Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Homebuyer Forced to Run from Pillar to Post After Life Savings Sunk into Unfinished Project - Delhi High Court Ordered to refund the Entire Payment With Interest

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a significant ruling, addressed the plight of a homebuyer who had invested his life savings into a housing project by National Buildings Construction Corporation (NBCC) only to face years of uncertainty and legal battles due to the non-completion and structural defects of the property. The court emphasized, "A helpless homebuyer has no other option but to knock door after door hoping against hope that he would be able to get his money back."

Legal Point of the Judgement: The court addressed the issue of non-delivery of possession of a flat by NBCC despite full payment. It also dismissed a contempt petition against NBCC for alleged non-compliance with court orders to provide temporary compensation to the petitioner.

Facts and Issues Arising: The petitioner, a retired government employee, had booked a flat in NBCC Green View Apartments in 2012. Despite completing payments by 2017, he was neither given possession of the flat nor provided a suitable alternative or refund. The buildings in the project were later found to have structural defects necessitating evacuation, further complicating the petitioner’s circumstances.

Non-Delivery and Compensation: The court noted the extreme hardship faced by the petitioner, who was compelled to seek temporary accommodations while fighting for his rights. Justice Subramonium Prasad remarked, "Such a person faces financial crunch to ensure proper education to his children and such a situation he has no other option but to knock on the doors of various forums hoping to get relief."

Forum Shopping: Addressing the respondent’s accusation of forum shopping against the petitioner, the court found that the petitioner's actions stemmed from desperation and a dire need for relief, rather than manipulative legal strategizing.

State’s Duty and Fair Treatment: The judgment highlighted the role of state-run enterprises like NBCC in acting fairly and responsibly, underlining that such bodies should not just aim to defend their actions legally but also ensure justice and fair treatment to individuals affected by their operations.

Compensation for Mental Agony: Recognizing the mental stress and turmoil endured by the petitioner, the court ordered additional compensation. "In view of the fact that the Petitioner has been forced to shift accommodation and fend for himself in the last seven years and has been put to extreme mental agony, this Court is inclined to direct the NBCC to pay a sum of Rs.5 lakh to the Petitioner," Justice Prasad declared.

Decision of the Court: The High Court allowed the writ petition, directing NBCC to refund the entire payment made by the petitioner with an interest rate of 12% from January 30, 2021, till the date of the order, along with a compensation of Rs. 5 lakhs for mental agony. The contempt petition regarding non-compliance of earlier court orders by NBCC was dismissed, noting NBCC's efforts in complying with the directives.

Date of Decision: May 8, 2024

Sanjay Raghunath Piplani And Anr. vs. National Buildings Construction Corporation Delhi And Anr.

Latest Legal News