Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

High Court Upholds MDNIY Director’s Appointment: “Respondent Met Essential Criteria”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark ruling on 7th November 2023, the Delhi High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the appointment of the Director of the Morarji Desai National Institute of Yoga (MDNIY). The Court observed that “the respondent met the essential criteria at the time of appointment,” thus legitimizing the tenure of Dr. Ishwarappa Veerbhadrappa Basavaraddi as the head of the prestigious institution.

The PIL, filed by Dr. Ajay Pal, questioned the qualifications and the legitimacy of the respondent’s long-standing directorship, alleging a lack of requisite qualifications and a fabricated employment record. However, the Court, led by the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, found that the accusations were unsupported by evidence. The Court stated, “It has been demonstrated that Respondent No. 3 met the prescribed criteria at the relevant times, and there has been a substantial compliance with due process in his appointment.”

During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Mobin Akhtar, argued that the respondent had secured his position through forged and fabricated academic credentials. In contrast, counsel for the respondents, including Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC, and Mr. R.M. Bagai, defended the legitimacy of the appointment process, affirming that the respondent had served with distinction and met all recruitment norms.

The Court meticulously reviewed the service records and educational qualifications of the respondent and concluded that the “presumption of regularity in public appointments” was not dislodged. This ruling comes after an in-depth examination of Respondent No. 3’s service records and a thorough evaluation of the policies surrounding the directorial tenure.

Furthermore, the High Court dismissed the petitioner’s claims about the respondent’s alleged inefficacy in his role as Director and noted that such assessments fall outside the Court’s purview under Article 226.

The dismissal of the petition reaffirms the integrity of the appointment procedures and the credentials of Dr. Basavaraddi, who retired on June 30, 2023. The decision has been welcomed by the Union Ministry of AYUSH and the MDNIY, emphasizing the Court’s commitment to uphold the lawful appointments to public offices.

Date of Decision: 07 November, 2023

AJAY PAL VS  UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/07-Nov-2023-Dr.Ajaypal-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News