Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

High Court Grants Bail to Maninder Singh in Assault Case: Bail is the Rule, Jail an Exception

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, in a significant decision today, granted bail to Maninder Singh @ Beendhinda, the petitioner in the case numbered CRM-M-63559-2023. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari, presiding over the case, underscored the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence by stating, "Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception", drawing from the landmark judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "State of Rajasthan V. Balchand alias Baliay".

Maninder Singh had sought regular bail in an FIR registered under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 307, 323, 324, 506, 148, and 149, at the P.S. City Barnala, District Barnala. The allegations involved Singh and other co-accused in an assault incident.

Justice Tiwari, in his ruling, highlighted the importance of personal liberty and the presumption of innocence as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Reflecting on the legal principles governing bail, the court cited "Nikesh Tarachand Shah V. Union of India", (2018) 11 SCC 1, to emphasize the judicial discretion in bail matters.

Singh, who has already faced incarceration for 10 months and 3 days, was granted bail considering the nature of the allegations against him and the fact that other co-accused, accused of inflicting more serious injuries, had been granted bail in related cases.

The court's decision to grant bail was also influenced by the need to strike a balance between the individual’s right to liberty and the societal interest, as noted in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra.

However, Justice Tiwari cautioned that if Singh is found indulging in similar offences in the future, the State has the liberty to apply for the cancellation of the bail granted. This ruling, while specific to this case, sets a precedent in the application of bail laws, highlighting the judiciary's commitment to upholding individual rights while ensuring societal safety.

Date of Decision: January 08, 2024

MANINDER SINGH @ BEENDHINDA  VS STATE OF PUNJAB

 

Latest Legal News