Limitation For Executing Partition Decree Not Suspended Till Engrossment; Right To Seek Engrossment Subsists During 12-Year Execution Period: Allahabad HC Unilateral Revocation Of Registered Gift Deed Through Sub-Registrar Is Void, Donor Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mediation Cannot Be Forced Upon Unwilling Party In Civil Suits; Consent Of Both Sides Essential: Bombay High Court Unmarried Daughter Not Entitled To Freedom Fighter Pension If Gainfully Employed At Time Of Father's Death: Calcutta High Court Section 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Denied For Lack Of Formal Divorce From First Marriage: Delhi High Court ONGC Cannot Demand Security From Award Holder After Giving ‘No Objection’ To Withdrawal Of Deposited Amount: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sedative Drugs Like Tramadol Impact Mental Fitness Of Declarant; Bombay High Court Acquits Man Relying On Doubtful Dying Declarations Postal Tracking Report Showing 'Refusal' Not Conclusive Proof Of Service If Denied On Oath: Delhi High Court Encroachments Near Military Installations Pose National Security Threat; Remove Illegal Constructions Within Three Months: Rajasthan High Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs State To Decide On Legality Of Charging Fees For Downloading FIRs From 'SAANJH' Portal Wife’s Educational Qualifications No Bar To Seeking Maintenance If Actual Employment Is Not Proven: Orissa High Court Mere Telephonic Contact Without Substance Of Conversation Cannot Establish Criminal Conspiracy: Madhya Pradesh High Court Serious Allegations Like HIV/AIDS Imputations Require Corroboration, Cannot Rest Solely On Unsubstantiated Testimony: Karnataka High Court Family Court Cannot Refuse Mutual Consent Divorce Merely Because Parties Are Living Separately 'Without Valid Reason': Kerala High Court Collective Attempts By Advocates To Overbear Presiding Officer Not Protected Professional Conduct: Madras High Court Dismisses Quash Petitions No Legal Evidence Required To Forward A Person To Trial? Rajasthan HC Slams Police For Implicating Accused In NDPS Case Solely On Co-Accused's Statement Accused Must Be Physically Present In Court To Furnish Bonds Under Section 91 BNSS: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Homebuyer Forced to Run from Pillar to Post After Life Savings Sunk into Unfinished Project - Delhi High Court Ordered to refund the Entire Payment With Interest

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a significant ruling, addressed the plight of a homebuyer who had invested his life savings into a housing project by National Buildings Construction Corporation (NBCC) only to face years of uncertainty and legal battles due to the non-completion and structural defects of the property. The court emphasized, "A helpless homebuyer has no other option but to knock door after door hoping against hope that he would be able to get his money back."

Legal Point of the Judgement: The court addressed the issue of non-delivery of possession of a flat by NBCC despite full payment. It also dismissed a contempt petition against NBCC for alleged non-compliance with court orders to provide temporary compensation to the petitioner.

Facts and Issues Arising: The petitioner, a retired government employee, had booked a flat in NBCC Green View Apartments in 2012. Despite completing payments by 2017, he was neither given possession of the flat nor provided a suitable alternative or refund. The buildings in the project were later found to have structural defects necessitating evacuation, further complicating the petitioner’s circumstances.

Non-Delivery and Compensation: The court noted the extreme hardship faced by the petitioner, who was compelled to seek temporary accommodations while fighting for his rights. Justice Subramonium Prasad remarked, "Such a person faces financial crunch to ensure proper education to his children and such a situation he has no other option but to knock on the doors of various forums hoping to get relief."

Forum Shopping: Addressing the respondent’s accusation of forum shopping against the petitioner, the court found that the petitioner's actions stemmed from desperation and a dire need for relief, rather than manipulative legal strategizing.

State’s Duty and Fair Treatment: The judgment highlighted the role of state-run enterprises like NBCC in acting fairly and responsibly, underlining that such bodies should not just aim to defend their actions legally but also ensure justice and fair treatment to individuals affected by their operations.

Compensation for Mental Agony: Recognizing the mental stress and turmoil endured by the petitioner, the court ordered additional compensation. "In view of the fact that the Petitioner has been forced to shift accommodation and fend for himself in the last seven years and has been put to extreme mental agony, this Court is inclined to direct the NBCC to pay a sum of Rs.5 lakh to the Petitioner," Justice Prasad declared.

Decision of the Court: The High Court allowed the writ petition, directing NBCC to refund the entire payment made by the petitioner with an interest rate of 12% from January 30, 2021, till the date of the order, along with a compensation of Rs. 5 lakhs for mental agony. The contempt petition regarding non-compliance of earlier court orders by NBCC was dismissed, noting NBCC's efforts in complying with the directives.

Date of Decision: May 8, 2024

Sanjay Raghunath Piplani And Anr. vs. National Buildings Construction Corporation Delhi And Anr.

Latest Legal News