Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

In a Gang Rape Case Delhi High Court Denies Transfer of Case to CBI

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment delivered by the High Court of Delhi, Justice Amit Bansal dismissed a petition seeking the transfer of an investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The case, involving allegations of assault, gang rape, and the death of the petitioner's mother, has been a subject of legal scrutiny for its complexities and the sensitivity of the allegations.

Justice Bansal, in his judgment delivered on January 4, 2024, meticulously addressed the petition filed by Manish Chadha, a qualified lawyer appearing in person. Chadha sought a transfer of the investigation of FIR No.440/2020, under Sections 308/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), to the CBI or any other quasi-judicial body.

The Court, after thorough consideration of the facts and arguments presented, concurred with the findings and directions of the trial court. Justice Bansal stated, “The trial court's comprehensive review of the investigation, including allegations of gang rape, cause of death, and theft, led to additional directions for further investigation and filing of a supplementary chargesheet.” He further emphasized that "an overall analysis of the aforesaid order passed by the Trial Court would show that wherever the Trial Court was not satisfied with the investigation carried out, it has directed further investigation or sought an explanation from the investigating agency.”

In his analysis, Justice Bansal referred to various Supreme Court precedents, underlining the principle that directing investigations to the CBI is an extraordinary power, to be exercised sparingly and in exceptional situations. He cited notable cases such as State of West Bengal And Ors. v. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, West Bengal and Ors. and Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh And Ors., to reinforce this legal standpoint.

The judgment also acknowledged the role of the Amicus Curiae, Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate, whose expertise in criminal law was pivotal in assisting the Court.

High Court found no merit in the petitioner’s allegations of police collusion with the accused persons or inadequacy in the investigation. As a result, the petition for the transfer of the investigation was dismissed, supporting the trial court’s capability to handle the complexities of the case with due diligence.

Date of Decision: January 4, 2024

MANISH CHADHA VS STATE GOVT OF NCT AND ORS

 

Latest Legal News