MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

High Court Settles for Justice over Procedural Technicalities: The Ultimate Aim, Objective, and Goal of a Legal System is to Reconcile Social Conflicts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement , the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh underscored the essence of the legal system in resolving disputes, leading to the quashing of a proclamation order against the petitioners in the case CRM-M-55589-2023. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar highlighted the court’s philosophy by stating, “The ultimate aim, objective, and goal of a legal system is to reconcile social conflicts.”

The petitioners, associated with Bookmark Education Services Pvt. Ltd., were previously declared as proclaimed persons in a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. However, after entering into an amicable settlement with the complainant, the court acknowledged that the need for procedural strictness was outweighed by the achieved reconciliation.

This decision was reinforced by previous judgments cited by the court, emphasizing that once the substantive offence has been settled, the procedural order becomes inconsequential. The court’s approach, advocating for settlements and the withdrawal of complaints to ease the legal burden, has been lauded as a progressive step towards a more harmonious legal process.

Legal experts and the involved parties have welcomed the court’s decision, which not only resolved the immediate dispute but also set a precedent for future cases where settlements are reached. Advocates Jatin Bansal and Kapil K. Gupta, representing the petitioners and the respondent respectively, have expressed satisfaction with the court’s fair and just resolution. The State’s representative, Mr. Manish Bansal, acknowledged the court’s decision, further solidifying the ruling’s standing.

The High Court’s decision is a testament to the judiciary’s role in not just adjudicating but also facilitating the resolution of disputes, underscoring the belief that the law ultimately serves to restore and maintain societal harmony.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

Bookmark Education Services Pvt. Ltd. and another VS State of U.T. Chandigarh and another       

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/PH-06-Nov-23-Bookmark_Education_Services_Pvt_vs_State_Of_Ut_Chandigarh_And_Anr.pdf"]

Latest Legal News