Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     Smell of Alcohol in Post-Mortem Insufficient to Establish Intoxication: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Liability of Insurance Company in Motor Accident Case    |     No Grounds for Transfer: Free Bus Fare for Women in Telangana Reduces Travel Burden: Telangana High Court Rejects Wife's Petition to Transfer Divorce Case    |     Mechanical Referrals Invalid: "Deputy Registrar Must Apply Judicial Mind: Allahabad HC Quashes Deputy Registrar's Order in Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Election Dispute    |    

High Court Upholds Attachment of Land in Disputed Sale: Apprehension of Breach of Peace as Justifiable Ground

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court today dismissed a petition seeking to quash proceedings related to a contentious land dispute in Kurukshetra. The Court upheld the orders passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Pehowa, and the Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, underlining the importance of maintaining peace in the face of property disputes.

Justice Deepak Gupta, presiding over the case, observed, "In these circumstances, ld. SDM, Ismailabad was not at fault in coming to the conclusion that there was apprehension of breach of peace and tranquility, in respect of possession of the disputed land and so, rightly attached the land."

The dispute revolved around a piece of land sold by petitioner Harjinder Singh to Lakhvinder Kaur (respondent No.3), who further sold it to Balwinder Kaur (respondent No.2). The petitioner challenged the validity of these transactions, alleging fraud and incorrect possession transfer.

The Court's decision comes after a detailed analysis of Sections 145 & 146 of the Criminal Procedure Code, with specific reference to the Supreme Court judgment in Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, 2013. The ruling emphasizes the Magistrate's role in preventing breaches of peace in land disputes and the power to attach disputed property in such cases.

While dismissing the petition, the Court also noted the initiation of partition proceedings, indicating a complex dispute over the actual possession of specific land parcels. The ruling also addressed an application to implead two daughters-in-law of the petitioner, who acquired parts of the disputed land during the proceedings, but this was dismissed as an apparent attempt to delay proceedings.

The decision highlights the judiciary's careful balancing act between legal rights and maintaining public order, setting a precedent for similar property disputes. The dismissal of the petition has led to the vacation of the stay order previously granted, bringing a new phase in this long-standing land dispute.

Date of Decision: 16 December 2023                                                      

HARJINDER SINGH  VS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

 

Similar News