Supreme Court Holds Allottees Who Elected RERA Remedy Cannot Subsequently Seek Interim Relief Under Section 9 Arbitration Act Lodging FIR Does Not Amount To Instigation: Supreme Court Quashes Section 306 IPC Case Against In-Laws Over Husband's Suicide Vigilant Citizen Deserves Acknowledgment: Supreme Court Sets Strict Timelines For 20-Year-Old Subway Project, Lauds Litigant's Relentless Legal Battle Lawyer Cannot Disclose Privileged Information On TV Even If Client Becomes Adversary: Supreme Court Upholds Suspension Of Advocate Rizwan Siddique, Slaps ₹5 Lakh Cost On Both Parties Supreme Court Modifies 3-Year Bar Practice Rule; Orders 1-Year Practice Coupled With 2-Year Academy Training & Clerkship Model Made A Scapegoat Under Pressure Of Public Outcry: Delhi High Court Acquits Man Sentenced To Life In POCSO Case Doctrine Of Lis Pendens Applies To Court Auctions; Purchaser Bound By Outcome Of Pending Specific Performance Suit: Allahabad High Court Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Section 65B Evidence Act Objection Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal Two-Month Time Limit To File Evidence Under Rule 45 Of Trade Marks Rules 2017 Is Mandatory; Non-Compliance Results In Deemed Abandonment: Madras High Court SEBI Act | Special Law Overrides General Law': Bombay High Court Quashes Police FIR Against Ex-Axis Mutual Fund Chief Dealer In Front-Running Case 'Truth Cannot Be Sacrificed At The Altar Of Rigid Timelines': Calcutta High Court Upholds Section 311 CrPC Powers At Any Stage For Just Decision 'A Dispute Does Not Cease To Be Criminal Merely Because It Involves Commercial Transaction': Chhattisgarh High Court Refuses To Quash Cheating FIR In ₹4.39 Cr Land Deal Holding In Designated Centres Only Way If Foreigner Cannot Be Expelled: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail To Declared Foreigner Who Illegally Re-Entered India Madras High Court Issues Guidelines Against Police Harassment Under Guise Of Enquiry, Mandates Written Summons Under Section 179 BNSS Grave Ramifications On Rights': Punjab & Haryana High Court Mandates Strict Compliance Of Section 82 CrPC Before Declaring Accused As Proclaimed Person 'Interacting With Father Benefits Child's Well-Being': Kerala High Court Grants Virtual Access To Father After Mother Takes Child Abroad Violating Restraint Order Agreement In Family Member’s Name Cannot Shield Occupants Under Section 53-A TP Act': Uttarakhand High Court Upholds Eviction Of Licensees Not Filling A Lacuna: Subsequent Forensic Report From Criminal Case Can Be Produced As Additional Evidence In Civil Suit: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Nomination In FIR Not Enough For Vicarious Liability: Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused Under Section 149 IPC Demanding Separations From Depending In-Laws Constitute Mental Cruelty: Calcutta High Court Upholds Divorce Human Memory Not Photographic: Allahabad High Court Upholds Murder Conviction, Reiterates 'Falsus In Uno' Maxim Has No Application In India Litigant Claiming To Be Sub-Tenant Before Revenue Authorities Cannot Set Up Plea Of Adverse Possession In Civil Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Civil Death": Orissa High Court Rules Blacklisting Of Contractor Without Specific Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice Delay Irrespective Of Number Of Years Ought To Be Condoned In Land Acquisition Matters': Punjab & Haryana High Court Condones 3953 Days Delay 'Notary Cannot Act As Marriage Officer': Madhya Pradesh High Court Accepts Notary's Apology With ₹2 Lakh Welfare Cost, Directs Display Board Against Notarizing Marriages

Homebuyer Forced to Run from Pillar to Post After Life Savings Sunk into Unfinished Project - Delhi High Court Ordered to refund the Entire Payment With Interest

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a significant ruling, addressed the plight of a homebuyer who had invested his life savings into a housing project by National Buildings Construction Corporation (NBCC) only to face years of uncertainty and legal battles due to the non-completion and structural defects of the property. The court emphasized, "A helpless homebuyer has no other option but to knock door after door hoping against hope that he would be able to get his money back."

Legal Point of the Judgement: The court addressed the issue of non-delivery of possession of a flat by NBCC despite full payment. It also dismissed a contempt petition against NBCC for alleged non-compliance with court orders to provide temporary compensation to the petitioner.

Facts and Issues Arising: The petitioner, a retired government employee, had booked a flat in NBCC Green View Apartments in 2012. Despite completing payments by 2017, he was neither given possession of the flat nor provided a suitable alternative or refund. The buildings in the project were later found to have structural defects necessitating evacuation, further complicating the petitioner’s circumstances.

Non-Delivery and Compensation: The court noted the extreme hardship faced by the petitioner, who was compelled to seek temporary accommodations while fighting for his rights. Justice Subramonium Prasad remarked, "Such a person faces financial crunch to ensure proper education to his children and such a situation he has no other option but to knock on the doors of various forums hoping to get relief."

Forum Shopping: Addressing the respondent’s accusation of forum shopping against the petitioner, the court found that the petitioner's actions stemmed from desperation and a dire need for relief, rather than manipulative legal strategizing.

State’s Duty and Fair Treatment: The judgment highlighted the role of state-run enterprises like NBCC in acting fairly and responsibly, underlining that such bodies should not just aim to defend their actions legally but also ensure justice and fair treatment to individuals affected by their operations.

Compensation for Mental Agony: Recognizing the mental stress and turmoil endured by the petitioner, the court ordered additional compensation. "In view of the fact that the Petitioner has been forced to shift accommodation and fend for himself in the last seven years and has been put to extreme mental agony, this Court is inclined to direct the NBCC to pay a sum of Rs.5 lakh to the Petitioner," Justice Prasad declared.

Decision of the Court: The High Court allowed the writ petition, directing NBCC to refund the entire payment made by the petitioner with an interest rate of 12% from January 30, 2021, till the date of the order, along with a compensation of Rs. 5 lakhs for mental agony. The contempt petition regarding non-compliance of earlier court orders by NBCC was dismissed, noting NBCC's efforts in complying with the directives.

Date of Decision: May 8, 2024

Sanjay Raghunath Piplani And Anr. vs. National Buildings Construction Corporation Delhi And Anr.

Latest Legal News