Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

High Court Upholds Attachment of Land in Disputed Sale: Apprehension of Breach of Peace as Justifiable Ground

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court today dismissed a petition seeking to quash proceedings related to a contentious land dispute in Kurukshetra. The Court upheld the orders passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Pehowa, and the Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, underlining the importance of maintaining peace in the face of property disputes.

Justice Deepak Gupta, presiding over the case, observed, "In these circumstances, ld. SDM, Ismailabad was not at fault in coming to the conclusion that there was apprehension of breach of peace and tranquility, in respect of possession of the disputed land and so, rightly attached the land."

The dispute revolved around a piece of land sold by petitioner Harjinder Singh to Lakhvinder Kaur (respondent No.3), who further sold it to Balwinder Kaur (respondent No.2). The petitioner challenged the validity of these transactions, alleging fraud and incorrect possession transfer.

The Court's decision comes after a detailed analysis of Sections 145 & 146 of the Criminal Procedure Code, with specific reference to the Supreme Court judgment in Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, 2013. The ruling emphasizes the Magistrate's role in preventing breaches of peace in land disputes and the power to attach disputed property in such cases.

While dismissing the petition, the Court also noted the initiation of partition proceedings, indicating a complex dispute over the actual possession of specific land parcels. The ruling also addressed an application to implead two daughters-in-law of the petitioner, who acquired parts of the disputed land during the proceedings, but this was dismissed as an apparent attempt to delay proceedings.

The decision highlights the judiciary's careful balancing act between legal rights and maintaining public order, setting a precedent for similar property disputes. The dismissal of the petition has led to the vacation of the stay order previously granted, bringing a new phase in this long-standing land dispute.

Date of Decision: 16 December 2023                                                      

HARJINDER SINGH  VS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News