Unregistered Agreement Of Sale Entered Before Attachment Cannot Defeat Decree-Holder’s Claim: Andhra Pradesh High Court No Presumption That Joint Family Possesses Joint Property; Female Hindu Absolute Owner Of Property Purchased In Her Name: Allahabad High Court Age Determination Must Strictly Follow Hierarchy Of Documents Under JJ Act: Orissa High Court Acquits Man Of POCSO Charges Once 'C' Form Declarations Are Signed, Burden Shifts To Buyer To Prove Payment Of Outstanding Dues: Madras High Court Section 213 Succession Act No Bar To Eviction Suit If Claim Is Based On Landlord-Tenant Relationship, Not Title Under Will: Bombay High Court Meritorious Candidate Wrongfully Denied Appointment Entitled To Notional Seniority & Old Pension Scheme: J&K & Ladakh High Court 6-Year Delay In Propounding Will & Hostile Attesting Witness Constitute 'Grave Suspicious Circumstances': Delhi High Court Refuses Probate Section 319 CrPC Power Cannot Be Exercised Based On FIR Or Section 161 Statements: Allahabad High Court Quashes Summoning Of Unmarried Sisters Bail Proceedings Cannot Be Converted Into Recovery Proceedings; Court Can't Order Sale Of Accused's Property: Supreme Court Able-Bodied Husband Cannot Defeat Maintenance Claim By Projecting Income Below Minimum Wages: Delhi High Court Recording Section 313 CrPC Statement Before Cross-Examination Of Prosecution Witness Does Not Vitiate Trial: Karnataka High Court Murder By Unknown Assailants Is Not 'Accidental Death' Under Mukhymantri Kisan Bima Yojna: Allahabad High Court Section 311 CrPC | Court Not A Passive Bystander, Must Summon Material Witness If Essential For Just Decision: Rajasthan High Court

IF Bail Was Given Without Assigning Any Reason Bail Order Not Sustainable: Allahabad HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Recently, the Allahabad High Court ruled that if bail is granted to a similarly situated defendant for no apparent reason, then bail should not be granted based solely on the principle of equality.

The Bench of Justice Sameer Jain made these remarks in a murder case involving Manish's bail application. Manish and his parents are accused of dousing a woman in kerosene and then setting her on fire.

According to the victim's dying declaration, the accused and his family dragged the victim into their home on the day of the incident and then set her on fire.

On the other hand, the defence attorney for the defendant argued that the allegations stated in the FIR and the dying declaration are false, and that during the investigation it was determined that the allegations against the defendant and his family are false, and a final report was submitted.

In addition, it was asserted that under the SSP's direction, additional investigations were conducted and a charge sheet was filed against the accused.

In addition, it was argued that the dying declaration as a tutored one and the fact that the other co-accused have been granted bail by the Coordinate Bench are grounds for granting bail in this case.

After hearing the arguments, the court noted that there are specific allegations against the accused in the dying declaration, and it was also noted that the co-accused (one Mintu @ Amit) was granted bail by the coordinate Bench of the Court solely on the basis of the arguments advanced by his counsel, and the same was true for the other accused as well.

In this case, the court ruled that parity cannot be the sole criterion for granting bail and determining whether bail should be granted to other co-defendants.

The court also noted that the deceased made specific allegations against the applicant and the other defendants.

Accordingly, the court denied bail to the defendant and opined that in this instance, bail cannot be granted on the basis of equality.

D.D: 22 JUNE 2022

Manish Versus State of U.P.

Latest Legal News