Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

High Court Upholds Medical Council's Verdict: No Negligence in Cardiologist's Treatment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Delhi has affirmed the decision of the Delhi Medical Council, absolving a senior cardiologist of alleged medical negligence in the treatment of a 78-year-old patient.

Justice Subramonium Prasad, presiding over the matter, stated that "the prescription reflects the casual approach of Dr. B.B. Chanana, which is not expected of an ordinary reasonable prudent doctor," yet he emphasized that this did not amount to medical negligence warranting punitive action. The decision underlines the court's reliance on the expertise of the medical disciplinary committee when adjudicating such specialized matters.

The case arose from a complaint lodged by the son of a deceased patient, alleging that Dr. B.B. Chanana's failure to conduct necessary tests on the initial visit led to his father's untimely death. The Delhi Medical Council, however, found that the treatment prescribed was appropriate given the patient's condition during the first visit and did not constitute medical negligence.

The Court's judgment reiterated the principle that medical professionals cannot be held liable for negligence if their actions align with accepted medical practices of the time. "So long as a Doctor follows a practice acceptable under the Medical Practice on that day, he cannot be held liable for negligence," Justice Prasad clarified.

While the Court acknowledged shortcomings in the cardiologist's documentation, it concurred with the Council's recommendation for Dr. Chanana to exercise greater diligence in the future.

Advocates representing the petitioner and the respondents engaged in thorough discussions, but the ruling ultimately favored the established medical opinion, dismissing the writ petition.

This judgment reinforces the judicial stance that expert bodies' decisions in technical fields like medical practice are to be respected unless proven 'perverse or unconscionable.'

The legal fraternity and medical councils across the country are closely observing the repercussions of this judgment for future cases of alleged medical negligence.

Date of Decision: 06 November, 2023

 BALJIT SINGH VS DELHI MEDICAL COUNCIL & ANR

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Del-06-Nov-2023-Baljit-Singh-Vs-Delhi-Medical-Council.pdf"]

Latest Legal News