Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

High Court Grants Bail to Maninder Singh in Assault Case: Bail is the Rule, Jail an Exception

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, in a significant decision today, granted bail to Maninder Singh @ Beendhinda, the petitioner in the case numbered CRM-M-63559-2023. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari, presiding over the case, underscored the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence by stating, "Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception", drawing from the landmark judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "State of Rajasthan V. Balchand alias Baliay".

Maninder Singh had sought regular bail in an FIR registered under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 307, 323, 324, 506, 148, and 149, at the P.S. City Barnala, District Barnala. The allegations involved Singh and other co-accused in an assault incident.

Justice Tiwari, in his ruling, highlighted the importance of personal liberty and the presumption of innocence as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Reflecting on the legal principles governing bail, the court cited "Nikesh Tarachand Shah V. Union of India", (2018) 11 SCC 1, to emphasize the judicial discretion in bail matters.

Singh, who has already faced incarceration for 10 months and 3 days, was granted bail considering the nature of the allegations against him and the fact that other co-accused, accused of inflicting more serious injuries, had been granted bail in related cases.

The court's decision to grant bail was also influenced by the need to strike a balance between the individual’s right to liberty and the societal interest, as noted in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra.

However, Justice Tiwari cautioned that if Singh is found indulging in similar offences in the future, the State has the liberty to apply for the cancellation of the bail granted. This ruling, while specific to this case, sets a precedent in the application of bail laws, highlighting the judiciary's commitment to upholding individual rights while ensuring societal safety.

Date of Decision: January 08, 2024

MANINDER SINGH @ BEENDHINDA  VS STATE OF PUNJAB

 

Latest Legal News