Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

High Court Upholds Attachment of Land in Disputed Sale: Apprehension of Breach of Peace as Justifiable Ground

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court today dismissed a petition seeking to quash proceedings related to a contentious land dispute in Kurukshetra. The Court upheld the orders passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Pehowa, and the Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, underlining the importance of maintaining peace in the face of property disputes.

Justice Deepak Gupta, presiding over the case, observed, "In these circumstances, ld. SDM, Ismailabad was not at fault in coming to the conclusion that there was apprehension of breach of peace and tranquility, in respect of possession of the disputed land and so, rightly attached the land."

The dispute revolved around a piece of land sold by petitioner Harjinder Singh to Lakhvinder Kaur (respondent No.3), who further sold it to Balwinder Kaur (respondent No.2). The petitioner challenged the validity of these transactions, alleging fraud and incorrect possession transfer.

The Court's decision comes after a detailed analysis of Sections 145 & 146 of the Criminal Procedure Code, with specific reference to the Supreme Court judgment in Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, 2013. The ruling emphasizes the Magistrate's role in preventing breaches of peace in land disputes and the power to attach disputed property in such cases.

While dismissing the petition, the Court also noted the initiation of partition proceedings, indicating a complex dispute over the actual possession of specific land parcels. The ruling also addressed an application to implead two daughters-in-law of the petitioner, who acquired parts of the disputed land during the proceedings, but this was dismissed as an apparent attempt to delay proceedings.

The decision highlights the judiciary's careful balancing act between legal rights and maintaining public order, setting a precedent for similar property disputes. The dismissal of the petition has led to the vacation of the stay order previously granted, bringing a new phase in this long-standing land dispute.

Date of Decision: 16 December 2023                                                      

HARJINDER SINGH  VS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News