Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

High Court Upholds Medical Council's Verdict: No Negligence in Cardiologist's Treatment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Delhi has affirmed the decision of the Delhi Medical Council, absolving a senior cardiologist of alleged medical negligence in the treatment of a 78-year-old patient.

Justice Subramonium Prasad, presiding over the matter, stated that "the prescription reflects the casual approach of Dr. B.B. Chanana, which is not expected of an ordinary reasonable prudent doctor," yet he emphasized that this did not amount to medical negligence warranting punitive action. The decision underlines the court's reliance on the expertise of the medical disciplinary committee when adjudicating such specialized matters.

The case arose from a complaint lodged by the son of a deceased patient, alleging that Dr. B.B. Chanana's failure to conduct necessary tests on the initial visit led to his father's untimely death. The Delhi Medical Council, however, found that the treatment prescribed was appropriate given the patient's condition during the first visit and did not constitute medical negligence.

The Court's judgment reiterated the principle that medical professionals cannot be held liable for negligence if their actions align with accepted medical practices of the time. "So long as a Doctor follows a practice acceptable under the Medical Practice on that day, he cannot be held liable for negligence," Justice Prasad clarified.

While the Court acknowledged shortcomings in the cardiologist's documentation, it concurred with the Council's recommendation for Dr. Chanana to exercise greater diligence in the future.

Advocates representing the petitioner and the respondents engaged in thorough discussions, but the ruling ultimately favored the established medical opinion, dismissing the writ petition.

This judgment reinforces the judicial stance that expert bodies' decisions in technical fields like medical practice are to be respected unless proven 'perverse or unconscionable.'

The legal fraternity and medical councils across the country are closely observing the repercussions of this judgment for future cases of alleged medical negligence.

Date of Decision: 06 November, 2023

 BALJIT SINGH VS DELHI MEDICAL COUNCIL & ANR

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Del-06-Nov-2023-Baljit-Singh-Vs-Delhi-Medical-Council.pdf"]

Latest Legal News