Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

Homebuyer Forced to Run from Pillar to Post After Life Savings Sunk into Unfinished Project - Delhi High Court Ordered to refund the Entire Payment With Interest

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a significant ruling, addressed the plight of a homebuyer who had invested his life savings into a housing project by National Buildings Construction Corporation (NBCC) only to face years of uncertainty and legal battles due to the non-completion and structural defects of the property. The court emphasized, "A helpless homebuyer has no other option but to knock door after door hoping against hope that he would be able to get his money back."

Legal Point of the Judgement: The court addressed the issue of non-delivery of possession of a flat by NBCC despite full payment. It also dismissed a contempt petition against NBCC for alleged non-compliance with court orders to provide temporary compensation to the petitioner.

Facts and Issues Arising: The petitioner, a retired government employee, had booked a flat in NBCC Green View Apartments in 2012. Despite completing payments by 2017, he was neither given possession of the flat nor provided a suitable alternative or refund. The buildings in the project were later found to have structural defects necessitating evacuation, further complicating the petitioner’s circumstances.

Non-Delivery and Compensation: The court noted the extreme hardship faced by the petitioner, who was compelled to seek temporary accommodations while fighting for his rights. Justice Subramonium Prasad remarked, "Such a person faces financial crunch to ensure proper education to his children and such a situation he has no other option but to knock on the doors of various forums hoping to get relief."

Forum Shopping: Addressing the respondent’s accusation of forum shopping against the petitioner, the court found that the petitioner's actions stemmed from desperation and a dire need for relief, rather than manipulative legal strategizing.

State’s Duty and Fair Treatment: The judgment highlighted the role of state-run enterprises like NBCC in acting fairly and responsibly, underlining that such bodies should not just aim to defend their actions legally but also ensure justice and fair treatment to individuals affected by their operations.

Compensation for Mental Agony: Recognizing the mental stress and turmoil endured by the petitioner, the court ordered additional compensation. "In view of the fact that the Petitioner has been forced to shift accommodation and fend for himself in the last seven years and has been put to extreme mental agony, this Court is inclined to direct the NBCC to pay a sum of Rs.5 lakh to the Petitioner," Justice Prasad declared.

Decision of the Court: The High Court allowed the writ petition, directing NBCC to refund the entire payment made by the petitioner with an interest rate of 12% from January 30, 2021, till the date of the order, along with a compensation of Rs. 5 lakhs for mental agony. The contempt petition regarding non-compliance of earlier court orders by NBCC was dismissed, noting NBCC's efforts in complying with the directives.

Date of Decision: May 8, 2024

Sanjay Raghunath Piplani And Anr. vs. National Buildings Construction Corporation Delhi And Anr.

Similar News