Granting Bail Does Not Shield Foreign Nationals from Executive Action on Visa Violations: Delhi High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Misused to Resolve Substantive Disputes or Replace Execution Mechanisms: P&H High Court Eviction Proceedings Must Follow Principles of Natural Justice: Telangana High Court Quashes Eviction Order under Senior Citizens Act Limitation Law | Sufficient Cause Cannot Be Liberally Interpreted If Negligence or Inaction Is Apparent: Gujarat High Court Mere Pendency of Lease Renewal Requests Does Not Constitute Bona Fide Dispute: Calcutta High Court Upholds Eviction Proceedings Under Public Premises Act CGST | Declaratory Nature of Safari Retreats Ruling Mandates Reassessment of Input Tax Credit Claims: Kerala High Court Changing Rules of the Game Mid-Way Violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution: Rajasthan High Court Disapproval of a Relationship Does Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide Without Direct Instigation or Mens Rea: Supreme Court Limitation Period Under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act Cannot Defeat Victim’s Right to Compensation: Gujarat High Court Maintenance To Wife Cannot Be a Precondition for Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 438 CrPC Court Cannot Rewrite Contract When Vendor Lacks Ownership of the Property: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance Royalty Can Be Levied on Minor Minerals Like Brick Earth, Irrespective of Land Ownership: Supreme Court Bail in Heinous Crimes Must Be Granted with Adequate Reasons and Judicial Scrutiny: Supreme Court Judicial Review in Disciplinary Cases Is Limited to Fairness, Not Reappreciation of Evidence: Supreme Court Prolonged Consensual Relationship Cannot Be Criminalized as Rape on False Promise of Marriage: Madras High Court No Interference in Judgments Without Perversity or Legal Error Under Section 100 CPC: Andhra Pradesh HC

High Court of Manipur Sets Aside Detention Order Under NDPS Act -  “Unexplained Delay”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Manipur, comprising HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE M.V. MURALIDARAN and HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA, has set aside a detention order issued under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act NDPS , 1988. The judgment, dated 07.07.2023, came in response to Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 57 of 2023 filed by Mr. Aribam Sidik Ali, who had been detained under the Act.

The key highlight of the judgment was the Court’s finding of an “unexplained delay” on the part of the Central Government in disposing of Mr. Ali’s representation against the detention order. The Court observed that the State Government had followed the necessary procedures within the stipulated time, but it took an additional 12 days for the Central Government to consider the representation, and this delay remained unexplained.

The Court’s ruling, citing precedent cases, emphasized the significance of prompt action in handling representations related to detention orders. It was held that unexplained delays in such matters render the detention order invalid.

In its judgment, the High Court noted: “The Central Government could not explain the delay of 12 (twelve) days’ time taken while disposing of the representation even after receiving para-wise comment. On this ground alone, the detention order cannot be sustained.”

The detention order issued on 09.12.2022 and the subsequent confirmation order dated 07.02.2023 were declared null and void, leading to the immediate release of Mr. Aribam Sidik Ali from custody.

Date of Decision: 07.07.2023

Aribam Sidik Ali vs The Commissioner

Similar News