Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

High Court of Delhi Modifies Disciplinary Punishment Based on "Honorable Acquittal" in Criminal Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered on July 24, 2023, the High Court of Delhi modified the disciplinary punishment imposed on police constables and head constables of the Delhi Police. The Court based its decision on the "honorable acquittal" of the accused in a criminal case, wherein the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt.

The case revolved around an incident in which an undertrial prisoner escaped from police custody during transit to a court hearing in 2007. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the police officers, resulting in the imposition of a punishment of forfeiture of ten years of approved service by the Disciplinary Authority.

Subsequently, the Appellate Authority reduced the punishment to five years of forfeiture on a permanent basis. The respondents then challenged this punishment in original applications (OAs) in 2010, but the Tribunal dismissed their OAs in 2011.

The turning point in the case came when the respondents were acquitted by the criminal court in 2012 due to the prosecution's failure to present sufficient evidence to prove the charges against them. Relying on the Supreme Court's definition of "honorable acquittal," the High Court recognized the respondents' acquittal as honorable, given the prosecution's inability to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Considering the passage of time since the initiation of the disciplinary proceedings and various rounds of litigation, the Court found that modifying the punishment to forfeiture of five years of approved service on a temporary basis was just and proportionate.

In its judgment, the High Court emphasized the significance of "honorable acquittal" and the authority of the Tribunal to modify punishments based on such acquittals. The Court held that the Tribunal's decision was in accordance with the principles of justice and fairness, making the modification of punishment justified.

High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order and vacated the interim order that had stayed the impugned order. The Court made no order regarding costs.

Date of Decision: July 24, 2023

GOVT OF NCT OF DLEHI & ORS vs NIHAL SINGH & ORS.

Latest Legal News