Discriminatory Section 34 Court Cannot Substitute Arbitrator’s Plausible View With Its Own; Not Bound By Technical Rules Of Evidence Act: Madras High Court Article 227 Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Reopen Decrees Finalized Four Decades Ago: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Challenge To 1985 Order Daughter Has No Right To Inherit Agricultural Land If Succession Opened Before 2005 HSA Amendment: Delhi High Court Rejects Plaint Indian Trust Act Inapplicable To Public Religious Endowments; Sale Of Charity Property Without HR&CE Commissioner's Permission Void: Madras High Court Supreme Court Clarifies Status of Collateral Warranties Under Construction Contracts FIR Quashed Against Newsclick: PMLA Proceedings Cannot Stand Alone Without A Predicate Offence, Rules Delhi High Court Assessee Claiming TDS Exemption On "Reimbursement" To Non-Residents Must Obtain Mandatory Tax Determination Under Section 195(2): Madras High Court

In Sexual Harassment Cases Magistrate Should Direct to Register FIR 156(3) Cr.P.C: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


D.D-August 05, 2022

The Supreme Court recently declared that police should not put impediments in the way of victims reporting sexual harassment by refusing to file a FIR.

Apex Court Stated "It is crucial that all courts continue to recognise that the legal procedure tends to be considerably more burdensome for complainants who are potentially suffering with trauma and societal shame as a result of the unjustified stigma linked to victims of sexual harassment and assault."

Apex Court observed that wherever a cognizable offence is established in a complaint, the police must file a FIR.

The Supreme Court stated that it was regrettable that the police did nothing in this situation. Every police officer has a moral obligation to perform their duties with integrity for the community. The police must be aware that they are frequently the first people a victim of a crime or a complainant contacts. They ought to follow the law and make it easy to file a FIR. Of course, they have to be neutral and fair to all members of the public. This is even more crucial in cases of sexual harassment or violence because the victims, who are typically women, experience severe social shame when they try to report it.

The Apex Court also observed that  the courts must work to prevent burdening the victims with the process of trying to bring the offenders to justice. People who are upset shouldn't have to jump through hoops just to file a complaint and start an investigation, especially if their complaint prima facie establishes a cognizable offence.

XYZ

Vs

State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors

Download Judgment

[gview file="http://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/4084_2022_3_19_37087_Judgement_05-Aug-2022.pdf"]

Latest Legal News