Benefit Of Acquittal Can Be Extended To Non-Appealing Co-Accused If Prosecution Case Is Found To Be Fundamentally Unreliable: Madras High Court Hindu Marriage Act | Petition For Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Serves As A Valid Defence Against Allegations Of Desertion: Kerala High Court Employee Has No Vested Right To Seek Or Retain Additional Charge; Writ Petition Not Maintainable To Challenge Its Withdrawal: Madhya Pradesh High Court Insurance Act | Insurer Cannot Waive Statutory Deadline For Premium Payment Under Bank Guarantee; No Estoppel Against Statute: NCDRC Absence Of Crime Number In Inquest Report & Discrepancy In Sec 157 CrPC Special Report Renders FIR Doubtful: Allahabad High Court MTP Act  | Termination Of Pregnancy Beyond 24 Weeks Permissible If It Involves Risk To Life Or Grave Injury To Mental Health Of The Victim: Gujarat High Court Section 174A IPC | FIR Cannot Be Quashed If Process Server Reports Indicate Failure To Serve At Ordinary Residence: Delhi High Court Issues Guidelines Insolvency Petition | Transferees Of Debtor Cannot Substitute Debtor To Rebut Allegation Of Intent To Defeat Creditors Under Section 6(b) Provincial Insolvency Act: High Court Medical Negligence | Doctor Cannot Be Held Liable For Choosing One Reasonable Course Of Treatment Over Another: Bombay High Court Cruelty | Non-Registration Of FIR Cannot Be Ground To Discredit Testimony Of Wife Seeking Divorce: Jharkhand High Court No Deception At Inception: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Revive Cheating Charges Against Borrower After One-Time Settlement Consumer Protection Act | Doctrine Of 'Caveat Emptor' Subservient To 'Caveat Venditor'; Auctioneer Liable For Sale Of Encumbered Vehicle: State Commission Section 127 CrPC | Past Compromise Not An Eternal Estoppel To Bar Wife From Seeking Enhancement In Maintenance: Orissa High Court States Can Prescribe Higher Qualifications Than UGC Norms, Additional Tests Promote Meritocracy: Punjab & Haryana High Court Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cancel Registered Sale Deed Or Adjudicate Title Disputes: Telangana High Court Principal Employer Cannot Abdicate Statutory Liability For Overtime Wages Of Contract Labour Despite Contractual Indemnity Clauses: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory For Invoking SC/ST Act Provisions If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked For Re-valuation Of Structures Once Compensation Dispute Is Adjudicated Under Section 64 RFCTLARR Act: Telangana High Court Revenue Village Naming | Government Must Ensure Names Do Not Reflect Any Person, Caste, Or Religion Under Policy Guidelines: Rajasthan High Court Section 138 NI Act | Complainant Must Prove Proprietorship Of Firm To Establish Status As 'Payee' Or 'Holder In Due Course': Himachal Pradesh High Court

In Sexual Harassment Cases Magistrate Should Direct to Register FIR 156(3) Cr.P.C: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


D.D-August 05, 2022

The Supreme Court recently declared that police should not put impediments in the way of victims reporting sexual harassment by refusing to file a FIR.

Apex Court Stated "It is crucial that all courts continue to recognise that the legal procedure tends to be considerably more burdensome for complainants who are potentially suffering with trauma and societal shame as a result of the unjustified stigma linked to victims of sexual harassment and assault."

Apex Court observed that wherever a cognizable offence is established in a complaint, the police must file a FIR.

The Supreme Court stated that it was regrettable that the police did nothing in this situation. Every police officer has a moral obligation to perform their duties with integrity for the community. The police must be aware that they are frequently the first people a victim of a crime or a complainant contacts. They ought to follow the law and make it easy to file a FIR. Of course, they have to be neutral and fair to all members of the public. This is even more crucial in cases of sexual harassment or violence because the victims, who are typically women, experience severe social shame when they try to report it.

The Apex Court also observed that  the courts must work to prevent burdening the victims with the process of trying to bring the offenders to justice. People who are upset shouldn't have to jump through hoops just to file a complaint and start an investigation, especially if their complaint prima facie establishes a cognizable offence.

XYZ

Vs

State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors

Download Judgment

[gview file="http://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/4084_2022_3_19_37087_Judgement_05-Aug-2022.pdf"]

Latest Legal News