Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court

Husband can't take wife's belongings/ jewellery without permission- Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court has stated that it is against the law for a husband to remove his wife's jewellery or other household items without her consent. No one may be permitted to impose their own laws, the Justice Amit Mahajan Bench further stated.

In a case where the woman claimed that her belongings were stolen while she was abroad, the Bench made these observations when denying anticipatory bail to the husband.

The husband was the subject of a FIR under section 380 IPC.

The petitioner (husband) is married to the complainant, and the FIR was filed against him as a result of a matrimonial conflict, according to the husband's attorney's argument before the court. He added that the residence in question is rented.

The petitioner further argued that the wife left the home of her own free will and that he was forced to give up the tenancy; as a result, the aforementioned items were taken out of the house.

However, the wife's attorney claimed that after spending three days at her parents' home, the complainant's wife returned to find the house locked and all of the furniture gone, prompting her to file the irate complaint. The wife couldn't be expelled and the house was the marriage home, it was further asserted.

The wife's attorney added that the wife bought domestic items such the TV, laptop, cash jewellery, etc., and that these items have nothing to do with the case currently underway between the parties and are connected to istridhan. The IO of the case informed the court that another witness had verified the landlord's claim that the spouse had taken possession of the household.

Even though the petitioner is the complainant's husband, the Bench noted from the outset that he is not legally permitted to remove the household belongings.

The husband has not cooperated with the investigation, and the articles have not yet been found, the court further stated.

The court declined to grant anticipatory bail because it believed the accusations made against the husband were serious.

Akshay Dhingra vs NCT of Delhi 

Latest Legal News