Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

High Court of Manipur Sets Aside Detention Order Under NDPS Act -  “Unexplained Delay”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Manipur, comprising HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE M.V. MURALIDARAN and HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA, has set aside a detention order issued under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act NDPS , 1988. The judgment, dated 07.07.2023, came in response to Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 57 of 2023 filed by Mr. Aribam Sidik Ali, who had been detained under the Act.

The key highlight of the judgment was the Court’s finding of an “unexplained delay” on the part of the Central Government in disposing of Mr. Ali’s representation against the detention order. The Court observed that the State Government had followed the necessary procedures within the stipulated time, but it took an additional 12 days for the Central Government to consider the representation, and this delay remained unexplained.

The Court’s ruling, citing precedent cases, emphasized the significance of prompt action in handling representations related to detention orders. It was held that unexplained delays in such matters render the detention order invalid.

In its judgment, the High Court noted: “The Central Government could not explain the delay of 12 (twelve) days’ time taken while disposing of the representation even after receiving para-wise comment. On this ground alone, the detention order cannot be sustained.”

The detention order issued on 09.12.2022 and the subsequent confirmation order dated 07.02.2023 were declared null and void, leading to the immediate release of Mr. Aribam Sidik Ali from custody.

Date of Decision: 07.07.2023

Aribam Sidik Ali vs The Commissioner

Similar News