UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

High Court Grants Bail to Maninder Singh in Assault Case: Bail is the Rule, Jail an Exception

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, in a significant decision today, granted bail to Maninder Singh @ Beendhinda, the petitioner in the case numbered CRM-M-63559-2023. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari, presiding over the case, underscored the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence by stating, "Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception", drawing from the landmark judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "State of Rajasthan V. Balchand alias Baliay".

Maninder Singh had sought regular bail in an FIR registered under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 307, 323, 324, 506, 148, and 149, at the P.S. City Barnala, District Barnala. The allegations involved Singh and other co-accused in an assault incident.

Justice Tiwari, in his ruling, highlighted the importance of personal liberty and the presumption of innocence as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Reflecting on the legal principles governing bail, the court cited "Nikesh Tarachand Shah V. Union of India", (2018) 11 SCC 1, to emphasize the judicial discretion in bail matters.

Singh, who has already faced incarceration for 10 months and 3 days, was granted bail considering the nature of the allegations against him and the fact that other co-accused, accused of inflicting more serious injuries, had been granted bail in related cases.

The court's decision to grant bail was also influenced by the need to strike a balance between the individual’s right to liberty and the societal interest, as noted in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra.

However, Justice Tiwari cautioned that if Singh is found indulging in similar offences in the future, the State has the liberty to apply for the cancellation of the bail granted. This ruling, while specific to this case, sets a precedent in the application of bail laws, highlighting the judiciary's commitment to upholding individual rights while ensuring societal safety.

Date of Decision: January 08, 2024

MANINDER SINGH @ BEENDHINDA  VS STATE OF PUNJAB

 

Latest Legal News