Benefit Of Acquittal Can Be Extended To Non-Appealing Co-Accused If Prosecution Case Is Found To Be Fundamentally Unreliable: Madras High Court Hindu Marriage Act | Petition For Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Serves As A Valid Defence Against Allegations Of Desertion: Kerala High Court Employee Has No Vested Right To Seek Or Retain Additional Charge; Writ Petition Not Maintainable To Challenge Its Withdrawal: Madhya Pradesh High Court Insurance Act | Insurer Cannot Waive Statutory Deadline For Premium Payment Under Bank Guarantee; No Estoppel Against Statute: NCDRC Absence Of Crime Number In Inquest Report & Discrepancy In Sec 157 CrPC Special Report Renders FIR Doubtful: Allahabad High Court MTP Act  | Termination Of Pregnancy Beyond 24 Weeks Permissible If It Involves Risk To Life Or Grave Injury To Mental Health Of The Victim: Gujarat High Court Section 174A IPC | FIR Cannot Be Quashed If Process Server Reports Indicate Failure To Serve At Ordinary Residence: Delhi High Court Issues Guidelines Insolvency Petition | Transferees Of Debtor Cannot Substitute Debtor To Rebut Allegation Of Intent To Defeat Creditors Under Section 6(b) Provincial Insolvency Act: High Court Medical Negligence | Doctor Cannot Be Held Liable For Choosing One Reasonable Course Of Treatment Over Another: Bombay High Court Cruelty | Non-Registration Of FIR Cannot Be Ground To Discredit Testimony Of Wife Seeking Divorce: Jharkhand High Court No Deception At Inception: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Revive Cheating Charges Against Borrower After One-Time Settlement Consumer Protection Act | Doctrine Of 'Caveat Emptor' Subservient To 'Caveat Venditor'; Auctioneer Liable For Sale Of Encumbered Vehicle: State Commission Section 127 CrPC | Past Compromise Not An Eternal Estoppel To Bar Wife From Seeking Enhancement In Maintenance: Orissa High Court States Can Prescribe Higher Qualifications Than UGC Norms, Additional Tests Promote Meritocracy: Punjab & Haryana High Court Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cancel Registered Sale Deed Or Adjudicate Title Disputes: Telangana High Court Principal Employer Cannot Abdicate Statutory Liability For Overtime Wages Of Contract Labour Despite Contractual Indemnity Clauses: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory For Invoking SC/ST Act Provisions If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked For Re-valuation Of Structures Once Compensation Dispute Is Adjudicated Under Section 64 RFCTLARR Act: Telangana High Court Revenue Village Naming | Government Must Ensure Names Do Not Reflect Any Person, Caste, Or Religion Under Policy Guidelines: Rajasthan High Court Section 138 NI Act | Complainant Must Prove Proprietorship Of Firm To Establish Status As 'Payee' Or 'Holder In Due Course': Himachal Pradesh High Court

If Relief Not Claimed in Pleadings – Cannot be Granted : SC

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


D.D:28-07-2022

Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that a relief for which no petition or prayer has been made should not be granted.

According to the Bench of Dinesh Maheshwari and Krishna Murari:

It is a fact that they never sought relief for the change of the child's surname to that of the first husband/son of respondents. It is well-established that relief not found in the pleadings cannot be granted. A miscarriage of justice would result if a court considered or granted a relief for which no prayer or pleading was made, depriving the respondent of an opportunity to oppose or resist such relief.

The court made this observation while overturning an Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling requiring a mother to change her child's surname and list her new husband as the stepfather.

In the Supreme Court appeal, the primary issue was whether the High Court had the authority to order the appellant to change the surname of her child, despite the fact that the respondent had not sought such relief in the lower court.

The Supreme Court noted at the outset that it is well-settled that if no reliefs are sought in the pleadings, they cannot be granted, and if a court considers or grants a relief for which no pleading or prayer was made, depriving the respondent of the opportunity to oppose it, it would result in a miscarriage of justice.

According to the bench, the High Court went beyond the pleadings by ordering the child's surname change, so it vacated the challenged order and partially granted the appeal.

The court reaffirmed that the mother, as the child's natural guardian, has the right to choose the child's surname and the right to place the child for adoption.

Akella Lalita

versus

Sri Konda Hanumantha Rao

Download Judgment

[gview file="http://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/28-Jul-2022-Akella-lalitha-vs-sri-konda-hanumantha.pdf"]

Latest Legal News