MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

High Court Upholds Medical Council's Verdict: No Negligence in Cardiologist's Treatment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Delhi has affirmed the decision of the Delhi Medical Council, absolving a senior cardiologist of alleged medical negligence in the treatment of a 78-year-old patient.

Justice Subramonium Prasad, presiding over the matter, stated that "the prescription reflects the casual approach of Dr. B.B. Chanana, which is not expected of an ordinary reasonable prudent doctor," yet he emphasized that this did not amount to medical negligence warranting punitive action. The decision underlines the court's reliance on the expertise of the medical disciplinary committee when adjudicating such specialized matters.

The case arose from a complaint lodged by the son of a deceased patient, alleging that Dr. B.B. Chanana's failure to conduct necessary tests on the initial visit led to his father's untimely death. The Delhi Medical Council, however, found that the treatment prescribed was appropriate given the patient's condition during the first visit and did not constitute medical negligence.

The Court's judgment reiterated the principle that medical professionals cannot be held liable for negligence if their actions align with accepted medical practices of the time. "So long as a Doctor follows a practice acceptable under the Medical Practice on that day, he cannot be held liable for negligence," Justice Prasad clarified.

While the Court acknowledged shortcomings in the cardiologist's documentation, it concurred with the Council's recommendation for Dr. Chanana to exercise greater diligence in the future.

Advocates representing the petitioner and the respondents engaged in thorough discussions, but the ruling ultimately favored the established medical opinion, dismissing the writ petition.

This judgment reinforces the judicial stance that expert bodies' decisions in technical fields like medical practice are to be respected unless proven 'perverse or unconscionable.'

The legal fraternity and medical councils across the country are closely observing the repercussions of this judgment for future cases of alleged medical negligence.

Date of Decision: 06 November, 2023

 BALJIT SINGH VS DELHI MEDICAL COUNCIL & ANR

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Del-06-Nov-2023-Baljit-Singh-Vs-Delhi-Medical-Council.pdf"]

Latest Legal News