MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

High Court Upholds MDNIY Director’s Appointment: “Respondent Met Essential Criteria”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark ruling on 7th November 2023, the Delhi High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the appointment of the Director of the Morarji Desai National Institute of Yoga (MDNIY). The Court observed that “the respondent met the essential criteria at the time of appointment,” thus legitimizing the tenure of Dr. Ishwarappa Veerbhadrappa Basavaraddi as the head of the prestigious institution.

The PIL, filed by Dr. Ajay Pal, questioned the qualifications and the legitimacy of the respondent’s long-standing directorship, alleging a lack of requisite qualifications and a fabricated employment record. However, the Court, led by the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, found that the accusations were unsupported by evidence. The Court stated, “It has been demonstrated that Respondent No. 3 met the prescribed criteria at the relevant times, and there has been a substantial compliance with due process in his appointment.”

During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Mobin Akhtar, argued that the respondent had secured his position through forged and fabricated academic credentials. In contrast, counsel for the respondents, including Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC, and Mr. R.M. Bagai, defended the legitimacy of the appointment process, affirming that the respondent had served with distinction and met all recruitment norms.

The Court meticulously reviewed the service records and educational qualifications of the respondent and concluded that the “presumption of regularity in public appointments” was not dislodged. This ruling comes after an in-depth examination of Respondent No. 3’s service records and a thorough evaluation of the policies surrounding the directorial tenure.

Furthermore, the High Court dismissed the petitioner’s claims about the respondent’s alleged inefficacy in his role as Director and noted that such assessments fall outside the Court’s purview under Article 226.

The dismissal of the petition reaffirms the integrity of the appointment procedures and the credentials of Dr. Basavaraddi, who retired on June 30, 2023. The decision has been welcomed by the Union Ministry of AYUSH and the MDNIY, emphasizing the Court’s commitment to uphold the lawful appointments to public offices.

Date of Decision: 07 November, 2023

AJAY PAL VS  UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/07-Nov-2023-Dr.Ajaypal-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News