Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

High Court Settles for Justice over Procedural Technicalities: The Ultimate Aim, Objective, and Goal of a Legal System is to Reconcile Social Conflicts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement , the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh underscored the essence of the legal system in resolving disputes, leading to the quashing of a proclamation order against the petitioners in the case CRM-M-55589-2023. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar highlighted the court’s philosophy by stating, “The ultimate aim, objective, and goal of a legal system is to reconcile social conflicts.”

The petitioners, associated with Bookmark Education Services Pvt. Ltd., were previously declared as proclaimed persons in a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. However, after entering into an amicable settlement with the complainant, the court acknowledged that the need for procedural strictness was outweighed by the achieved reconciliation.

This decision was reinforced by previous judgments cited by the court, emphasizing that once the substantive offence has been settled, the procedural order becomes inconsequential. The court’s approach, advocating for settlements and the withdrawal of complaints to ease the legal burden, has been lauded as a progressive step towards a more harmonious legal process.

Legal experts and the involved parties have welcomed the court’s decision, which not only resolved the immediate dispute but also set a precedent for future cases where settlements are reached. Advocates Jatin Bansal and Kapil K. Gupta, representing the petitioners and the respondent respectively, have expressed satisfaction with the court’s fair and just resolution. The State’s representative, Mr. Manish Bansal, acknowledged the court’s decision, further solidifying the ruling’s standing.

The High Court’s decision is a testament to the judiciary’s role in not just adjudicating but also facilitating the resolution of disputes, underscoring the belief that the law ultimately serves to restore and maintain societal harmony.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

Bookmark Education Services Pvt. Ltd. and another VS State of U.T. Chandigarh and another       

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/PH-06-Nov-23-Bookmark_Education_Services_Pvt_vs_State_Of_Ut_Chandigarh_And_Anr.pdf"]

Latest Legal News