Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

High Court Rejects Bail Plea in POCSO Case Involving Teacher

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Bengaluru, 11th May 2023: In a significant development, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed a bail petition filed by C. Manjunath, an assistant teacher accused of sexually harassing minor girl students. The case (Criminal Petition No. 3560 of 2023) was registered under Sections 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

The petitioner had been working as an assistant teacher at a government primary school in Boragunte village, Tumkur district, Karnataka. It was alleged that he had been sexually harassing the minor girl students, aged between 8 to 11 years, studying in the same school. The incidents came to light when some villagers informed the Block Education Officer (BEO) about the accused's illegal activities.

Upon receiving the information, the BEO and Child Development Project Officer (CDPO) visited the school, accompanied by the accused. During the visit, several girl students alleged that the petitioner had inappropriately touched them, engaged in obscene conversations, and forced them to touch his private parts. Subsequently, a written complaint was filed with the Badavanahalli police station, leading to the registration of a case (Cr.No.36/2023) under the POCSO Act.

After the petitioner's arrest on 27th March 2023, he was produced before the First Track Special Court (FTSC-I), Tumkur, and has been in judicial custody since then. The bail application filed by the petitioner before the FTSC-I was rejected on 13th April 2023, prompting the filing of the present petition before the High Court.

During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel argued that their client was falsely implicated, citing a lack of previous complaints against him and alleging a conspiracy by the villagers due to a dispute over a petty shop in the school premises. However, the High Court Government Pleader (HCGP) opposed the bail application, emphasizing the heinous nature of the offenses and the threats issued by the petitioner to the victims and their parents/guardians.

Considering the gravity of the offenses and the potential harm caused to the victims and society, the court concurred with the decision of the FTSC-I and rejected the bail application. The court emphasized that the petitioner's actions not only violated the trust placed in teachers but also had far-reaching consequences for the victims' reputation and future.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the strict stance taken by the judiciary in cases involving the sexual harassment of minors and highlights the importance of safeguarding the rights and well-being of vulnerable children.

11th May 2023

C. Manjunath v. State of Karnataka & Thimmaraju

Latest Legal News