Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

High Court Settles for Justice over Procedural Technicalities: The Ultimate Aim, Objective, and Goal of a Legal System is to Reconcile Social Conflicts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement , the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh underscored the essence of the legal system in resolving disputes, leading to the quashing of a proclamation order against the petitioners in the case CRM-M-55589-2023. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar highlighted the court’s philosophy by stating, “The ultimate aim, objective, and goal of a legal system is to reconcile social conflicts.”

The petitioners, associated with Bookmark Education Services Pvt. Ltd., were previously declared as proclaimed persons in a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. However, after entering into an amicable settlement with the complainant, the court acknowledged that the need for procedural strictness was outweighed by the achieved reconciliation.

This decision was reinforced by previous judgments cited by the court, emphasizing that once the substantive offence has been settled, the procedural order becomes inconsequential. The court’s approach, advocating for settlements and the withdrawal of complaints to ease the legal burden, has been lauded as a progressive step towards a more harmonious legal process.

Legal experts and the involved parties have welcomed the court’s decision, which not only resolved the immediate dispute but also set a precedent for future cases where settlements are reached. Advocates Jatin Bansal and Kapil K. Gupta, representing the petitioners and the respondent respectively, have expressed satisfaction with the court’s fair and just resolution. The State’s representative, Mr. Manish Bansal, acknowledged the court’s decision, further solidifying the ruling’s standing.

The High Court’s decision is a testament to the judiciary’s role in not just adjudicating but also facilitating the resolution of disputes, underscoring the belief that the law ultimately serves to restore and maintain societal harmony.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

Bookmark Education Services Pvt. Ltd. and another VS State of U.T. Chandigarh and another       

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/PH-06-Nov-23-Bookmark_Education_Services_Pvt_vs_State_Of_Ut_Chandigarh_And_Anr.pdf"]

Latest Legal News