Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

High Court of Orissa Sets Aside Orders Granting Promotion During Pendency of Criminal Cases Against Government Servants

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Cutack, May 11, 2023: The High Court of Orissa delivered a significant judgment today in a batch of writ appeals, wherein it addressed the issue of granting promotions to government servants during the pendency of criminal cases against them. The order, numbered 11 and dated May 11, 2023, sets aside the orders of the learned Single Judge that directed the State of Odisha to grant promotions subject to the outcome of the criminal proceedings.

The court considered a common question that arose in all the appeals, namely, whether government servants could be granted ad hoc or regular promotions while criminal cases against them were still pending. It noted that the criminal cases were at various stages in the Court of the Special Judge (Vigilance) and that departmental proceedings were also pending in some cases.

The court observed that except in one appeal, the impugned orders were passed by the learned Single Judge on the first date of hearing without allowing the State of Odisha to file its reply. After hearing the arguments of the parties, the court examined various Office Memoranda (OMs) and Notifications issued by the Government of Odisha, which did not permit or envisage promotions during the pendency of criminal cases involving government servants.

Referring to legal precedents, including judgments of the Supreme Court, the court held that government servants do not have a right to be considered for promotion during the pendency of departmental or criminal proceedings. The plea for granting ad hoc promotions to the respondents was also rejected by the court, as it found no legal basis for such a request.

The court clarified that if a government servant is acquitted in the criminal proceedings and exonerated in the departmental proceedings, the notional benefits of the promotion due to the employee will be calculated, and the pension will be fixed accordingly. It further noted that the respondents could request the criminal courts to expedite the proceedings and bring the trials to an early conclusion.

Consequently, the court set aside the impugned orders of the learned Single Judge, as they directed the State of Odisha to grant promotions to the respondents subject to the outcome of the criminal cases. The writ appeals were allowed, and no costs were imposed.

This judgment has significant implications for the promotion policies concerning government servants facing criminal charges in the state of Odisha. The court's ruling clarifies the legal position that promotions cannot be granted during the pendency of criminal cases, emphasizing the importance of completing the criminal proceedings and departmental proceedings before considering promotions.

May 11, 2023:

State of Odisha and Another   vs Joseph Barik

Latest Legal News