Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

High Court Settles for Justice over Procedural Technicalities: The Ultimate Aim, Objective, and Goal of a Legal System is to Reconcile Social Conflicts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement , the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh underscored the essence of the legal system in resolving disputes, leading to the quashing of a proclamation order against the petitioners in the case CRM-M-55589-2023. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar highlighted the court’s philosophy by stating, “The ultimate aim, objective, and goal of a legal system is to reconcile social conflicts.”

The petitioners, associated with Bookmark Education Services Pvt. Ltd., were previously declared as proclaimed persons in a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. However, after entering into an amicable settlement with the complainant, the court acknowledged that the need for procedural strictness was outweighed by the achieved reconciliation.

This decision was reinforced by previous judgments cited by the court, emphasizing that once the substantive offence has been settled, the procedural order becomes inconsequential. The court’s approach, advocating for settlements and the withdrawal of complaints to ease the legal burden, has been lauded as a progressive step towards a more harmonious legal process.

Legal experts and the involved parties have welcomed the court’s decision, which not only resolved the immediate dispute but also set a precedent for future cases where settlements are reached. Advocates Jatin Bansal and Kapil K. Gupta, representing the petitioners and the respondent respectively, have expressed satisfaction with the court’s fair and just resolution. The State’s representative, Mr. Manish Bansal, acknowledged the court’s decision, further solidifying the ruling’s standing.

The High Court’s decision is a testament to the judiciary’s role in not just adjudicating but also facilitating the resolution of disputes, underscoring the belief that the law ultimately serves to restore and maintain societal harmony.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

Bookmark Education Services Pvt. Ltd. and another VS State of U.T. Chandigarh and another       

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/PH-06-Nov-23-Bookmark_Education_Services_Pvt_vs_State_Of_Ut_Chandigarh_And_Anr.pdf"]

Latest Legal News